Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the causal relationship between depression, anxiety, and myopia.
Methods
The multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) design using summary statistics from independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) was employed. The anxiety and depression, were used as exposures, and myopia was used as the outcome. Genetic variants associated with depression were derived using GWAS summary statistics from the FinnGen consortium database. Genetic variants associated with anxiety were derived from the Psychiatric Genomics consortium. The inverse-variance-weighted method was the main applied analytic tool and was complemented with comprehensive sensitivity analyses.
Results
A total of 21, 10 SNPs were selected as instrumental variables for depression and anxiety, respectively. Based on the IVW analysis, both depression (OR = 1.010, 95% CI = 1.002–1.018, P = 0.016) and anxiety (OR = 1.083, 95%CI = 1.022–1.149, P = 0.008) increased the risk of myopia. After adjusting in the multivariable MR, the IVW and Egger methods indicated that depression (OR = 1.004, 95%CI = 1.000–1.008, P = 0.030) or anxiety (OR = 1.004, 95%CI = 1.001–1.008, P = 0.026) was still associated with elevated risks of myopia.
Conclusions
The current study identified a causal relationship between anxiety, depression, and an increased risk of myopia. These observations suggest that when developing strategies to control myopia, it is also important to focus on the mental health of children. Further detailed research is needed to fully understand this issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 18 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $14.39 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analysed during the current study are available in the FinnGen consortium (https://r10.finngen.fi/), Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26754954/), and MRC IEU OpenGWAS (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ukb-b-6353/).
References
Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015;519:276–8.
Sankaridurg P, Tahhan N, Kandel H, Naduvilath T, Zou H, Frick KD, et al. IMI Impact of Myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62:2.
Jonas JB, Jonas RA, Bikbov MM, Wang YX, Panda-Jonas S. Myopia: Histology, clinical features, and potential implications for the etiology of axial elongation. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 2023;96:101156.
Ha A, Kim SJ, Shim SR, Kim YK, Jung JH. Efficacy and safety of 8 Atropine concentrations for myopia control in children: a network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2022;129:322–33.
Lawrenson JG, Shah R, Huntjens B, Downie LE, Virgili G, Dhakal R, et al. Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2023 Feb 16 [cited 2023 Oct 27];2023. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD014758.pub2
Morgan IG, Wu PC, Ostrin LA, Tideman JWL, Yam JC, Lan W, et al. IMI risk factors for myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62:3.
Troilo D, Smith EL III, Nickla DL, Ashby R, Tkatchenko AV, Ostrin LA, et al. IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:M31–88.
Ostrin LA, Harb E, Nickla DL, Read SA, Alonso-Caneiro D, Schroedl F, et al. IMI—The dynamic choroid: new insights, challenges, and potential significance for human myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64:4.
Mountjoy E, Davies NM, Plotnikov D, Smith GD, Rodriguez S, Williams CE, et al. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation. BMJ. 2018;361:k2022.
Wei CC, Kung YJ, Chen CS, Chang CY, Lin CJ, Tien PT, et al. Allergic conjunctivitis-induced retinal inflammation promotes myopia progression. eBioMedicine. 2018;28:274–86.
Li FF, Zhu MC, Shao YL, Lu F, Yi QY, Huang XF. Causal relationships between glycemic traits and myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64:7.
Dong XX, Xie JY, Li DL, Dong Y, Zhang XF, Lanca C, et al. Association of sleep traits with myopia in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study. Prevent Med. 2024;180:107893.
Li Q, Yang J, He Y, Wang T, Zhong L, Zhu Z, et al. Investigation of the psychological health of first-year high school students with myopia in Guangzhou. Brain Behav. 2020;10:e01594.
Zhang H, Gao H, Zhu Y, Zhu Y, Dang W, Wei R, et al. Relationship between myopia and other risk factors with anxiety and depression among chinese university freshmen during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health. 2021;9:774237 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.774237/full Dec 1 [cited 2024 May 14].
Sagar R, Dandona R, Gururaj G, Dhaliwal RS, Singh A, Ferrari A, et al. The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:148–61.
Dunne M, Sun J, Nguyen D, Thai TT, Loan K, Dixon J. The influence of educational pressure on the mental health of adolescents in East Asia: methods and tools for research. J Sci. 2010;61:109–22.
Huang J, Dang H, Cai Y, Liu J, Chen Q. Myopia and depression among middle school students in China-is there a mediating role for wearing eyeglasses? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:13031.
Zhu X, Meng J, Han C, Wu Q, Du Y, Qi J, et al. CCL2-mediated inflammatory pathogenesis underlies high myopia-related anxiety. Cell Discov. 2023;9:94.
Li D, Chan VF, Virgili G, Piyasena P, Negash H, Whitestone N, et al. Impact of vision impairment and ocular morbidity and their treatment on depression and anxiety in children: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2022;129:1152–70.
Yong KL, Gong T, Nongpiur ME, How AC, Lee HK, Cheng L, et al. Myopia in Asian subjects with primary angle closure: implications for glaucoma trends in East Asia. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:1566–71.
Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB. Prevalence and time trends of myopia in children and adolescents in China: a systemic review and meta-analysis. RETINA. 2020;40:399.
Emdin CA, Khera AV, Kathiresan S. Mendelian randomization. JAMA. 2017;318:1925–6.
Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV, Kang H, Morrison J, Munafò MR, et al. Mendelian randomization. Nat Rev Methods Prim. 2022;2:1–21.
Choquet H, Khawaja AP, Jiang C, Yin J, Melles RB, Glymour MM, et al. Association between myopic refractive error and primary open-angle glaucoma: a 2-Sample Mendelian randomization study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140:864–71.
Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JAC, Timpson N, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med. 2008;27:1133–63.
Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipilä TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. 2023;613:508–18.
Otowa T, Hek K, Lee M, Byrne EM, Mirza SS, Nivard MG, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1391–9.
Elsworth B, Lyon M, Alexander T, Liu Y, Matthews P, Hallett J, et al. The MRC IEU OpenGWAS data infrastructure [Internet]. bioRxiv; 2020 [cited 2024 May 15]. p. 2020.08.10.244293. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.10.244293v1.
Wei D, Wang H, Huang L, Hou M, Liang HG, Shi X, et al. A Mendelian randomization study on the causal relationship between smoking, alcohol consumption, and the development of myopia and astigmatism. Sci Rep. 2024;14:1868.
Burgess S, Thompson SG, CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:755–64.
Palmer TM, Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sheehan NA, Tobias JH, Timpson NJ, et al. Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012;21:223–42.
Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V, Baird D, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018;7:e34408.
Gill D, Efstathiadou A, Cawood K, Tzoulaki I, Dehghan A. Education protects against coronary heart disease and stroke independently of cognitive function: evidence from Mendelian randomization. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:1468–77.
Hemani G, Bowden J, Davey Smith G. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:R195–208.
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:512–25.
Hartwig FP, Davey Smith G, Bowden J. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:1985–98.
Hartwig FP, Davies NM, Hemani G, Davey Smith G. Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1717–26.
Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013;37:658–65.
Shi Q, Wang Q, Wang Z, Lu J, Wang R. Systemic inflammatory regulators and proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1088778.
Yuan S, Kim JH, Xu P, Wang Z. Causal association between celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1057253.
Curtin F, Schulz P. Multiple correlations and Bonferroni’s correction. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44:775–7.
Pan W, Zhou L, Han R, Du X, Chen W, Jiang T. Causal associations between kidney function and aortic valve stenosis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis. Ren Fail. 2024;46:2417742.
Deng MG, Liu F, Liang Y, Wang K, Nie JQ, Liu J. Association between frailty and depression: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eadi3902.
Sanderson E. Multivariable Mendelian randomization and mediation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2021;11:a038984.
Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R, Surendran P, Burgess S, Danesh J, et al. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4851–3.
Yavorska OO, Burgess S. MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:1734–9.
Zhong T, Huang YQ, Wang G. The causal association of cheese intake with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Arch Med Sci. 2024;20:1930–42.
Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012;379:1739–48.
Croll M, Croll LJ. Emotional Glaucoma*. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960;49:297–305.
Jampel HD, Frick KD, Janz NK, Wren PA, Musch DC, Rimal R, et al. Depression and mood indicators in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:238–244.e1.
Mabuchi F, Yoshimura K, Kashiwagi K, Shioe K, Yamagata Z, Kanba S, et al. High prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:552.
Sittivarakul W, Wongkot P. Anxiety and depression among patients with uveitis and ocular inflammatory disease at a Tertiary Center in Southern Thailand: vision-related quality of life, sociodemographics, and clinical characteristics associated. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27:731–42.
Pingault JB, O’Reilly PF, Schoeler T, Ploubidis GB, Rijsdijk F, Dudbridge F. Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:566–80.
Davies NM, Holmes MV, Smith GD. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ. 2018;362:k601.
Greco M FD, Minelli C, Sheehan NA, Thompson JR. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome. Stat Med. 2015;34:2926–40.
Acknowledgements
We want to acknowledge the participants and investigators of the FinnGen study.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82070994, 82371089), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2022YFC3502503).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Shengsong Xu: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Formal Analysis; Xiao Wang: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft; Jinyi Xu: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft; Xianghua Tang: Formal Analysis, Visualization; Wenlong Hao: Resources, Visualization; Chuqi Xiang: Data curation, Formal Analysis; Xingyu Lei: Data curation, Formal Analysis; Mengyi Wang: Supervision, Writing – review & editing; Xiao Yang: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, S., Wang, X., Xu, J. et al. Causal relationships between depression, anxiety, and myopia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Eye 39, 2204–2210 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03841-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03841-y


