Table 4 Bottleneck probability test results (TPM: two-phase mutation model) and M-ratio values based on ten nuclear microsatellite loci.

From: From micro- to macroevolution: insights from a Neotropical bromeliad with high population genetic structure adapted to rock outcrops

Population

TPMa

M ratio

STES

0.984

0.961

CARMG

0.884

0.877

CAPES

1.000

0.947

MTMG

0.461

1.045

DESRJ

0.995

0.878

SMARJ

0.188

0.767

NFLRJ

0.973

0.914

NFRJ

0.161

1.117

MPPR

0.947

0.934

IBIMG-fla

0.527

0.648

IBIMG-flo

0.326

0.989

IBIMG-ceu

0.884

0.999

TERJ-co

0.385

1.029

TERJ-fla

1.000

1.065

GARJ

0.903

0.850

MFSP

0.995

0.860

PARJ

0.784

0.781

PISP

0.787

0.835

SSSP

0.918

0.695

PGSP-fla

0.994

0.885

PGSP-sp

0.064

0.822

ATISP

0.539

0.632

BESP

0.918

0.772

JURSP

0.813

0.994

MCPR

0.988

0.749

  1. aSignificant value for P < 0.05.
  2. A population is considered to have undergone a bottleneck if its M-ratio value falls below the threshold of the critical M ratio (Mc = 0.771). In bold are populations in which bottlenecks were detected according to Garza and Williamson (2001).
Back to article page