Fig. 4: Local adaptation results based on RDA analysis (based on putatively adaptive SNPs that are >2.5 st. dev. from the mean loadings). | Heredity

Fig. 4: Local adaptation results based on RDA analysis (based on putatively adaptive SNPs that are >2.5 st. dev. from the mean loadings).

From: A decision-making framework to maximise the evolutionary potential of populations - Genetic and genomic insights from the common midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans) at its range limits

Fig. 4: Local adaptation results based on RDA analysis (based on putatively adaptive SNPs that are >2.5 st. dev. from the mean loadings).

Sampling locality numbers follow Table 1. A Warm/cold/intermediate individual categorisation based on RDA positions relative to environmental predictors (bioclim_5, bioclim_18). B Moist/rough/intermediate individual categorisation based on RDA positions relative to topographic predictors (Compound Topographic Index, Terrain Ruggedness Index). C Spatial mapping of local adaptations and D to environmental predictors (bioclim 5, bioclim 18) and topograpic predictors (Compound Topographic indexbased on ddRAD-seq data). D Spatial mapping of local adaptations to topographic predictors (Compound Topographic Index, Topographic Roughness Index) based on ddRAD-seq data. Spatial variation of each predictor across the study landscape can be found in Fig. S6.

Back to article page