Table 2 Summary of nucleotide (π) and haplotype (h) diversity, population growth parameters Θw (Watterson 1975), g, Fu’s Fs and Tajima’s D for mtDNA control region sequences
From: Comparing genetic diversity and demographic history in co-distributed wild South American camelids
Population groups | h ± SD | π ± SD | Θw ± SD | Θg = var ± SD | g ± SD | F s | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Guanaco populations | 0.934 ± 0.01 | 0.017 ± 0.01 | 0.014 ± 0.01 | 0.131 ± 0.04 | 495.16 ± 100 | −2.2097 | 1.060 |
Northern Guanaco | 0.884 ± 0.04 | 0.015 ± 0.01 | 0.013 ± 0.01 | 0.076 ± 0.03 | 378.48 ± 96 | −0.208 | 1.216 |
Southern Guanaco | 0.871 ± 0.05 | 0.013 ± 0.01 | 0.017 ± 0.01 | 0.012 ± 0.05 | 467.18 ± 106 | −1.3570 | −0.187 |
All vicuña populations | 0.775 ± 0.03 | 0.009 ± 0.01 | 0.019 ± 0.01 | 0.045 ± 0.01 | 173.93 ± 55 | −2.3944 | −0.535 |
Northern vicuña | 0.555 ± 0.06 | 0.006 ± 0.004 | 0.009 ± 0.01 | 0.025 ± 0.01 | 539.76 ± 216 | 0.7464 | 0.540 |
Southern vicuña | 0.868 ± 0.02 | 0.012 ± 0.01 | 0.019 ± 0.01 | 0.038 ± 0.01 | 138.37 ± 52 | −0.8181 | −0.137 |
