Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Epiretinal membrane formation following laser photocoagulation for peripheral retinal degeneration: incidence and risk factors

Abstract

Purpose

Laser photocoagulation remains the most common treatment for peripheral retinal degeneration. However, potential side effects, particularly inflammation and gliosis, raise concerns about an increased risk of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation. This study aims to further investigate the association between laser photocoagulation and ERM formation and identify associated risk factors.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who underwent retinal laser photocoagulation for peripheral retinal degeneration. Clinical data including medical history, ophthalmic examinations during follow-up, and details of the laser photocoagulation, were recorded. Binary regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for ERM formation, including age, ocular findings, and laser parameters.

Results

Among the 726 eyes, 32 eyes (4.41%) developed ERM during a follow-up period of 29.7 ± 17.2 months. Risk factors included older age (53.9 ± 11.1 vs. 36.6 ± 17.3 years, P < 0.001), presence of lattice degeneration (62.5% vs. 40.3%, P < 0.001), greater number of laser spots (390.1 ± 171.9 vs. 284.8 ± 156.4, P < 0.001), higher total laser energy (22.5 ± 10.8J vs. 13.6 ± 11.9J, P < 0.001), wider extent of laser coverage (4.47 ± 3.38 vs. 3.08 ± 2.10 clock hours, P = 0.028), and shorter distance between the laser and the fovea (7.50 ± 1.72 vs. 8.36 ± 2.16 disc diameters, P = 0.017). Further regression analysis identified age (OR 1.071, 95% CI 1.040–1.102), number of laser spots (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.001–1.005), and extent of laser coverage (OR 1.178, 95% CI 1.025–1.354) as independent risk factors for ERM development.

Conclusions

Peripheral retinal laser photocoagulation does not significantly increase the incidence of ERM. However, careful control of the number and extent of laser applications may help minimize potential damage to the macula.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All of the data and materials will be available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Lewis H. Peripheral retinal degenerations and the risk of retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:155–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta D, Ching J, Tornambe PE. Clinically undetected retinal breaks causing retinal detachment: a review of options for management. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018;63:579–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Argon laser scatter photocoagulation for prevention of neovascularization and vitreous hemorrhage in branch vein occlusion. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:34–41.

  4. Tornambe PE, Hilton GF. Results and complications in treated retinal breaks. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimura M, Yasuda K, Nakazawa T, Abe T, Shiono T, Iida T, et al. Panretinal photocoagulation induces pro-inflammatory cytokines and macular thickening in high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:1617–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Belokopytov M, Belkin M, Dubinsky G, Epstein Y, Rosner M. Development and recovery of laser-induced retinal lesion in rats. Retina. 2010;30:662–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V, Reibaldi M, Torrisi B, Reibaldi A. Prophylactic treatment of the fellow eye of patients with retinal detachment: a retrospective study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy SV, Husain D. Panretinal photocoagulation: a review of complications. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33:83–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saran BR, Brucker AJ. Macular epiretinal membrane formation and treated retinal breaks. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:480–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson DM, Norton EW. Long-term follow-up of treated retinal breaks. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;75:395–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Romem M, Singer L. Long-term follow-up of photocoagulated retinal breaks. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978;62:240–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Verdaguer J, Vaisman M. Treatment of symptomatic retinal breaks. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;87:783–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Combs JL, Welch RB. Retinal breaks without detachment: natural history, management and long term follow-up. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1982;80:64–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vatne HO, Syrdalen P. Prophylactic argon laser photocoagulation in retinal detachment fellow eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1982;60:505–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mester U, Volker B, Kroll P, Berg P. Complications of prophylactic argon laser treatment of retinal breaks and degenerations in 2000 eyes. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19:482–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Govetto A, Lalane RA 3rd, Sarraf D, Figueroa MS, Hubschman JP. Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:99–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth AM, Foos RY. Surface wrinkling retinopathy in eyes enucleated at autopsy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971;75:1047–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraushar MF, Morse PH. The relationship between retina surgery and preretinal macular fibrosis. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19:843–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sebag J, Buzney SM, Belyea DA, Kado M, McMeel JW, Trempe CL. Posterior vitreous detachment following panretinal laser photocoagulation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228:5–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbert C, Hiscott P, Unger W, Grierson I, McLeod D. Inflammation and the formation of epiretinal membranes. Eye. 1988;2:S140–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blackorby BL, Jeroudi AM, Blinder KJ, Shah GK. Epiretinal membrane formation after treatment of retinal breaks: cryoretinopexy versus laser retinopexy. Ophthalmol Retin. 2019;3:1087–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blindbaek S, Grauslund J. Prophylactic treatment of retinal breaks-a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fraser-Bell S, Guzowski M, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Mitchell P. Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell P, Smith W, Chey T, Wang JJ, Chang A. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes. The Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1033–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Klein R, Klein BE, Wang Q, Moss SE. The epidemiology of epiretinal membranes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:403–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao W, Chen X, Yan W, Zhu Z, He M. Prevalence and risk factors of epiretinal membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014644.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheung N, Tan SP, Lee SY, Cheung GCM, Tan G, Kumar N, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membrane: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Disease study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:371–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kawasaki R, Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Aung T, Saw SM, Wong TY, et al. Racial difference in the prevalence of epiretinal membrane between Caucasians and Asians. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1320–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aung KZ, Makeyeva G, Adams MK, Chong EW, Busija L, Giles GG, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of epiretinal membranes: the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Retina. 2013;33:1026–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Klein R, Varma R. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1732–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee GW, Lee SE, Han SH, Kim SJ, Kang SW. Characteristics of secondary epiretinal membrane due to peripheral break. Sci Rep. 2020;10:20881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Joshi M, Agrawal S, Christoforidis JB. Inflammatory mechanisms of idiopathic epiretinal membrane formation. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:192582.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Funding from the Shantou Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 221113086496943), and the Special Support Plan in Guangdong Province for Young Top Talents in Science and Technology Innovation

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception of the work (Z Huang); Acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work (B Xie, Y Lin, C Lin, X Qiu, and D Zheng); Drafting the work (B Xie); Revising the work critically for important intellectual content (Z Huang); supervision (D Huang, W Chen, and Z Huang); Final approval of the version to be published (all authors).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zijing Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This retrospective study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong approved this study. The study was deemed exempt from informed consent due to its retrospective design.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, B., Lin, Y., Lin, C. et al. Epiretinal membrane formation following laser photocoagulation for peripheral retinal degeneration: incidence and risk factors. Eye 39, 2768–2773 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03945-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03945-5

Search

Quick links