Abstract
Purpose
Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) is a rare but severe ocular emergency caused by haematogenous spread of infectious microorganisms. This study analyses clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, microbiological spectrum, and treatment outcomes of EE cases over a 14-year period, comparing findings with published data.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted on EE cases diagnosed at a tertiary care centre from 2010 to 2024. Data included demographics, clinical presentation, microbiology, diagnostics, treatment, and visual outcomes. Relevant literature was reviewed to contextualise findings and reflect on similarities and nuances in broader clinical experience.
Results
27 patients with EE were identified. Systemic comorbidities, including malignancies and immunosuppression, were common. Ocular symptoms were present in 77% of cases, while 22% were asymptomatic. The majority exhibited unilateral involvement. Blood cultures (BC) were performed in 77% of cases, with a positivity rate of 66%. Vitreous biopsies were conducted in nine cases, yielding a 66% positivity rate. Treatment included systemic antibiotics or antifungals, topical medications, and intravitreal therapy (81% of cases). Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was performed in 51% of cases, though only two underwent early PPV. Final BCVA varied widely, with 59% of eyes achieving functional recovery. 21% of cases resulted in phthisis bulbi or evisceration, and 18% of patients died during follow-up due to systemic illness.
Conclusion
EE presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with high risk of visual impairment and systemic morbidity. Early recognition, aggressive therapy, and timely surgery may improve outcomes. Further research is needed to establish standardised diagnostic and treatment guidelines for optimal management.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 18 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $14.39 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Sadiq MA, Hassan M, Agarwal A, Sarwar S, Toufeeq S, Soliman MK, et al. Endogenous endophthalmitis: diagnosis, management, and prognosis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2015;5:32.
Maling S, King C, Davies N. A British ophthalmological surveillance unit study on metastatic endogenous endophthalmitis. Eye. 2018;32:743–8.
Durand ML. Bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30:597–613.
Gajdzis M, Figuła K, Kamińska J, Kaczmarek R. Endogenous endophthalmitis-the clinical significance of the primary source of infection. J Clin Med. 2022;11:1183.
Connell PP, O'neill EC, Fabinyi D, Islam FM, Buttery R, McCombe M, et al. Endogenous endophthalmitis: 10-year experience at a tertiary referral centre. Eye. 2011;25:66–72.
Danielescu C, Anton N, Stanca HT, Munteanu M. Endogenous endophthalmitis: a review of case series published between 2011 and 2020. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:8869590.
Sridhar J, Flynn Jr HW, Kuriyan AE, Miler D, Albini T. Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis: risk factors, clinical features, and treatment outcomes in mold and yeast infections. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2013;3:60.
Vilela RC, Vilela L, Vilela P, Vilela R, Motta R, Pôssa AP, et al. Etiological agents of fungal endophthalmitis: diagnosis and management. Int Ophthalmol. 2014;34:707–21.
Chien KH, Huang KH, Chung CH, Hsieh YH, Liang CM, Chang YH, et al. The impact of diabetes mellitus medication on the incidence of endogenous endophthalmitis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0227442.
Vaziri K, Pershing S, Albini TA, Moshfeghi DM, Moshfeghi AA. Risk factors predictive of endogenous endophthalmitis among hospitalized patients with hematogenous infections in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:498–504.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). European Drug Report 2023: trends and developments. 2023. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2023_en
de Esteban Maciñeira E, Bande MF, Soberanes-Perez JI, Paniagua L, Golzarri MF, Fromow-Guerra J, et al. Two-decade retrospective analysis of endogenous endophthalmitis in Spain and Mexico: a comprehensive study. J Clin Med. 2024;13:4990.
Ros-Sánchez E, Oliver-Gutierrez D, Buck P, Goncharova T, Distefano L, Kirkegaard-Biosca E, et al. Purpureocillium lilacinum-related endophthalmitis: case report. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2024;14:27.
Thompson KN, Alshaikhsalama AM, Wang AL. Evaluation of the clinical course of endogenous endophthalmitis. J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023;7:389–96.
Breazzano MP, Bond III JB, Bearelly S, Kim DH, Donahue SP, Lum F, et al. American Academy of Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendations on screening for endogenous Candida endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2022;129:73–76.
Lingappan A, Wykoff CC, Albini TA, Miller D, Pathengay A, Davis JL, et al. Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis: causative organisms, management strategies, and visual acuity outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:162–6.e1.
Lamaris GA, Esmaeli B, Chamilos G, Desai A, Chemaly RF, Raad II, et al. Fungal endophthalmitis in a tertiary care cancer center: a review of 23 cases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27:343–47.
Silpa-Archa S, Ponwong A, Preble JM, Foster CS. Culture-positive endogenous endophthalmitis: an eleven-year retrospective study in the central region of Thailand. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2018;26:533–42.
Wu ZH, Chan RP, Luk FO, Liu DT, Chan CK, Lam DS, et al. Review of clinical features, microbiological spectrum, and treatment outcomes of endogenous endophthalmitis over an 8-year period. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:265078.
Dedieu D, Contejean A, Gastli N, Marty-Reboul J, Poupet H, Brezin A, et al. Endogenous endophthalmitis: new insights from a 12-year cohort study. Int J Infect Dis. 2024;146:107116.
Feng HL, Robbins CB, Fekrat S. A nine-year analysis of practice patterns, microbiologic yield, and clinical outcomes in cases of presumed infectious endophthalmitis. Ophthalmol Retin. 2020;4:555–59.
Ratra D, et al. Endogenous endophthalmitis: a 10-year retrospective study at a tertiary hospital in South India. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2015;4:286–92.
Nakhwa C. Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis treated with intravitreal caspofungin in a COVID-19 recovered patient: a case report. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:3759–61.
Garrido-Marin M, Kirkegaard Biosca E, Boixadera A, Fischer Fernandez R, Sánchez Vela L, Pardo Aranda A, et al. Multiresistant Candida endophthalmitis treated with intravitreal caspofungin: a case report. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2024;32:858–62.
Zhang YQ, Wang WJ. Treatment outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy for endogenous endophthalmitis. Retina. 2005;25:746–50.
Sallam A, Taylor SR, Khan A, McCluskey P, Lynn WA, Manku K, et al. Factors determining visual outcome in endogenous Candida endophthalmitis. Retina. 2012;32:1129–34.
Sheu SJ, Kung YH, Wu TT, Chang FP, Horng YH. Risk factors for endogenous endophthalmitis secondary to Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess: 20-year experience in Southern Taiwan. Retina. 2011;31:2026–31.
Jackson TL, Paraskevopoulos T, Georgalas I. Systematic review of 342 cases of endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59:627–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ER was responsible for collecting the clinical data, drafting the manuscript, and coordinating the overall study. RG and LG collected clinical data from all cases included in the manuscript. DO performed the statistical analysis and contributed to drafting the manuscript. TG and PB gathered the graphical material, reviewed the remaining data from the different cases, and contributed to revising the manuscript. LD, EK, TG and PB critically reviewed and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for Authorship. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients’ consent was obtained.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ros-Sánchez, E., Oliver-Gutiérrez, D., García-Risco, R. et al. Endogenous endophthalmitis in a tertiary referral centre: a 14-year case series with comparative perspective. Eye 40, 123–133 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04121-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-04121-5

