Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the use of the Penicillin Allergy Reassessment for Treatment Improvement (PARTI) tool in supporting appropriate penicillin allergy labelling in dental practices.
Design
Parallel mixed methods study.
Methods
Focus groups of patients with documented penicillin allergies and healthcare worker targeted questionnaires were used in gathering feedback on the PARTI tool’s design and functionality. Transcriptions of the focus group discussions and free text answers from the questionnaires were coded for analysis using a modified grounded theory approach.
Results
A total of 15 patients engaged in the focus groups and 50 healthcare workers responded to the questionnaire. Mean age of the patients was 52 years and 53.3% were female. Most patients (73.3%) had visited a dentist in the preceding year and 86.6% were asked about drug allergies. Healthcare worker respondents included 30% pharmacists and dentists, dental hygienists, and dental assistants (28%). Feedback from patients and healthcare workers on the PARTI tool was constructive and suggestions were made for improvement. Many healthcare workers (68%) highlighted the importance of the section on penicillin allergy testing in the PARTI tool. Feedback from the participants was incorporated into the final PARTI tool.
Conclusions
Feedback from patients and healthcare workers was used to finalise a tool for dental practices to enhance dentist-patient communications regarding penicillin allergy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
National Penicillin Allergy Day. Available at https://nationalpenicillinallergyday.com (accessed December 2024).
Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Millions mistakenly think they are allergic to penicillin. 2023. Available at https://www.rpharms.com/about-us/news/details/millions-mistakenly-think-they-are-allergic-to-penicillin- (accessed December 2024).
Specialist Services Committee. Penicillin de-labelling project improves accuracy of antibiotic allergy diagnoses. 2024. Available at https://sscbc.ca/news/2024/05/02/penicillin-de-labelling-project-improves-accuracy-antibiotic-allergy-diagnoses (accessed December 2024).
World Health Organization. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions: a practical guide. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2021.
Powell N, Stephens J, Kohl D, Owens R, Ahmed S, Musicha C, et al. The effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and delabeling of adult and pediatric patients by nonallergy specialists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;129:152–61.
Kunz Coyne AJ, Holger D, Kennedy E, Connell M, Binienda J, Giuliano C, et al. Penicillin allergy reassessment for treatment improvement: A dental office tool to support appropriate penicillin allergy labeling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2024;155:379–89.
O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:92–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests. CAY serves as an Editorial Board Member on Evidence-Based Dentistry.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeung, C.A. How can we remove erroneous penicillin allergy labels?. Evid Based Dent 26, 50–51 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01100-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01100-9
This article is cited by
-
EBD spotlight: Removing erroneous penicillin allergy labels
BDJ Team (2025)