Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Vertical inheritance and unique differential phenotypes of reciprocal recombinant chromosome 18 within a multi-generation family

Abstract

Carriers of balanced pericentric inversions are at risk for producing unbalanced gametes because of meiotic recombination resulting in de novo deletion and duplication of distal chromosome ends. Recombinant chromosomes generally lead to significant imbalances resulting in anomalous clinical phenotypes in offspring, hence they are typically not inherited. Therefore, the vertical transmission of recombinant chromosomes is a clinically rare event. Using genomic microarray and karyotyping, we describe inheritance of recombinant chromosomes in a three-generation family with the grandmother carrying a mosaic pericentric inversion of chromosome 18. Three children inherited the balanced inversion and one child with a mild phenotype inherited a de novo recombinant chromosome 18. In the third generation, a newborn with a variant of holoprosencephaly inherited an unmodified recombinant chromosome from her mother. Despite having the same karyotype predicting loss of the TGIF1 gene from the 18p terminus, the mother exhibits a relatively unaffected phenotype. The cousin of the child with holoprosencephaly carries the reciprocal recombinant chromosome 18 with a much milder phenotype. We verified the cytogenetic mechanism and corresponding clinical phenotypes in affected individuals and illustrated possible recombinant chromosome consequences of the inversion of chromosome 18 in this three-generation family.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Pedigree and karyotype/microarray results.
Fig. 2: Microarray depiction of the pair of reciprocal recombinant chromosome 18 in the family and TGIF1 deletion topology.
Fig. 3: Vertical inheritance of the recombinant chromosome 18 and relevant genetic mechanisms.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The study presented here does not involve sharable genomic data contents or public resources.

References

  1. Balasundaram P, Avulakunta ID. Edwards syndrome. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2024.

  2. Budisteanu M, Arghir A, Chirieac SM, Tutulan-Cunita A, Lungeanu A. 18q deletion syndrome - a case report. Maedica. 2010;5:135–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vermeulen SJ, Speleman F, Vanransbeeck L, Verspeet J, Menten B, Verschraegen-Spae MR, et al. Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 18: behavioral abnormalities in patients heterozygous for either the dup(18p)/del(18q) or dup(18q)/del(18p) recombinant chromosome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:52–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020;22:245–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wotton D, Taniguchi K. Functions of TGIF homeodomain proteins and their roles in normal brain development and holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:128–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cody JD, Heard P, Rupert D, Hasi-Zogaj M, Hill A, Sebold C, et al. Chromosome 18 gene dosage map 2.0. Hum Genet. 2018;137:961–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang L, Dong B, Xie Y, Kang H, Wu Y. The molecular mechanisms of recombinant chromosome 18 with parental pericentric inversions and a review of the literature. J Hum Genet. 2023;68:625–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prontera P, Buldrini B, Aiello V, Rogaia D, Mencarelli A, Gruppioni R, et al. Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 18: intrafamilial variability of the recombinant dup(18q). Genet Couns. 2010;21:91–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo HF, Hong M, Krauss RS. Concepts in multifactorial etiology of developmental disorders: gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in holoprosencephaly. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:795194.

  10. Odent S, Le Marec B, Munnich A, Le Merrer M, Bonaiti-Pellie C. Segregation analysis in nonsyndromic holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet. 1998;77:139–43.

  11. Mercier S, Dubourg C, Garcelon N, Campillo-Gimenez B, Gicquel I, Belleguic M, et al. New findings for phenotype-genotype correlations in a large European series of holoprosencephaly cases. J Med Genet. 2011;48:752–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenfeld JA, Ballif BC, Martin DM, Aylsworth AS, Bejjani BA, Torchia BS, et al. Clinical characterization of individuals with deletions of genes in holoprosencephaly pathways by aCGH refines the phenotypic spectrum of HPE. Hum Genet. 2010;127:421–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceccarini C, Sinibaldi L, Bernardini L, De Simone R, Mingarelli R, Novelli A, et al. Duplication 18q21.31-q22.2. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143:343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasi-Zogaj M, Sebold C, Heard P, Carter E, Soileau B, Hill A, et al. A review of 18p deletions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015;169:251–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henson KE, Hines KA, Weaver DD, Torres WM, Verbrugge J, Stone K, et al. Duplication of 18q21.32-q22.3 identified in a stillborn and two relatives with minimal dysmorphic features. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:1788–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poterico JA, Vasquez F, Chavez-Pastor M, Trubnykova M, Chavesta F, Chirinos J, et al. A Peruvian child with 18p-/18q+ syndrome and persistent microscopic hematuria. J Pediatr Genet. 2017;6:258–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Quiroga R, Monfort S, Oltra S, Ferrer-Bolufer I, Rosello M, Mayo S, et al. Partial duplication of 18q including a distal critical region for Edwards Syndrome in a patient with normal phenotype and oligoasthenospermia: case report. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;133:78–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han M, Wei L, Liu F, Gao X. Familial microdeletion 18p11.32 to 18p11.31 in a Chinese family with normal phenotype. Mol Cytogenet. 2022;15:12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cody JD, Heard PL, Crandall AC, Carter EM, Li J, Hardies LJ, et al. Narrowing critical regions and determining penetrance for selected 18q- phenotypes. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:1421–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Versacci P, Digilio MC, Sauer U, Dallapiccola B, Marino B. Absent pulmonary valve with intact ventricular septum and patent ductus arteriosus: a specific cardiac phenotype associated with deletion 18q syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;138A:185–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson MG, Towner JW, Forsman I, Siris E. Syndromes associated with deletion of the long arm of chromosome 18[del(18q)]. Am J Med Genet. 1979;3:155–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our patients’ family for their willingness to share their stories, in hopes of helping families with rare cytogenetic disorders and their providers.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1TR004409. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TW drafted the manuscript. TW, GA and DV conceptualized and designed the study. TW, BO, DIQ, ANL, EFA and BH analyzed and interpreted the data. GA, TW, DV, and JP collected samples and provided genetic counseling. GA, BO, and DV recruited patients and provided clinical care. DV obtained funding for the studies and oversaw the clinical work. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ting Wen or David Viskochil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Ethics Committee of Intermountain Healthcare for studies involving humans. Ethical review and approval were not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient/parent/guardian/ relative of the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, T., Akay, G., Palumbos, J. et al. Vertical inheritance and unique differential phenotypes of reciprocal recombinant chromosome 18 within a multi-generation family. Eur J Hum Genet 34, 128–133 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01878-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01878-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links