Table 1 Treatment outcomes in PCV treatment trials. Adapted from previous work [98].

From: Evolving treatment paradigms for PCV

Study

Follow-up (months)

Treatment

Patients in trial arm (n)

Number of injections

Number of PDTs

Polyp regression rate, %

Baseline visual acuity (ETDRS letters)

Mean vision change (ETDRS letters)

EVEREST (2012) [17]

6

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W → PRN

21

5.2

1.9 (sham)

28.6

49.0

9.2

  

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W + PDT → PRN

19

3.9

1.7

77.8

57.2

10.9

EVEREST II (2017) [99]

12

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W → PRN

168

7.3

2.3 (sham)

34.7

61.1

5.1

  

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W + PDT → PRN

154

5.2

1.5

69.3

61.2

8.3

EVEREST II (2020) [20]

24

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W → PRN

168

12.0

26.7

61.1

5.5

  

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W + PDT → PRN

154

6.0

2.0

56.6

61.2

9.6

LAPTOP (2013) [18]

12

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W → PRN

47

5.8

Not reported

88.0

4.0

  

Initial PDT → PRN

46

5.2

1.5

Not reported

84.0

−2.0

FUJISAN (2015) [38]

12

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W + PDT → PRN

37

4.5

1.1

62.1

54.3

8.1

  

Ranibizumab ×3 Q4W → PRN + deferred PDT

35

6.8

1.4

54.8

54.9

8.8

PLANET (2018) [21]

12

Aflibercept ×3 Q4W → Q8W

145

8.1

0.2 (sham)

38.9

57.7

10.7

  

Aflibercept ×3 Q4W → Q8W + rescue PDT

154

8.0

0.2

44.8

59.0

10.8

PLANET (2019) [22]

22

Aflibercept ×3 Q4W → Q8W

137

12.7

0.3 (sham)

82.1

57.7

10.7

  

Aflibercept ×3 Q4W → Q8W + rescue PDT

147

12.6

0.3

85.6

59.0

9.1