Table 1 Terms and statistics for models investigating the influence of mating status (virgin or mated), in the context of matings within genotypic backgrounds, on components of female decorated cricket immunity.

From: Male and female genotype and a genotype-by-genotype interaction mediate the effects of mating on cellular but not humoral immunity in female decorated crickets

Modeled responses

Factors

Statistics

(a) Antibacterial activity (log-transformed)

 

F

d.f.

p

Generation

0.024

3

0.9948

Body size

5.751

1

0.0179

Female genotype

0.837

2

0.4355

Mating status

2.688

1

0.1036

Mating status × female genotype

0.169

2

0.7326

  

F

d.f.

p

(b) Total PO activity

Generation

0.236

3

0.8712

 

Body size

0.004

1

0.9470

 

Female genotype

2.208

2

0.1141

Mating status

1.262

1

0.2635

Mating status × female genotype

0.312

2

0.9616

  

χ2

d.f.

p

(c) Hemocyte number (negative binomial with log link)

Generation

0.399

3

0.9404

Body size

1.065

1

0.3020

Female genotype

16.963

2

0.0002

Mating status

2.979

1

0.0843

Mating status×female genotype

10.524

2

0.0052

  

χ2

d.f.

p

(d) Microaggregations (negative binomial with log link)

Generation

2.593

3

0.4587

Body size

0.313

1

0.5756

Female genotype

6.767

2

0.0339

Mating status

1.760

1

0.1847

Mating status × female genotype

2.349

2

0.3090

  1. Bold terms were retained in the final model.