Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of oral appliance (OA) treatment on non-position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (non-POSA) and position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA).
MethodsThe investigational sample was 205 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline and they were classified as non-POSA and POSA. Polygraphic registration was employed to compare the proportion of treatment responders between non-POSA and POSA groups at eight-week and one-year follow-ups. The treatment responder was defined as apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) <10 and/or ≥50% reduction in AHI.
ResultsAt the eight-week follow-up, the proportions of responders were 56% and 69% for the non-POSA and POSA groups (not significant), respectively. The responder proportions were increased to 68% and 77% for the two groups, respectively, at the one-year follow-up (not significant between the two groups). At the two follow-ups, there was no significant difference in absolute change in overall AHI between the two groups. However, the decrease in supine AHI was significantly greater in the POSA group, while the decrease in non-supine AHI was significantly greater in the non-POSA group.
ConclusionsThe response rate for OA treatment did not differ between POSA and non-POSA groups. However, greater decreases in supine AHI and non-supine AHI were found among POSA and non-POSA patients, respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
16 December 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0828-8
References
Zhu Y, Long H, Jian F et al. The effectiveness of oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 1394-1402.
Okuno K, Furuhashi A, Nakamura S et al. The success rate of oral appliances based on multiple criteria according to obstructive sleep apnoea severity, BMI and age: A large multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil 2020; 47: 1178-1183.
Xia F, Sawan M. Clinical and Research Solutions to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21: 1784.
Chung J W, Enciso R, Levendowski D J, Morgan T D, Westbrook P R, Clark G T. Treatment outcomes of mandibular advancement devices in positional and nonpositional OSA patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 724-731.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pu, L., Long, H. Is the response rate of oral appliance therapy for subjects with and without position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea different?. Evid Based Dent 23, 124–125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0810-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0810-5


