Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Mitochondrial structure despite nuclear panmixia: sex-specific dispersal dictates population structure in sperm whales

Abstract

Marine mammals have high potential for dispersal, yet behavioral or environmental constraints can limit gene flow. This is true for the endangered sperm whale, Physeter macrocephalus, which has a global distribution and long-distance migrations. While previous studies revealed mitochondrial population structure with weak nuclear structure globally, genomic approaches examining this pattern have been limited. Understanding connectivity is critical for the management of this species due to population declines relative to pre-whaling numbers and increased recent anthropogenic stressors. We investigated connectivity between two regions, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and the western North Atlantic Ocean, using reduced representation genomic and mitochondrial control region sequencing of 73 sperm whales. Relatedness decreased with geographic distance, likely due to the presence of social groups and familial structure. Nuclear markers showed no population structure (FST = 0.001–0.008), while mitochondrial structure was high (FST = 0.36–0.65), consistent with male-biased dispersal and female philopatry. Female-only analyses showed higher differentiation for mitochondrial but not nuclear markers; male-only analyses revealed no structure. Across all samples, genetic diversity (nuclear: 0.0014; mitochondrial: 0.0017) and effective population size (Ne = 460) were low. Given this low diversity and evidence for partitioning of genetic variation, we recommend managers treat these two regions as distinct to preserve existing variation and promote resilience of this species. These results illustrate that despite the increased power of a genomic approach, it is essential to consider the biology of the species at hand and leverage both mitochondrial and nuclear markers to understand the genetic structure of threatened species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Collection sites for all samples.
Fig. 2: Pairwise relatedness between all individuals colored by the population origin of each individual.
Fig. 3: Nuclear panmixia across populations.
Fig. 4: Measures of genetic diversity for nuclear markers.
Fig. 5: mtDNA population structure across all individuals and subsets by sex.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw genomic data can be found on NCBI under bioproject PRJNA1189584. Code to run all analyses and metadata for samples, including NCBI accessions for mitochondrial data, can be found on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14715105.

References

  • Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K (2009) Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res 19:1655–1664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander A, Steel D, Hoekzema K, Mesnick SL, Engelhaupt D, Kerr I et al. (2016) What influences the worldwide genetic structure of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus)?. Mol Ecol 25:2754–2772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander A, Steel D, Slikas B, Hoekzema K, Carraher C, Parks M et al. (2013) Low Diversity in the mitogenome of sperm whales revealed by next-generation sequencing. Genome Biol Evol 5:113–129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Amos B, Schlötterer C, Tautz D (1993) Social structure of pilot whales revealed by analytical DNA profiling. Science 260:670–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ansmann IC, Parra GJ, Lanyon JM, Seddon JM (2012) Fine-scale genetic population structure in a mobile marine mammal: inshore bottlenose dolphins in Moreton Bay, Australia. Mol Ecol 21:4472–4485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CS, Steel D, Calambokidis J, Falcone E, González-Peral U, Barlow J et al. (2013) Strong maternal fidelity and natal philopatry shape genetic structure in North Pacific humpback whales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 494:291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Lennard LG (2000) Population structure and mating patterns of Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) as revealed by DNA analysis. Dissertation, University of British Columbia

  • Bernatchez L, Wellenreuther M, Araneda C, Ashton DT, Barth JMI, Beacham TD et al. (2017) Harnessing the power of genomics to secure the future of seafood. Trends Ecol Evol 32:665–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Best PB (1979) Social organization in sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus. In: Winn HE, Olla BL (eds) Behavior of marine animals. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 227–289

  • Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q Rev Biol 74:21–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buffalo V (2021) Quantifying the relationship between genetic diversity and population size suggests natural selection cannot explain Lewontin’s paradox. eLife 10: e67509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1998) Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. Mol Biol Evol 15:538–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J (2018) fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cros A, Toonen RJ, Donahue MJ, Karl SA (2017) Connecting Palau’s marine protected areas: a population genetic approach to conservation. Coral Reefs 36:735–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Villagrán H, Blanco-Jarvio A, Silva-Segundo CA, Ramos-Rodríguez JA, Flores-Ramírez S, Galván-Tirado C et al. (2024) Mitochondrial DNA diversity of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Gulf of California under a changing environment. Reg Stud Mar Sci 73:103504

    Google Scholar 

  • Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA et al. (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27:2156–2158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Day J, Clark JA, Williamson JE, Brown C, Gillings M (2019) Population genetic analyses reveal female reproductive philopatry in the oviparous Port Jackson shark. Mar Freshw Res 70:986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR (2014) NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour 14:209–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Dufour A-B (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durante CA, Loizaga R, McCracken GR, Crespo EA, Ruzzante DE (2022) Commerson’s dolphin population structure: evidence for female phylopatry and male dispersal. Sci Rep 12: 22219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eguiguren A, Konrad Clarke CM, Cantor M (2023) Sperm whale reproductive strategies: current knowledge and future directions. In: Würsig B, Orbach DN (eds) Sex in Cetaceans: Morphology, Behavior, and the Evolution of Sexual Strategies. Springer International Publishing: Cham, pp 443–467

  • Engelhaupt D, Rus Hoelzel A, Nicholson C, Frantzis A, Mesnick S, Gero S et al. (2009) Female philopatry in coastal basins and male dispersion across the North Atlantic in a highly mobile marine species, the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). Mol Ecol 18:4193–4205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estabrook B, Ponirakis D, Clark C, Rice A (2016) Widespread spatial and temporal extent of anthropogenic noise across the northeastern Gulf of Mexico shelf ecosystem. Endanger Species Res 30:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan G, Zhang Y, Liu X, Wang J, Sun Z, Sun S et al. (2019) The first chromosome-level genome for a marine mammal as a resource to study ecology and evolution. Mol Ecol Resour 19:944–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer NA, Baker K, Zeddies DG, Denes SL, Noren DP, Garrison LP et al. (2018) Population consequences of disturbance by offshore oil and gas activity for endangered sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). Biol Conserv 227:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote AD, Vijay N, Ávila-Arcos MC, Baird RW, Durban JW, Fumagalli M et al. (2016) Genome-culture coevolution promotes rapid divergence of killer whale ecotypes. Nat Commun 7: 11693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ford MJ, Hanson MB, Hempelmann JA, Ayres KL, Emmons CK, Schorr GS et al. (2011) Inferred paternity and male reproductive success in a killer whale (Orcinus orca) Population. J Hered 102:537–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forester BR, Lama TM (2023) The role of genomics in the future of Endangered Species Act decision-making. Codex Endanger Species Act 2:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Bradshaw CJA, Brook BW (2014) Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol Conserv 170:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin I (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Conservation biology - an evolutionary-ecological perspective. 135–149 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA)

  • Gallego-García N, Caballero S, Shaffer HB (2021) Are genomic updates of well-studied species worth the investment for conservation? A case study of the critically endangered Magdalena River Turtle. J Hered 112:575–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison E, Marth G (2012) Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. preprint arXiv:1207.3907, https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907

  • Gero S, Milligan M, Rinaldi C, Francis P, Gordon J, Carlson C et al. (2014) Behavior and social structure of the sperm whales of Dominica, West Indies. Mar Mammal Sci 30:905–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardet J, Sarano F, Richard G, Tixier P, Guinet C, Alexander A et al. (2022) Long distance runners in the marine realm: New insights into genetic diversity, kin relationships and social fidelity of Indian Ocean male sperm whales. Front Mar Sci 9:815684

  • Goudet J (2005) HEIRFSTAT, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F -statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosberg R, Cunningham CW (2001) Genetic structure in the sea. Marine community ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 61–84

  • Guichoux E, Lagache L, Wagner S, Chaumeil P, Léger P, Lepais O et al. (2011) Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Mol Ecol Resour 11:591–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanghøj K, Moltke I, Andersen PA, Manica A, Korneliussen TS (2019) Fast and accurate relatedness estimation from high-throughput sequencing data in the presence of inbreeding. GigaScience 8: giz034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes SA, Josephson E, Maze-Foley K, Rosel PE, McCordic J, Brossard A et al. (2024) U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments 2023. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-321, Woods Hole, MA

  • Hemstrom W, Jones M (2023) snpR: User friendly population genomics for SNP data sets with categorical metadata. Mol Ecol Resour 23:962–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodel RGJ, Segovia-Salcedo MC, Landis JB, Crowl AA, Sun M, Liu X et al. (2016) The report of my death was an exaggeration: a review for researchers using microsatellites in the 21st Century. Appl Plant Sci 4:1600025

  • Jacquard A (1972) Genetic information given by a relative. Biometrics 28:1101–1114

  • Jacquard A (1974) The genetic structure of populations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Jeffries DL, Copp GH, Lawson Handley L, Olsén KH, Sayer CD, Hänfling B (2016) Comparing RADseq and microsatellites to infer complex phylogeographic patterns, an empirical perspective in the Crucian carp, Carassius carassius, L. Mol Ecol 25:2997–3018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jochens AD, Benoit-Bird K, Engelhaupt, D, Gordon J, Hu C, Jaquet N et al. (2008) Sperm whale seismic study in the Gulf of Mexico: Synthesis report. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region: New Orleans, LA

  • Jombart T (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ (2014) Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2:e281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly RP, Palumbi SR (2010) Genetic structure among 50 species of the Northeastern Pacific rocky intertidal community. PLoS ONE 5:e8594

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Pääbo S, Villablanca FX et al. (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6196–6200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CM, Frasier TR, Whitehead H, Gero S (2019) Kin selection and allocare in sperm whales. Behav Ecol 30:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CM, Gero S, Frasier T, Whitehead H (2018) Kinship influences sperm whale social organization within, but generally not among, social units. R Soc Open Sci 5:180914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Korunes KL, Samuk K (2021) pixy: unbiased estimation of nucleotide diversity and divergence in the presence of missing data. Mol Ecol Resour 21:1359–1368

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lah L, Trense D, Benke H, Berggren P, Gunnlaugsson Þ, Lockyer C et al. (2016) Spatially explicit analysis of genome-wide SNPs detects subtle population structure in a mobile marine mammal, the harbor porpoise. PLoS ONE 11: e0162792

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1995) Mutation and Conservation. Conserv Biol 9:782–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh JW, Bryant D, Nakagawa S (2015) POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1110–1116

  • Lemopoulos A, Prokkola JM, Uusi-Heikkilä S, Vasemägi A, Huusko A, Hyvärinen P et al. (2019) Comparing RADseq and microsatellites for estimating genetic diversity and relatedness — Implications for brown trout conservation. Ecol Evol 9:2106–2120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lizewski K, Alexander A, Steel D, Mate B, Engelhaupt D, Wise J et al. (2025) Change in matrilineal structure over time in an isolated population of sperm whales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 758:161–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyrholm T, Leimar O, Johanneson B, Gyllensten U (1999) Sex-biased dispersal in sperm whales: contrasting mitochondrial and nuclear genetic structure of global populations. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 266:347–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M, Chen W-M (2010) Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26:2867–2873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCartney-Melstad E, Vu JK, Shaffer HB (2018) Genomic data recover previously undetectable fragmentation effects in an endangered amphibian. Mol Ecol 27:4430–4443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney GJ, Waples RK, Seeb LW, Seeb JE (2017) Paralogs are revealed by proportion of heterozygotes and deviations in read ratios in genotyping-by-sequencing data from natural populations. Mol Ecol Resour 17:656–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesnick SL, Taylor BL, Archer FI, Martien KK, Treviño SE, Hancock-Hanser BL et al. (2011a) Sperm whale population structure in the eastern and central North Pacific inferred by the use of single-nucleotide polymorphisms, microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 11:278–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesnick SL, Taylor BL, Archer FI, Martien KK, Treviño SE, Hancock-Hanser BL et al. (2011b) Sperm whale population structure in the eastern and central North Pacific inferred by the use of single-nucleotide polymorphisms, microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 11:278–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mijangos JL, Gruber B, Berry O, Pacioni C, Georges A (2022) dartR v2: An accessible genetic analysis platform for conservation, ecology and agriculture. Methods Ecol Evol 13:2150–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller LM, Beheregaray LB (2004) Genetic evidence for sex-biased dispersal in resident bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Mol Ecol 13:1607–1612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montana L, Bringloe TT, Bourret A, Sauvé C, Mosnier A, Ferguson SH et al. (2024) Reduced representation and whole-genome sequencing approaches highlight beluga whale populations associated to eastern Canada summer aggregations. Evol Appl 17: e70058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morin PA, Foote AD, Baker CS, Hancock-Hanser BL, Kaschner K, Mate BR et al. (2018) Demography or selection on linked cultural traits or genes? Investigating the driver of low mtDNA diversity in the sperm whale using complementary mitochondrial and nuclear genome analyses. Mol Ecol 27:2604–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nazareno AG, Bemmels JB, Dick CW, Lohmann LG (2017) Minimum sample sizes for population genomics: an empirical study from an Amazonian plant species. Mol Ecol Resour 17:1136–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Corry-Crowe G, Suydam R, Quakenbush L, Potgieter B, Harwood L, Litovka D et al. (2018) Migratory culture, population structure and stock identity in North Pacific beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). PLoS ONE 13:e0194201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Ortiz JG, Engelhaupt D, Winsor M, Mate BR, Rus Hoelzel A (2012) Kinship of long-term associates in the highly social sperm whale. Mol Ecol 21:732–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR (2003) Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pante E, Simon-Bouhet B (2013) marmap: A Package for importing, plotting and analyzing bathymetric and topographic data in R. PLOS ONE 8: e73051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis E (2010) pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated–modular approach. Bioinformatics 26:419–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petit-Marty N, Vázquez-Luis M, Hendriks IE (2021) Use of the nucleotide diversity in COI mitochondrial gene as an early diagnostic of conservation status of animal species. Conserv Lett 14:e12756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilot M, Dahlheim ME, Hoelzel AR (2010) Social cohesion among kin, gene flow without dispersal and the evolution of population genetic structure in the killer whale (Orcinus orca). J Evol Biol 23:20–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinela AM, Quérouil S, Magalhães S, Silva MA, Prieto R, Matos JA et al. (2009) Population genetics and social organization of the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Azores inferred by microsatellite analyses. Can J Zool 87:802–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poelstra JW, Montero BK, Lüdemann J, Yang Z, Rakotondranary SJ, Hohenlohe P et al. (2022) RADseq data reveal a lack of admixture in a mouse lemur contact zone contrary to previous microsatellite results. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 289:20220596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2024) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R foundation for statistical computing, https://www.R-project.org/ (Vienna, Austria)

  • Rambaut A (2002) Se-Al v.2.0a11. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/

  • Rendell LE, Whitehead H (2003) Vocal clans in sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:225–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richard KR, Dillon MC, Whitehead H, Wright JM (1996) Patterns of kinship in groups of free-living sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) revealed by multiple molecular genetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:8792–8795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM (2005) Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 54:507–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochette NC, Rivera-Colón AG, Catchen JM (2019) Stacks 2: analytical methods for paired-end sequencing improve RADseq-based population genomics. Mol Ecol 28:4737–4754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosel PE (2003) PCR-based sex determination in Odontocete cetaceans. Conserv Genet 4:647–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosel PE, Hansen L, Hohn AA (2009) Restricted dispersal in a continuously distributed marine species: common bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in coastal waters of the western North Atlantic. Mol Ecol 18:5030–5045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russello MA, Waterhouse MD, Etter PD, Johnson EA (2015) From promise to practice: pairing non-invasive sampling with genomics in conservation. PeerJ 3:e1106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford E, Kelly MW (2011) Local adaptation in marine invertebrates. Annu Rev Mar Sci 3:509–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago E, Caballero A, Köpke C, Novo I (2024) Estimation of the contemporary effective population size from SNP data while accounting for mating structure. Mol Ecol Resour 24:e13890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarano F, Girardet J, Sarano V, Vitry H, Preud’homme A, Heuzey R et al. (2021) Kin relationships in cultural species of the marine realm: case study of a matrilineal social group of sperm whales off Mauritius island, Indian Ocean. R Soc Open Sci 8:201794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sellas AB, Wells RS, Rosel PE (2005) Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses reveal fine scale geographic structure in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Gulf of Mexico. Conserv Genet 6:715–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair C, Sinclair J, Zolman E, Martinez A, Balmer B, Barry K (2015) Remote biopsy sampling field procedures for cetaceans used during the natural resource damage assessment of the MSC252 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. NOAA technical memorandum, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula, MS

  • Solsona-Berga A, Frasier K, Posdaljian N, Baumann-Pickering S, Wiggins S, Soldevilla M et al. (2024) Accounting for sperm whale population demographics in density estimation using passive acoustic monitoring. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 746:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speakman TR, Wilcox LA, Balmer BC, Barry KP, Paterson C, Quigley BM et al. (2022) Fine-scale social and genetic structure of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Barataria Basin, Louisiana, USA. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 32:1437–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thia JA (2023) Guidelines for standardizing the application of discriminant analysis of principal components to genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour 23:523–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasimuddin MD, Misra S, Li H, Aluru S (2019) Efficient Architecture-Aware Acceleration of BWA-MEM for MulticoreSystems. IEEE Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00041

  • Violi B, de, Jong MJ, Frantzis A, Alexiadou P, Tardy C, Ody D et al. (2023) Genomics reveals the role of admixture in the evolution of structure among sperm whale populations within the Mediterranean Sea. Mol Ecol 32:2715–2731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer NL, Rosel PE, Mullin KD, Schwacke LH, Garrison LP, Balmer BC et al. (2021) Assessing common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) population structure in Mississippi Sound and coastal waters of the north central Gulf of Mexico. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 31:2951–2966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer NL, Viricel A, Wilcox L, Katherine Moore M, Rosel PE (2011) The occurrence of mtDNA heteroplasmy in multiple cetacean species. Curr Genet 57:115–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RK, Albrechtsen A, Moltke I (2019) Allele frequency-free inference of close familial relationships from genotypes or low-depth sequencing data. Mol Ecol 28:35–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS, Anderson EC (2017) Purging putative siblings from population genetic data sets: a cautionary view. Mol Ecol 26:1211–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

  • Whitehead H (1993) The behaviour of mature male sperm whales on the Galápagos Islands breeding grounds. Can J Zool 71:689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (1998) Cultural selection and genetic diversity in matrilineal whales. Science 282:1708–1711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (2018) Sperm whale. In: Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, p 919–925

  • Whitehead H, Shin M (2022) Current global population size, post-whaling trend and historical trajectory of sperm whales. Sci Rep 12:19468

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H, Barlow J, Dawson SM, Eguiguren A, Miller B Shabangu F (2025) Physeter macrocephalus. The IUCN RedList of Threatened Species 2025:e.T41755A50382216. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2025-2.RLTS.T41755A50382216.en. Accessed on 03 February 2026

  • Zimmerman SJ, Aldridge CL, Oyler-McCance SJ (2020) An empirical comparison of population genetic analyses using microsatellite and SNP data for a species of conservation concern. BMC Genomics 21:382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nicole Phillips for assistance with processing samples in the laboratory and Laura Dias, Jesse Wicker, and Wayne Hoggard for contributing to sample collection. Funding for sample collection was provided by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management IA M09PG00014 and M11PG00041. This work made use of the Sedna high-performance computing cluster hosted at and administered within NOAA Fisheries, which has been funded by NOAA Fisheries' advanced technologies strategic initiatives. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NOAA or the Department of Commerce.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RSB conducted the analysis, made figures, and wrote the manuscript. LAWT conducted lab work and analyzed the mitochondrial data, while LAWT, NLV, and PER conceptualized the project and helped to interpret results. AM, LPG, and DE collected samples. All authors helped to revise the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reid S. Brennan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Research ethics statement

This research was carried out, in part, under the auspices of the Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS), a Cooperative Institute of the University of Miami and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, cooperative agreement #NA20OAR4320472. Biopsy sampling was conducted under NMFS MMPA permits 738, 779-1339, 779-1633, and 14450.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Associate editor: Bastiaan Star.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brennan, R.S., Wilcox Talbot, L.A., Martinez, A. et al. Mitochondrial structure despite nuclear panmixia: sex-specific dispersal dictates population structure in sperm whales. Heredity (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-026-00824-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-026-00824-x

Search

Quick links