Abstract
Objectives
To compare diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading and management plan between virtual review using widefield Clarus imaging and macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) versus slit lamp clinical examination and macular OCT.
Method
New referrals over 3 months from the National Diabetic Eye Screening programme (DESP) were screened. Patients who had both Clarus widefield imaging and macular OCT were included. All patients underwent slit lamp examination in clinic. Data obtained from electronic patient records included referral reason, DR grading and management plan. Two graders retrospectively reviewed imaging and formulated a management plan blinded to results from patients’ clinic visit. Results from virtual examination were compared with those from slit lamp examination.
Results
One-hundred and two eyes of 51 patients were assessed. 11 fundus photos from 7 patients and 15 fundus photos from 10 patients were deemed inadequate by grader G1 and G2, respectively. Eighteen (35%) patients and 11 (22%) patients from virtual assessment by G1 and G2, respectively were found to need a face a face appointment to aid diagnosis. Compared to slit lamp examination, 15% and 7.5% of patients from G1 and G2’s virtual assessment respectively had different proposed management plan. Agreement of DR grading between both virtual graders and slit lamp examination was fair (Kappa’s coefficient = 0.56). One case of slit lamp noted retinal neovascularization, which was graded as background retinopathy by DESP was also graded as such on virtual assessment.
Conclusion
Widefield Clarus and OCT imaging allowed two-thirds of DESP referrals to be safely managed virtually.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Scanlon PH. The English National Screening Programme for diabetic retinopathy 2003–2016. Acta Diabetol. 2017;54:515–25.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.
rcophth-The-Way-Forward-AMD-Summary-300117-1.pdf [Internet]. https://rcophth.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/RCOphth-The-Way-Forward-AMD-Summary-300117-1.pdf.
Kern C, Kortuem K, Hamilton R, Fasolo S, Cai Y, Balaskas K. et al. Clinical outcomes of a hospital-based teleophthalmology service: what happens to patients in a virtual clinic? Ophthalmol Retina. 2019;3:422–8.
Kortuem K, Fasler K, Charnley A, Khambati H, Fasolo S, Katz M, et al. Implementation of medical retina virtual clinics in a tertiary eye care referral centre. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:1391–5.
Lee JX, Manjunath V, Talks SJ. Expanding the role of medical retina virtual clinics using multimodal ultra-widefield and optical coherence tomography imaging. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2337–45.
Hinkle JW, Flynn HW, Banta JT, Vanner EA. Patients presenting emergently with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: follow-up and factors associated with compliance. Retin Philos. 2020;40:928–35.
Ashraf M, Shokrollahi S, Salongcay RP, Aiello LP, Silva PS. Diabetic retinopathy and ultrawide field imaging. Semin Ophthalmol. 2020;35:56–65.
Aiello LP, Odia I, Glassman AR, Melia M, Jampol LM, Bressler NM, et al. Comparison of early treatment diabetic retinopathy study standard 7-field imaging with ultrawide-field imaging for determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019;137:65–73.
Purbrick RMJ, Izadi S, Gupta A, Chong NV. Comparison of Optomap ultrawide-field imaging versus slit-lamp biomicroscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy in a real-life clinic. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1413–7.
Manjunath V, Papastavrou V, Steel DHW, Menon G, Taylor R, Peto T, et al. Wide-field imaging and OCT vs clinical evaluation of patients referred from diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye 2015;29:416–23.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.
Hirano T, Imai A, Kasamatsu H, Kakihara S, Toriyama Y, Murata T. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and OptosTM systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:332.
Funding
Mr Rajendram has received speaker fees from Zeiss.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lim, W.S., Grimaldi, G., Nicholson, L. et al. Widefield imaging with Clarus fundus camera vs slit lamp fundus examination in assessing patients referred from the National Health Service diabetic retinopathy screening programme. Eye 35, 299–306 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01218-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01218-x
This article is cited by
-
Wide-field imaging with smartphone based fundus camera: grading of severity of diabetic retinopathy and locating peripheral lesions in diabetic retinopathy
Eye (2024)
-
Fotobasierte Untersuchung auf diabetische Augenveränderungen in einer deutschen Augenarztpraxis ohne direkten Arzt-Patienten-Kontakt
Die Ophthalmologie (2023)
-
Ultra-wide-field fundus photography compared to ophthalmoscopy in diagnosing and classifying major retinal diseases
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Outcomes following implementation of a high-volume medical retina virtual clinic utilising a diagnostic hub during COVID-19
Eye (2022)
