Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Summary Review
  • Published:

Is the response rate of oral appliance therapy for subjects with and without position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea different?

A Correction to this article was published on 16 December 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the effect of oral appliance (OA) treatment on non-position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (non-POSA) and position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA).

MethodsThe investigational sample was 205 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline and they were classified as non-POSA and POSA. Polygraphic registration was employed to compare the proportion of treatment responders between non-POSA and POSA groups at eight-week and one-year follow-ups. The treatment responder was defined as apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) <10 and/or ≥50% reduction in AHI.

ResultsAt the eight-week follow-up, the proportions of responders were 56% and 69% for the non-POSA and POSA groups (not significant), respectively. The responder proportions were increased to 68% and 77% for the two groups, respectively, at the one-year follow-up (not significant between the two groups). At the two follow-ups, there was no significant difference in absolute change in overall AHI between the two groups. However, the decrease in supine AHI was significantly greater in the POSA group, while the decrease in non-supine AHI was significantly greater in the non-POSA group.

ConclusionsThe response rate for OA treatment did not differ between POSA and non-POSA groups. However, greater decreases in supine AHI and non-supine AHI were found among POSA and non-POSA patients, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Zhu Y, Long H, Jian F et al. The effectiveness of oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 1394-1402.

  2. Okuno K, Furuhashi A, Nakamura S et al. The success rate of oral appliances based on multiple criteria according to obstructive sleep apnoea severity, BMI and age: A large multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil 2020; 47: 1178-1183.

  3. Xia F, Sawan M. Clinical and Research Solutions to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21: 1784.

  4. Chung J W, Enciso R, Levendowski D J, Morgan T D, Westbrook P R, Clark G T. Treatment outcomes of mandibular advancement devices in positional and nonpositional OSA patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 724-731.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, L., Long, H. Is the response rate of oral appliance therapy for subjects with and without position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea different?. Evid Based Dent 23, 124–125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0810-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0810-5

Search

Quick links