Table 5 Synteny comparison between diploid Rosa and Fragaria vesca

From: Genotyping-by-sequencing application on diploid rose and a resulting high-density SNP-based consensus map

LGs

Populations

Fragaria vesca

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Diploid Rosa

 1

J14-3×LC

2

4

4

4

8

0

164

J14-3×VS

0

3

1

6

5

0

144

OB×RF

0

3

1

1

2

1

91

ICD

2

8

5

9

10

1

309

 2

J14-3×LC

136

0

0

0

0

134

0

J14-3×VS

160

0

0

0

0

136

0

OB×RF

197

0

0

0

0

170

0

ICD

380

0

0

0

0

371

0

 3

J14-3×LC

14

0

3

4

1

172

0

J14-3×VS

11

1

4

0

0

104

1

OB×RF

8

1

4

2

1

64

0

ICD

27

2

8

5

1

292

1

 4

J14-3×LC

1

9

9

173

2

4

0

J14-3×VS

4

3

7

205

1

3

0

OB×RF

6

7

7

198

0

2

0

ICD

11

15

19

465

3

6

0

 5

J14-3×LC

1

6

235

16

4

2

9

J14-3×VS

2

3

190

16

2

3

8

OB×RF

3

5

258

11

9

6

10

ICD

4

10

484

26

15

8

15

 6

J14-3×LC

1

210

4

2

1

0

1

J14-3×VS

1

134

1

1

0

1

1

OB×RF

0

215

4

1

1

1

2

ICD

1

451

8

4

2

2

3

 7

J14-3×LC

4

5

1

18

194

2

3

J14-3×VS

3

6

4

21

222

1

2

OB×RF

1

5

8

16

210

1

0

ICD

7

11

12

25

460

4

5

  1. The number of markers from each diploid rose linkage group and the consensus map that corresponded to the Fragaria v2.0a1 pseudomolecule assembly is shown. Groups of markers strongly indicating the syntenic linkage groups between Rosa and Fragaria are shown in bold.
Back to article page