Abstract
Purpose
To compare the long-term decentration and tilt in two multifocal intraocular lenses (MfIOLs) with an OPD-Scan III aberrometer.
Methods
Eighty cataract patients who underwent uneventful MfIOL implantation (42 with AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® SN6AD1 and 38 with AMO Tecnis® ZMB00) were enrolled. At 1 year after surgery, a postoperative visual acuity evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, distance-corrected near visual acuity, and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity. OPD-Scan III aberrometer was used to collect the decentration, tilt, and high-order aberration (HOA) data. Significance was tested with Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney U test, paired t test, and χ2 test
Results
The average intraocular tilt was lower in the SN6AD1 group than in the ZMB00 group, whereas the average decentration of the two groups did not differ significantly. The mean total ocular HOAs, ocular trefoil, total internal HOAs, and spherical aberrations were significantly lower in the SN6AD1 group than in the ZMB00 group. In both the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, the intraocular tilt was directly proportional to the total ocular HOAs, coma, and spherical aberration. However, there was no significant correlation between decentration and any type of HOA in SN6AD1 group, whereas decentration correlated positively with total ocular HOAs, coma, and spherical aberration in ZMB00 group.
Conclusion
Both MfIOLs significantly improve the visual acuity of the patients. However, tilt was lower in the SN6AD1 group than in the ZMB00 group 1 year after surgery, which provide fewer HOAs and better visual quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Hayashi K, Ogawa S, Manabe S, Hirata A. Visual outcomes in eyes with a distance-dominant diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with low near addition power. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:1466–70.
Lubinski W, Gronkowska-Serafin J, Podboraczynska-Jodko K. Clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lens. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:1220–6.
Pedrotti E, Mastropasqua R, Passilongo M, Parisi G, Marchesoni I, Marchini G. Comparison of two multifocal intraocular lens designs that differ only in near add. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:754–60.
Chaves MA, Hida WT, Tzeliks PF, Gonçalves MR, Nogueira Fde B, Nakano CT, et al. Comparative study on optical performance and visual outcomes between two diffractive multifocal lenses: AMO Tecnis (R) ZMB00 and AcrySof (R) IQ ReSTOR (R) Multifocal IOL SN6AD1. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016;79:171–6.
Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, Bono V, Mencucci R, Cillino S. Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:34–44.
Guyton DL, Uozato H, Wisnicki HJ. Rapid determination of intraocular lens tilt and decentration through the undilated pupil. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:1259–64.
Rosales P, De Castro A, Jimenez-Alfaro I, Marcos S. Intraocular lens alignment from purkinje and Scheimpflug imaging. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93:400–8.
Jafarzadehpur E, Hashemi H, Abdolahinia T, Yekta AA, Khabazkhoob M. Comparison of ocular aberrations in two hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41:287–90.
McGinnigle S, Naroo SA, Eperjesi F. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97:160–3.
Maurino V, Allan BD, Rubin GS, Bunce C, Xing W, Findl O. Quality of vision after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a randomized trial--AT LISA 809M versus AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:700–10.
Schmickler S, Bautista CP, Goes F, Shah S, Wolffsohn JS. Clinical evaluation of a multifocal aspheric diffractive intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:1560–4.
de Vries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:268–78.
de Vries NE, Webers CA, Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nuijts RM. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1316–22.
Montes-Mico R, Lopez-Gil N, Perez-Vives C, Bonaque S, Ferrer-Blasco T. In vitro optical performance of nonrotational symmetric and refractive-diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses: impact of tilt and decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1657–63.
Choi SK, Kim JH, Lee D, Park SH, Maeda N, Ma KJ. IOL tilt and decentration. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1862. 1862.e1861–1864
Kranitz K, Mihaltz K, Sandor GL, Takacs A, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ. Intraocular lens tilt and decentration measured by Scheimpflug camera following manual or femtosecond laser-created continuous circular capsulotomy. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:259–63.
Wang X, Dong J, Wang X, Wu Q. IOL tilt and decentration estimation from 3 dimensional reconstruction of OCT image. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59109.
Zhao YE, Gong XH, Zhu XN, Li HM, Tu MJ, Coursey TG, et al. Long-term outcomes of ciliary sulcus versus capsular bag fixation of intraocular lenses in children: an ultrasound biomicroscopy study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172979.
Baumeister M, Neidhardt B, Strobel J, Kohnen T. Tilt and decentration of three-piece foldable high-refractive silicone and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with 6-mm optics in an intra-individual comparison. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:1051–8.
de CA, Rosales P, Marcos S. Tilt and decentration of intraocular lenses in vivo from Purkinje and Scheimpflug imaging. Validation study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:418–29.
Jung CK, Chung SK, Baek NH. Decentration and tilt: silicone multifocal versus acrylic soft intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:582–5.
Oshika T, Sugita G, Miyata K, Tokunaga T, Samejima T, Okamoto C, et al. Influence of tilt and decentration of scleral-sutured intraocular lens on ocular higher-order wavefront aberration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:185–8.
Taketani F, Matuura T, Yukawa E, Hara Y. Influence of intraocular lens tilt and decentration on wavefront aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2158–62.
Taketani F, Yukawa E, Yoshii T, Sugie Y, Hara Y. Influence of intraocular lens optical design on high-order aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:969–72.
Soda M, Yaguchi S. Effect of decentration on the optical performance in multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227:197–204.
Eppig T, Scholz K, Loffler A, Messner A, Langenbucher A. Effect of decentration and tilt on the image quality of aspheric intraocular lens designs in a model eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1091–1100.
Alio JL, Peña-García P, Pachkoria K, Alio JL 2nd, El Aswad A. Intraocular optical quality of phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of angle-supported, iris-fixated, and posterior chamber lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:789–99.
Yang HC, Chung SK, Baek NH. Decentration, tilt, and near vision of the array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:586–9.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81470613, 81100653, 81670835, and 81270989), Shanghai High Myopia Study Group, International Science and Technology Cooperation Foundation of Shanghai (grant no. 14430721100), Shanghai Talent Development Fund (grant no. 201604), Shanghai Youth Doctor Support Program (grant no. 2014118), Outstanding Youth Medical Talents Program of Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission, and scientific research program of Shanghai municipal health and Family Planning Commission (20174Y0186).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, W., Qiu, X., Zhang, S. et al. Comparison of long-term decentration and tilt in two types of multifocal intraocular lenses with OPD-Scan III aberrometer. Eye 32, 1237–1243 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0068-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0068-5
This article is cited by
-
Effect of crystalline lens decentration and tilt on visual performance in eyes implanted with bifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lenses
BMC Ophthalmology (2025)
-
Lens tilt and decentration in a Chinese population with age-related cataracts and their influencing factors
BMC Ophthalmology (2025)
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Ophthalmology (2024)
-
Effects of lighting conditions and accommodation on the three-dimensional position of Visian implantable collamer lens
Eye and Vision (2022)
-
Effects of tilt and decentration of Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) on visual quality: an observational study
BMC Ophthalmology (2022)
