Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of study population of women with previous singleton pregnancy complicated by early-onset (EO) or late-onset (LO) pre-eclampsia (PE) and controls, obtained retrospectively

From: Inappropriate left ventricular mass after preeclampsia: another piece of the puzzle Inappropriate LVM and PE

Variable

EO-PE group (n = 30)

LO-PE group (n = 30)

Controls (n = 30)

P

LVEF (%)

56 ± 7*

61 ± 5

63 ± 4

 < 0.001

Stroke volume (mL)a

46 ± 11

50 ± 15

48 ± 18

0.669

LVM (g)

109.9 ± 29.4

108.1 ± 17.1

97.9 ± 17.5

0.081

LVMi (g/m2)

64.7 ± 13.6

64.7 ± 8.2

61.2 ± 10.8

0.389

RWT

0.42 ± 0.09*

0.44 ± 0.11

0.36 ± 0.06

0.238

Concentric remodelling

18 (60.0%)*

16 (53.3%)

0 (0.0%)

 < 0.001

E/A ratio

1.24 ± 0.19

1.27 ± 0.25

1.18 ± 0.09

0.212

E wave deceleration time (ms)

208 ± 70

185 ± 42

185 ± 13

0.136

E/E’

7.20 ± 1.34

7.37 ± 0.63

6.78 ± 1.13

0.091

Grade I diastolic dysfunction

3 (10.0%)*

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.045

pLVM (g)a

96.7 ± 12.6

97.7 ± 16.2

95.1 ± 19.2

0.820

LVM/pLVM (%)a

123 ± 36*

112 ± 15

104 ± 16

0.020

Inappropriate LVMa

12 (52.2%)*

5 (16.7%)

0 (0.0%)

0.002

MEE (mL/s)a

35.2 ± 10.2

39.4 ± 13.6

36.7 ± 14.4

0.502

MEEi (mL/s/g)a

0.41 ± 0.27

0.47 ± 0.14

0.48 ± 0.12

0.498

  1. Data are given as mean ± SD, n (%)
  2. LV left ventricular, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVM left ventricular mass, LVMi left ventricular mass index, MEE mechano-energetic efficiency, MEEi mechano-energetic efficiency index, pLVM predicted left ventricular mass, RWT relative wall thickness
  3. Post-hoc two-sample comparison of groups: *P < 0.05, EO-PE vs. controls, †P < 0.05, LO-PE vs. controls, ‡P < 0.05, EO-PE vs. LO-PE
  4. aData available only in 23/30 (76.7%) EO-PE