Table 2 Regime-specific between-trait (partial) correlation estimates among length, CTmax, and hct, at either the genetic (RG), environmental (RE), or phenotypic (RP) levels, and between regimes for RG, based on bivariate animal models that account for population (wild, wild-domesticated, domesticated), temperature regime (cold, optimum, warm), population-by-regime effects, and additional covariates (for CTmax: hour of day; for hct: date, population-by-date).

From: Genetic variation for upper thermal tolerance diminishes within and between populations with increasing acclimation temperature in Atlantic salmon

Regime

RG (95% CI)

RE (95% CI)

RP (95% CI)

Length, CTmax

Cold

−0.72 (−1.12 to −0.32)

0.24 (0.370.84)

−0.53 (−0.96 to −0.10)

Optimum

−0.86 (−1.37 to −0.34)

0.51 (0.17–1.19)

−0.42 (−0.85–0.01)

Warm

−0.71 (−1.05 to −0.37)

0.18 (−0.39–0.74)

−0.40 (−0.68 to −0.13)

Cold.Optimum

−0.78 (−1.18 to −0.39)

  

Optimum.Warm

−0.78 (−1.16 to −0.40)

  

Cold.Warm

−0.68 (−1.08 to −0.28)

  

Length, Hct

Cold

0.55 (0.071.02)

−0.18 (−0.90–0.54)

0.45 (−0.01–0.91)

Optimum

0.15 (−0.97–1.27)

−0.12 (−0.37–0.14)

−0.02 (−0.36–0.33)

Warm

0.29 (−0.28–0.86)

−0.03 (−0.42–0.35)

0.19 (−0.15–0.54)

Cold.Optimum

−0.01 (−0.75–0.72)

  

Optimum.Warm

0.27 (−0.41–0.96)

  

Cold.Warm

0.67 (0.261.08)

  

CTmax, Hct

Cold

−0.51 (−0.97 to −0.04)

−0.08 (−0.51–0.36)

−0.46 (–0.9 to −0.02)

Optimum

−0.24 (−0.88–0.40)

0.74 (−0.56–2.04)

−0.02 (−0.63–0.60)

Warm

0.22 (−0.39–0.83)

−0.27 (−0.88–0.35)

0.13 (−0.3–0.56)

Cold.Optimum

−0.27 (−0.87–0.33)

  

Optimum.Warm

0.09 (−0.58–0.76)

  

Cold.Warm

−0.24 (−0.83–0.34)

  
  1. Correlations between CTmax and hct are also controlled for length. Bolded values signify correlations with an approximate 95% confidence interval excluding zero.