Modern plant biology relies heavily on genetic sequence information from species with a diversity of origins. Could proposed changes to the terms of use of this digital sequence information threaten the development of new crop varieties and improvements in global agriculture?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Data challenges for future plant gene editing: expert opinion
Transgenic Research Open Access 09 June 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
McCouch, S. et al. Nature 499, 23–24 (2014).
Fu, Y. B. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 2131–2142 (2015).
Convention on Biological Diversity (United Nations, 1992); https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/default.shtml
Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising From Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2011); https://www.cbd.int/abs/text/default.shtml
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (FAO, 2009); http://www.fao.org/plant-treaty/overview/texts-treaty/en
Manzella, D. Item 6 of the Provisional Agenda: International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (FAO, 2016); http://www.fao.org/3/a-bq619e.pdf
Kloppenburg, J. R. First The Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology 2nd edn (Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, 2004).
Moore, G. & Tymowski, W. Explanatory Guide to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (IUCN, 2005).
Greiber, T. et al. An Explanatory Guide to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing (IUCN, 2012).
Marden, E. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 64, 1133–1139 (2017).
Hammond, E. Sequence Information: A Pressing Concern for the Seed Treaty (Third World Network, 2017); https://www.twn.my/title2/biotk/2017/btk171006.htm
Hammond, E. TWN Briefings for UN Biodiversity Conference No. 1 (Biosafety Information Centre, 2015); https://www.biosafety-info.net/article.php?aid=1308
Digital Genebankers Plan to Ignore UN Request on the Impact of Genomics and Synthetic Biology on Access and Benefit Sharing (Third World Network, 2016); http://www.twn.my/announcement/digital_genebanks_final_uslet.pdf
The Seed Treaty Undermined by the Gangrene of Biopiracy (La Via Campesina, 2015); https://viacampesina.org/en/the-seed-treaty-undermined-by-the-gangrene-of-biopiracy
Summary of the Seventh Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: 30 October – 3 November 2017 (Earth Negotiations Bulletin, IISD Reporting Services, 2017); http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb09691e.pdf
Resolution 13/2017 Multi-Year Programme of Work of the Governing Body of the International Treaty (FAO, 2017); http://www.fao.org/3/a-mv176e.pdf
Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2016); https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-13/cop-13-dec-16-en.pdf
Submissions from Parties, Other Governments, Relevant Organizations and Stakeholders (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2017); https://www.cbd.int/abs/dsi-gr/ahteg.shtml#submissions
Brazil Law No. 13.123 of May 20, 2015 (Access and Benefits Sharing of Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge, 2015).
Best Process to Handle Genetic Sequence Data from Influenza Viruses With Human Pandemic Potential (IVPP GSD) Under the PIP Framework (World Health Organization, 2015); http://www.who.int/influenza/pip/advisory_group/gsdoptionspaper_revised.pdf?ua=1
Roa, C., Sackville-Hamilton, R., Wenzl, P. & Powell, W. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 633–636 (2016).
DeFrancesco, L. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 794–802 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the support of Genome Canada and Genome British Columbia. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are the author’s alone and not of Sidley Austin LLP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marden, E. International agreements may impact genomic technologies. Nature Plants 4, 2–4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0087-4
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0087-4
This article is cited by
-
Data challenges for future plant gene editing: expert opinion
Transgenic Research (2021)
-
Genebank genomics bridges the gap between the conservation of crop diversity and plant breeding
Nature Genetics (2019)