Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • JSH2025 Systematic Review Series: Clinical Questions in the Management of Hypertension
  • Published:

Effectiveness of self-monitoring devices measuring the urinary sodium–to–potassium ratio, urinary salt (sodium) excretion, or salt concentration in foods for blood pressure management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Self-monitoring devices that measure the urinary sodium-to-potassium (Na/K) ratio, urinary salt or sodium excretion, or salt concentration in foods have emerged as tools that can guide dietary adjustments for blood pressure (BP) control. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether these self-monitoring devices can help to control BP in adults. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the effect of these devices (with or without additional dietary education) plus usual care on BP with that of usual care alone. The pooled effect of weighted mean difference between the intervention and control groups at the end of follow-up was estimated by random-effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the change in BP. Secondary outcomes included changes in the urinary Na/K ratio, and sodium and potassium excretions. Of 1525 studies screened, eight (with 1442 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed greater reductions in systolic BP by 2.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.04, 4.86) mmHg and diastolic BP by 1.38 (−0.15, 2.90) mmHg in the intervention vs. control groups. However, heterogeneity was high (I² = 69.4% for systolic BP and 65.1% for diastolic BP). The BP-lowering effect was not statistically different across different follow-up durations (4 weeks or 2–6 months) and intervention approaches (self-monitoring alone or combined with dietary education) (all p values for heterogeneity >0.1). Reductions in the urinary Na/K ratio and sodium excretion were greater in the intervention group. Self-monitoring devices may assist with BP reduction by promoting decreased sodium intake and increased potassium intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinberger MH. Sodium, potassium, and blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:46S–8S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 h urinary sodium and potassium excretion. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. BMJ. 1988;297:319–28.

  3. Jackson SL, Cogswell ME, Zhao L, Terry AL, Wang CY, Wright J, et al. Association between urinary sodium and potassium excretion and blood pressure among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2014. Circulation. 2018;137:237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hisamatsu T, Lloyd-Jones DM, Colangelo LA, Liu K. Urinary sodium and potassium excretions in young adulthood and blood pressure by middle age: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. J Hypertens. 2021;39:1586–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:3–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aburto NJ, Hanson S, Gutierrez H, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP. Effect of increased potassium intake on cardiovascular risk factors and disease: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ. 2013;346:f1378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. He FJ, Li J, Macgregor GA. Effect of longer-term modest salt reduction on blood pressure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD004937.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hisamatsu T, Kogure M, Tabara Y, Hozawa A, Sakima A, Tsuchihashi T, et al. Practical use and target value of urine sodium-to-potassium ratio in assessment of hypertension risk for Japanese: consensus statement by the Japanese Society of Hypertension Working Group on urine sodium-to-potassium ratio. Hypertens Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01861-x.

  9. Tabara Y, Takahashi Y, Kumagai K, Setoh K, Kawaguchi T, Takahashi M, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of spot urine sodium-to-potassium ratio clarified close relationship with blood pressure level: the Nagahama study. J Hypertens. 2015;33:2407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thi Minh Nguyen T, Miura K, Tanaka-Mizuno S, Tanaka T, Nakamura Y, Fujiyoshi A, et al. Association of blood pressure with estimates of 24-h urinary sodium and potassium excretion from repeated single-spot urine samples. Hypertens Res. 2019;42:411–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shahaj O, Denneny D, Schwappach A, Pearce G, Epiphaniou E, Parke HL, et al. Supporting self-management for people with hypertension: a meta-review of quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews. J Hypertens. 2019;37:264–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morikawa N, Yamasue K, Tochikubo O, Mizushima S. Effect of salt reduction intervention program using an electronic salt sensor and cellular phone on blood pressure among hypertensive workers. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2011;33:216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meuleman Y, Hoekstra T, Dekker FW, Navis G, Vogt L, van der Boog PJM, et al. Sodium restriction in patients with CKD: a randomized controlled trial of self-management support. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69:576–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takada T, Imamoto M, Sasaki S, Azuma T, Miyashita J, Hayashi M, et al. Effects of self-monitoring of daily salt intake estimated by a simple electrical device for salt reduction: a cluster randomized trial. Hypertens Res. 2018;41:524–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yasutake K, Miyoshi E, Misumi Y, Kajiyama T, Fukuda T, Ishii T, et al. Self-monitoring of urinary salt excretion as a method of salt-reduction education: a parallel, randomized trial involving two groups. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:2164–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Iwahori T, Ueshima H, Ohgami N, Yamashita H, Miyagawa N, Kondo K, et al. Effectiveness of a self-monitoring device for urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio on dietary improvement in free-living adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Epidemiol. 2018;28:41–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yasutake K, Umeki Y, Horita N, Morita R, Murata Y, Ohe K, et al. A self-monitoring urinary salt excretion level measurement device for educating young women about salt reduction: a parallel randomized trial involving two groups. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21:730–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yokokawa H, Yuasa M, Nedsuwan S, Moolphate S, Fukuda H, Kitajima T, et al. An impact of dietary intervention on blood pressures among diabetic and/or hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular disorders risk in northern Thailand by cluster randomized trial. J Gen Fam Med. 2021;22:28–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiriyatanakorn S, Mukdadilok A, Kantachuvesiri S, Mekhora C, Yingchoncharoen T. Impact of self-monitoring of salt intake by salt meter in hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial (SMAL-SALT). J Clin Hypertens. 2021;23:1852–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Japan Council for Quality Health Care. Minds Manual Developing Committee ed. Minds manual for guideline development 2020 ver. 3.0. 2024. https://minds.jcqhc.or.jp/methods/cpg-development/minds-manual/.

  22. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Aliasgharzadeh S, Tabrizi JS, Nikniaz L, Ebrahimi-Mameghani M, Lotfi Yagin N. Effect of salt reduction interventions in lowering blood pressure: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0277929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Turnbull F, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists C. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362:1527–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2985–3023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, Boutouyrie P, Burger D, Chirinos JA, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet. 2016;388:2665–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development under Research and Development of Guidance for Lifelong Blood Pressure Management Using Digital Technology (grant number 22rea522002h0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Hisamatsu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hisamatsu, T., Ueda, K., Arakawa, K. et al. Effectiveness of self-monitoring devices measuring the urinary sodium–to–potassium ratio, urinary salt (sodium) excretion, or salt concentration in foods for blood pressure management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res 48, 1891–1898 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02124-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02124-z

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links