Table 3 General linear models of the dispersal behaviour of offspring of reciprocal crosses within and between simulated lines selected for high and low dispersal propensity, under sex-linked and unsex-linked genetic architectures.

From: Genetic architecture of dispersal behaviour in the post-harvest pest and model organism Tribolium castaneum

 

Sex-linked

Unsex-linked

   
 

Est

SE

p

Est

SE

p

(Intercept)

34.46

1.37

<0.001

51.04

0.69

<0.001

Cross type [HmLf]

(reference)

     

Cross type [HmHf]

45.58

1.73

<0.001

28.33

0.87

<0.001

Cross type [LmHf]

30.26

1.73

<0.001

−0.66

0.87

0.447

Cross type [LmLf]

−14.94

1.73

<0.001

−30.19

0.87

<0.001

Sex

0.48

1.26

0.695

−0.15

0.61

0.807

Cross type [HmLf] x [female]

(reference)

     

Cross type [HmHf] x male

29.32

1.71

<0.001

−2.62

1.73

0.13

Cross type [LmHf] x male

59.96

1.71

<0.001

1.8

1.73

0.298

Cross type [LmLf] x male

30.08

1.71

<0.001

0.54

1.73

0.755

  1. Above the dashed line results are from a model fitting the individual effects of predictors, below the line results are from an equivalent model fitting the interaction between sex and cross type, with ‘HmLf’ as the reference category (model 1, sex-linked: Var = 116.26, SD = 10.78; model 2: Var = 116.26, SD = 10.78).