Table 4 Predicted factor scores for the additive and the dominance effects of the top 15 hybrids based on best linear unbiased predictions (BLUP) for GY (t/ha) from an MET analysis with additive and dominance effects (model AD)

Hybrid	Background	BLUP^a		Additive effect		Dominance effect
		Additive	Dominance	Factor 1	Factor 2	Factor 1	Factor 2
42	D_F	0.81	0.68	0.53	1.55	1.17	−1.18
97	D_F	0.85	0.63	0.66	1.58	2.10	−0.05
44	D_F	0.81	0.63	0.39	1.55	1.45	−0.52
283	F_F	0.91	0.51	−0.22	1.51	0.95	−1.59
210	C_F	1.21	0.20	0.28	2.31	0.59	−0.81
132	D_F	0.77	0.64	0.40	1.49	1.97	−0.48
120	D_F	0.84	0.55	−0.21	1.33	1.17	−0.36
185	D_F	0.57	0.77	−0.31	0.92	2.12	−0.83
11	D_F	0.27	1.03	−0.45	0.48	2.51	−1.29
90	D_F	0.87	0.42	0.11	1.47	0.82	−0.70
239	D_F	0.83	0.44	1.16	1.50	0.72	−0.94
181	D_F	0.66	0.60	0.69	1.16	1.55	−0.79
291	D_F	0.78	0.48	0.44	1.58	0.46	−1.39
48	D_F	0.65	0.60	−0.72	1.08	1.31	−1.48
138	D_F	0.60	0.65	0.22	1.18	1.46	−0.75

For all trials, factor scores are rotated with the Varimax rotation. Background is D_F (dent × flint), C_F (c × flint), F_F (flint × flint)
^aEstimated genotypic values (additive plus dominance effects) from AD models considering all trials

Quick links

Search