Table 6 Application of the Vane-Wright et al. (1991) approach using demographic, genetic, and phylogenetic criteria for attributing conservation priority scores for the studied Pennisetum glaucum L. landrace populations from coastal North African region

From: Conservation priorities for endangered coastal North African Pennisetum glaucum L. landrace populations as inferred from phylogenetic considerations and population structure analysis

 

Standarized genetic data

Phylogentic data

PTI st

Summary

Priority

Population

Size st

An st

Ap st

Ho st

He st

F st

D st

PG

BTW

E

PTI %

Haouaria

0.5

0.855

0.4

0.939

0.868

1

0.816

2

10.5

2

20

1

6.378

98.41%

Hammem Jebli

0.5

0.971

0.2

0.913

0.923

0.26

0.705

3

7

1.33

13.33

0.666

5.138

79.27%

Hammem Laghzaz

0.444

0.971

1

1

0.933

0.756

0.705

3

7

1.33

13.33

0.666

6.475

99.90%

Kairouan

0.751

1

0.8

0.998

1

0.276

0.126

4

5.25

1

10

0.5

5.451

84.10%

Chebika

0.5

0.884

0.6

0.994

0.954

0.449

0.126

4

5.25

1

10

0.5

5.007

77.25%

Mahdia

1

0.739

0.4

0.953

0.946

0.279

0.394

3

7

1.33

13.33

0.666

5.377

82.96%

Medenine

0.4

0.985

0.8

0.953

0.919

0.424

1

2

10.5

2

20

1

6.481

100%

Total

       

21

52.5

10

    
  1. % PTI taxic diversity index: the contribution of each population in the total diversity (for example for population 1: % PTI = E ×100/E)
  2. An allele number, Ap private allele number, Ho observed heterozygosity, He expected heterozygosity, F inbreeding index, D genetic distance, st standardize, PG population grouping, BPW basic population weight, E the standardization of BPW between smaller (minimum) values
Back to article page