Fig. 2: Anopheles farauti microsatellite population structure and relationships—Bayesian clustering (STRUCTURE) and Jost’s D. | Heredity

Fig. 2: Anopheles farauti microsatellite population structure and relationships—Bayesian clustering (STRUCTURE) and Jost’s D.

From: Genetic and geographic population structure in the malaria vector, Anopheles farauti, provides a candidate system for pioneering confinable gene-drive releases

Fig. 2

A Shows STRUCTURE results for the full dataset (K3). B Shows results for STRUCTURE analyses run on the three groups identified by STRUCTURE analysis shown in (A). Top panel (B) shows results from Group 1 at K4. Middle panel (B) shows results from Group 2 at K4. Bottom panel (B) shows results from Group 3 at K8. Each vertical bar represents an individual and bar colours show percentage ancestry assigned by the model. C Shows a neighbour joining tree generated from pairwise Jost’s D values as a way to visualise relatedness between populations. Population abbreviations and sites are used as in Table 1 and through the manuscript: NT Northern Territory, Australia, Qld Queensland, Australia, TI Torres Strait Islands, sNG southern New Guinea, wNG western New Guinea, sPP southern Papuan Peninsula, nPP northern Papuan Peninsula, nNG northern New Guinea, Manus Manus Island, Bou Bougainville Island, Choi Choiseul Island, Isa Santa Isabel Island, Ngg Nggela Island, Gua Guadalcanal Island, Ulawa Ulawa Island, Tem Temotu, Van Vanuatu.

Back to article page