Table 2 Terms and statistics for models investigating the influence of male genotype, female genotype, and their interaction on components of decorated cricket female immunity post mating.
Modeled responses | Factors | Statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Antibacterial activity (log-transformed) | F | d.f. | p | |
Generation | 1.268 | 3 | 0.2867 | |
Body size | 4.083 | 1 | 0.0447 | |
Female genotype | 1.125 | 2 | 0.3270 | |
Male genotype | 0.539 | 2 | 0.5844 | |
Male genotype × female genotype | 0.659 | 4 | 0.6214 | |
F | d.f. | p | ||
(b) Total PO activity | Generation | 0.508 | 3 | 0.6770 |
Body size | 1.911 | 1 | 0.1685 | |
Female genotype | 2.417 | 2 | 0.0920 | |
Male genotype | 0.093 | 2 | 0.9114 | |
Male genotype × female genotype | 1.497 | 4 | 0.2048 | |
χ2 | d.f. | p | ||
(c) Hemocyte number (negative binomial with log link) | Generation | 4.610 | 3 | 0.2027 |
Body size | 0.439 | 1 | 0.5077 | |
Female genotype | 28.912 | 2 | <0.0001 | |
Male genotype | 14.861 | 2 | 0.0006 | |
Male genotype × female genotype | 11.534 | 4 | 0.0212 | |
χ2 | d.f. | p | ||
(d) Microaggregations (negative binomial with log link) | Generation | 5.165 | 3 | 0.1601 |
Body size | <0.001 | 1 | 0.9975 | |
Female genotype | 0.519 | 2 | 0.7715 | |
Male genotype | 8.463 | 2 | 0.0145 | |
Male genotype × female genotype | 0.476 | 4 | 0.9758 | |