Table 2 Cost savings associated with implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the base case and sensitivity scenario analyses
Scenario | Hospitalization rate without sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, % | Cost per sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test, JPY | sFlt-1/PlGF ratio retest option | Hospitalization rate with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio result ≤38, % | Hospitalization rate with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio result >38, % | Cost saving per patient, JPY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base case (including NICU admission for RDS) | 14.4 | 9000 | No | 0.56 | 40 | 16,373 |
Hospitalization rate without sFlt-1/PlGF ratio increased to overall rate in PROGNOSIS Asia | 26.9 | 9000 | No | 0.56 | 40 | 69,482 |
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cost per test reduced by 20% | 14.4 | 7200 | No | 0.56 | 40 | 18,173 |
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cost per test increased by 20% | 14.4 | 10,800 | No | 0.56 | 40 | 14,573 |
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio retest considered for every woman | 14.4 | 9000 | Yes | 0.56 | 40 | 7373 |
Hospitalization rate with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≤38 increased to 4% | 14.4 | 9000 | No | 4 | 40 | 6782 |
Hospitalization rate with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≤38 reduced to 0% | 14.4 | 9000 | No | 0 | 40 | 17,934 |
Hospitalization rate with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >38 increased to 50% | 14.4 | 9000 | No | 0.56 | 50 | 9157 |