Table 2 Genetic and genomic diversity of Alytes obstetricans.

From: A decision-making framework to maximise the evolutionary potential of populations - Genetic and genomic insights from the common midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans) at its range limits

 

Microsatellites

 

ddRAD-seq

 

Sampling locality

N

PA

AR

HO

HE

FIS

lower

upper

N

PA

AR

HO

HE

FIS

Luegde (01)

19

 

1.8

0.2

0.2

−0.14

−0.35

0.06

      

Obernkirchen (02)

17

3

2.6

0.3

0.4

0.18

0.05

0.29

4(1)

0.145

1.34

0.40

0.23

−0.02

Helenenwiese (03)

20

 

1.4

0.1

0.1

0.23

−0.02

0.48

4

0.002

1.24

0.40

0.23

−0.06hris

Goettingen (05)

19

 

2.2

0.3

0.3

−0.1

−0.22

0.02

      

Silbersee (06)

15

 

2

0.3

0.3

−0.06

−0.23

0.12

      

Lutterhausen (08)*

21

 

2.1

0.2

0.3

0.32

0.18

0.45

2(2)

0.002

1.22

0.39

0.22

−0.05

Oedingen (10)

17

1

2.2

0.2

0.3

0.18

0.06

0.30

      

Thueste (11)

26

 

1.8

0.1

0.2

0.42

0.31

0.54

6

0.002

1.27

0.41

0.25

−0.06

Stolberg (14)

23

2

2.4

0.3

0.4

0.29

0.15

0.42

6

0.019

1.46

0.42

0.25

−0.05

Kleinberndten (15)

19

 

1.9

0.2

0.2

0.01

−0.16

0.18

      

Hainrode (16)

11

 

1.8

0.2

0.2

0.06

−0.23

0.42

      

Schierschwende (18)

25

 

1.8

0.3

0.3

0.07

−0.08

0.21

      

Deuna (19)

16

 

1.8

0.3

0.3

−0.11

−0.34

0.12

      

Herzogenrath (20)

12

 

1.5

0.1

0.1

−0.16

−0.4

0.08

6

0.012

1.24

0.40

0.25

−0.04

Vahlbruch (21)

13

 

1.5

0.1

0.2

0.48

−0.08

0.83

      

Salzhemmendorf (23)*

17

 

1.7

0.2

0.2

0.11

−0.14

0.37

2

0.006

1.47

0.44

0.23

0.01

Messingsberg (24)

16

 

2

0.2

0.3

0.44

0.28

0.57

      

Tuchtberg (25)

18

 

2.1

0.2

0.3

0.36

0.19

0.50

4

0.002

1.23

0.39

0.23

−0.06

Langenberg (28)

20

 

2

0.3

0.3

−0.18

−0.34

0.02

5(5)

0.006

1.33

0.39

0.24

−0.05

Wolfshagen (29)

18

 

2.2

0.2

0.3

0.16

−0.02

0.36

4

0.035

1.54

0.43

0.23

−0.01

Sickenberg (31)

18

1

2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.08

0.51

8

0.012

1.28

0.43

12

−0.06

Oberstreu (33)

        

6(1)

0.026

1.48

0.40

0.25

0.03

Bramburg (36)

        

12

0.002

1.31

0.40

0.26

−0.05

Boneburg (37)*

        

1(1)

0.004

1.11

0.40

0.20

0

  1. Sampling localities are numbered correspondingly in all figures, maps and manuscript text.
  2. N number of individuals included in the analysis (only localities with at least 10 individuals were used to estimate metrics for microsatellite data). For ddRAD-seq data, N represents numbers of individuals per locality retained for analyses, and numbers excluded (i.e. additional to the numbers retained, and not a subset of them) due to poor sequencing quality are in brackets. Asterisk represents localities where numbers of individuals used to calculate genetic diversity using ddRAD-seq data are <4 and thus should be interpreted with caution.
  3. AR mean allelic richness, HO observed heterozygosity, HE expected heterozygosity, PA private alleles (numbers of unique alleles for microsatellites, rarefied allele percentages for ddRAD-seq data). FIS inbreeding coefficient, and lower and upper Confidence Intervals (lower and upper).
  4. Inbreeding is significant (bold) when the confidence intervals exclude zero. ddRAD-seq data is calculated from variant SNP sites only; for all sites (fixed and variant) results are shown in Table S2.
Back to article page