Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Prosthodontics

Do patient and surgical factors predict postoperative discomfort in implant dentistry?

Abstract

Data sources

The study utilized records from the Department of Oral Implantology at Wuhan University (May 2020 to April 2021). A total of 366 participants with missing teeth requiring implant-supported rehabilitation were included. Records detailed patient demographics, clinical procedures, and postoperative experiences. Data were collected through telephonic follow-ups and questionnaires assessing pain, anxiety, discomfort, and adverse events.

Study selection

Participants were selected based on the need for dental implant placement and/or bone augmentation. Inclusion criteria included being over 18 years old, possessing basic communication skills, and providing consent. Patients with systemic diseases, acute oral infections, or contraindications to implant therapy were excluded. Secondary-stage surgeries and sites with prior augmentation or implant failure were also excluded.

Data extraction and synthesis

Variables such as age, gender, alcohol consumption, smoking status, periodontal status, surgical procedures, and postoperative complications were collected. Perception of pain, anxiety, and discomfort was measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Logistic regression identified predictors of discomfort severity and duration.

Results

Most participants reported mild or no pain (78.7%) and anxiety (89.7%) during surgery. Discomfort decreased significantly over time, with 57.7% reporting discomfort on day 1, 36.1% on day 3, and 0% by day 14.

Conclusion

Alcohol consumption, pain perception during surgery, age, and bone augmentation procedures were key predictors of discomfort. Tailored care is recommended to enhance outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Wu X, Ye M, Sun J, Yan Q, Shi B, Xia H. Patient-reported outcome measures following surgeries in implant dentistry and associated factors: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e059730. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059730

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mukawa K, Higuchi D, Furuyama C, Baba K. Predicting patient-reported outcomes of dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33:863–70. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:467–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao J, Tang H, Gao XL, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Patients’ expectations to dental implant: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:153 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0153-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu B, Anderson DB, Park ES, Chen L, Lee JH. The influence of smoking and alcohol on bone healing: Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-pathological fractures. eClinicalMedicine. 2021;42:101179 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:569–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza EdosS. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:377–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlson NE, Roach RB Jr. Platelet-rich plasma: clinical applications in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:1383–6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Windisch P, Iorio-Siciliano V, Palkovics D, Ramaglia L, Blasi A, Sculean A. The role of surgical flap design (minimally invasive flap vs. extended flap with papilla preservation) on the healing of intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix derivative: a 12-month two-center randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:1811–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin C-S, Wu S-Y, Yi C-A. Association between anxiety and pain in dental treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;96:153–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516678168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lebares CC, Guvva EV, Olaru M, Sugrue LP, Staffaroni AM, Delucchi KL, et al. Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive training in surgery: additional analysis of the mindful surgeon pilot randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e194108 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Alzahrani AAH, Gibson BJ. Scoping review of the role of shared decision-making in dental implant consultations. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018;3:130–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084418761340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00571.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Asiri A, Nazir MA, Alsharief M, Shahin S, Al-Ansari A, Al-Khalifa KS. Effect of psychological distress on oral health: A cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:1508. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-01508-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Selva Arockiam.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arockiam, A.S., Chandrashekaraiah, P., Shivananjan, R. et al. Do patient and surgical factors predict postoperative discomfort in implant dentistry?. Evid Based Dent 26, 23–25 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01122-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01122-x

Search

Quick links