Fig. 2: The timeline for preemptive pharmacogenomics (PGx) panel testing and reactive PGx panel testing strategies vs. usual care. | Genetics in Medicine

Fig. 2: The timeline for preemptive pharmacogenomics (PGx) panel testing and reactive PGx panel testing strategies vs. usual care.

From: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacogenomic panel testing in cardiovascular disease management: preemptive, reactive, or none?

Fig. 2

For the preemptive testing strategy, patients undergo genetic testing before the disease is diagnosed (drug therapy is indicated) and treatment is initiated. With the known genetic variations, treatment can be initiated directly once the patient develops the disease and the drug is indicated. However, not everyone will develop disease and therefore PGx testing may be wasteful in these healthy individuals. For the reactive testing strategy, patients undergo genetic testing after drug therapy is indicated and standard treatment is initiated. Upon receiving the genetic information, individualized treatment is initiated. In this way, genetic testing is only given to patients who are prescribed at least one of the three medications (i.e., clopidogrel, warfarin, or statin). However, once the results are ready, further treatment could be initiated immediately after the disease is diagnosed and the drug is indicated. No genetic testing is performed under the usual care strategy.

Back to article page