Table 2 The 28-feature definition proposed by the Regression Working Group of the Down Syndrome Medical Interest Group: unexplained regression in Down syndrome (URDS) compared with age-matched controls with Down syndrome

From: Unexplained regression in Down syndrome: 35 cases from an international Down syndrome database

 

All

Medical evaluation negative

URDS (N = 35)

Control (N = 35)

p valuea

URDS (N = 11)

Control (N = 11)

p valuea

 

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Core feature (…with an onset of three months or greater)

Adaptive function

   Social skills: withdrawal, avoidance, isolation; time spent alone

33

94%

1

3%

<0.001

10

91%

1

9%

0.004

   Functional ADLs: loss of acquired skills; dependent

31

91%

1

3%

<0.001

11

100%

1

9%

0.002

    Speech: reduced, infrequent; whisper, monosyllabic, or mute

31

89%

2

6%

<0.001

10

91%

1

9%

0.004

Cognitive–executive function

   Attention: atypical, odd; gaze aversion, poor eye contact, or impaired ocular control

32

91%

1

3%

<0.001

9

82%

1

9%

0.008

   Functional skills: loss, confused, disorganized; unable to function at school/job

30

86%

0

0%

<0.001

11

100%

0

0%

<0.001

   Procedural memory: less able to perform or performs with assistance needed, with regard to ADL routines or favorite activities

30

86%

1

3%

<0.001

11

100%

1

9%

0.002

   Learning memory: diminished working memory; not processing or learning

28

80%

0

0%

<0.001

10

91%

0

0%

0.002

   Planning, organizing: not goal directed, disorganized

27

77%

0

0%

<0.001

10

91%

0

0%

0.002

   Declarative memory: forgetful and confused with regard to people, places, and events

20

59%

0

0%

<0.001

8

73%

0

0%

0.008

Motor control

   Initiation–motivation: abulia, avolition, mutism

28

80%

0

0%

<0.001

9

82%

0

0%

0.004

   Stereotyped movements: tics, stereotypies

20

57%

0

0%

<0.001

9

82%

0

0%

0.004

   Catatonia

19

56%

0

0%

<0.001

5

45%

0

0%

0.063

   Extrapyramidal: bradykinesia, freezing, cogwheel rigidity, tremor

17

50%

0

0%

<0.001

4

36%

0

0%

0.125

Common feature

Behavior

   Internalizing: apathy, withdrawal, mood, stereotype, SIB

32

91%

1

3%

<0.001

9

82%

0

0%

0.004

   Externalizing: hyperactivity, irritable, disruptive, agitated

15

43%

5

14%

0.031

5

45%

2

18%

0.375

Mental health

   Mood, emotion, self-regulation: depression, compulsions, psychosis, PTSD, anxiety, panic, ASD/DSDD

31

89%

3

9%

<0.001

9

82%

0

0%

0.004

   Sleep disturbance: Insomnia, circadian shift

26

74%

3

9%

<0.001

9

82%

1

9%

0.021

   Transition/change causing emotional distress in past 1 year

17

50%

4

11%

<0.001

5

50%

1

9%

0.063

   Appetite: anorexia, weight loss

17

50%

0

0%

<0.001

5

50%

0

0%

0.063

   Incontinence: urine, feces

12

35%

1

3%

0.003

5

45%

0

0%

0.063

   Trauma/loss/grief, causing emotional distress in past 1 year

10

29%

3

9%

0.065

2

18%

0

0%

0.500

   Puberty, causing emotional distress in past 1 year

8

23%

1

3%

0.039

3

27%

0

0%

0.250

   Illness/hospitalization, causing emotional distress in past 1 year

8

23%

1

3%

0.039

4

36%

0

0%

0.125

   Sleep apnea, seizures: evidence on PSG, EEG

5

15%

10

29%

0.388

1

10%

3

27%

>0.99

   Other inflammatory, autoimmune condition

5

14%

3

9%

0.727

2

18%

0

0%

0.500

   Systemic illness: pain, surgery

5

14%

2

6%

0.625

2

18%

1

10%

N/A

   Autonomic: syncope, pallor, sweating

2

6%

1

3%

>0.99

0

0%

0

0%

   Vision, hearing: acute loss or deterioration

1

3%

1

3%

>0.99

0

0%

0

0%

  1. N = # of patients with this feature present; % = # of patients with feature present ÷ # of patients with response to this feature.
  2. ADL activities of daily living, ASD/DSDD autism spectrum disorder/Down syndrome disintegrative disorder, EEG electroencephalogram, N/A  insufficient information available, PSG polysomnogram, PTSD posttraumatic stress disorder, SIB self-injurious behavior.
  3. aGeneralized mixed models for paired comparisons; this is equivalent to McNemar’s test for binary measures and a paired t-test for continuous measures with the addition of a random effect of site.