Table 2 Mixed models testing the dispersal behaviour of offspring of reciprocal crosses within and between T. castaneum lines experimentally selected for high and low dispersal propensity.

From: Genetic architecture of dispersal behaviour in the post-harvest pest and model organism Tribolium castaneum

 

Estimate

SE

p

(Intercept)

63.93

3.33

<0.001

Cross type [Hm-Lf]

(reference)

  

Cross type [Hm-Hf]

22.81

2.47

<0.001

Cross type [Lm-Hf]

3.47

2.47

0.162

Cross type [Lm-Lf]

−21.16

2.47

<0.001

Sex

0.83

1.74

0.636

Cross type [Hm-Lf] x sex [female]

(reference)

  

Cross type [Hm-Hf] x sex

3.75

4.98

0.453

Cross type [Lm-Hf] x sex

0.31

4.98

0.95

Cross type [Lm-Lf] x sex

2.5

4.98

0.62

  1. Above the dashed line results are from a model fitting the individual effects of predictors, below the line results are from an equivalent model fitting the interaction between sex and cross type, with ‘Hm-Lf’ as the reference category. In both, we modelled the random intercept of line ID (model 1: Var = 116.26, SD = 10.78; model 2: Var = 116.26, SD = 10.78).
Back to article page