Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj biofilms and microbiomes
  3. articles
  4. article
A theoretical exploration of protocols for treating prosthetic joint infections with combinations of antibiotics and bacteriophage
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2026

A theoretical exploration of protocols for treating prosthetic joint infections with combinations of antibiotics and bacteriophage

  • Bruce R. Levin1,
  • Teresa Gil-Gil1,
  • Brandon A. Berryhill1,2 &
  • …
  • Michael H. Woodworth3 

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Microbiology

Abstract

With the increase in the placement of prosthetic joints and other hardware in the body, associated infections have risen. These infections are complicated to treat due to the underlying bacteria generating matrices that resist clearance by immune system effectors or antibiotics. These matrices, biofilms, have two primary ways of being eradicated: either by physical removal during surgery or by killing the underlying bacteria, usually with antibiotics. The viruses that kill bacteria, bacteriophages, are readily capable of entering biofilms and eradicating the bacteria therein. Therefore, bacteriophages have therapeutic potential as a supplement to antibiotics for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections. In this investigation, we generate a mathematical and computer-simulation model to explore the contributions of the innate immune system with antibiotics, bacteriophage, and the joint action to control biofilm-associated infections. Our results question the proposition that bacteriophages are an effective addition in the treatment of prosthetic joint infections.

Data availability

The Berkeley Madonna programs used for these simulations are available at EcLF.net. All data are presented in this article or its supplementary materials.

References

  1. Nelson, S. B., Pinkney, J. A., Chen, A. F. & Tande, A. J. Periprosthetic joint infection: current clinical challenges. Clin. Infect. Dis. 77, e34–e45 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Osmon, D. R. et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 56, e1–e25 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Strathdee, S. A., Hatfull, G. F., Mutalik, V. K. & Schooley, R. T. Phage therapy: from biological mechanisms to future directions. Cell 186, 17–31 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duarte, A. C. et al. Synergistic removal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by using a combination of phage Kayvirus rodi with the exopolysaccharide depolymerase Dpo7. Front. Microbiol. 15, 1438022 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chegini, Z. et al. Bacteriophage therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: a review. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 19, 45 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dickey, J. & Perrot, V. Adjunct phage treatment enhances the effectiveness of low antibiotic concentration against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro. PLoS ONE 14, e0209390 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, Z., Yuan, M. & Chai, J. Mini review advantages and limitations of lytic phages compared with chemical antibiotics to combat bacterial infections. Heliyon 10, e34849 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Talapko, J. & Škrlec, I. The principles, mechanisms, and benefits of unconventional agents in the treatment of biofilm infection. Pharmaceuticals https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13100299 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, J. W. et al. Antibacterial immunonegative coating with biocompatible materials on a nanostructured titanium plate for orthopedic bone fracture surgery. Biomater. Res. 28, 0070 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, A. L., De Soir, S. & Jones, J. D. The safety and efficacy of phage therapy for bone and joint infections: a systematic review. Antibiotics https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110795 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suh, G. A. et al. Considerations for the use of phage therapy in clinical practice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 66, e0207121 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Le Pogam, A. et al. Proportion of patients with prosthetic joint infection eligible for adjuvant phage therapy: a French single-centre retrospective study. BMC Infect. Dis. 24, 923 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Young, J., Mehta, N., Lee, S. W. & Rodriguez, E. K. How effective is phage therapy for prosthetic joint infections? A preliminary systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of early outcomes. Medicina https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050790 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levin, B. R., Stewart, F. M. & Chao, L. Resource-limited growth, competition, and predation: a model and experimental studies with bacteria and bacteriophage. Am. Nat. 977, 3–24 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berryhill, B. A., Huseby, D. L., McCall, I. C., Hughes, D. & Levin, B. R. Evaluating the potential efficacy and limitations of a phage for joint antibiotic and phage therapy of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2008007118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levin, B. R., Baquero, F., Ankomah, P. P. & McCall, I. C. Phagocytes, antibiotics, and self-limiting bacterial infections. Trends Microbiol. 25, 878–892 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quispe-Villegas, G. et al. In vivo evaluation of phage therapy against Klebsiella pneumoniae using the Galleria mellonella model and molecular characterization of a novel Drulisvirus phage species. Microbiol. Spectr. 13, e01145–01124 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tan, Q., Ye, J., Zhu, T. & Tian, Y. Isolation and characterization of a novel bacteriophage PUTH1 active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Virol. J. 22, 248 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wangersky, P. J. Lotka-Volterra population models. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9, 189–218 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sendi, P., Banderet, F., Graber, P. & Zimmerli, W. Periprosthetic joint infection following Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J. Infect. 63, 17–22 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tornero, E. et al. Prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Int. J. Artif. Organs 35, 884–892 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gbejuade, H. O., Lovering, A. M. & Webb, J. C. The role of microbial biofilms in prosthetic joint infections: a review. Acta Orthop. 86, 147–158 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Datta, S. Modeling the spread of bacteria through complex environments. https://www.siam.org/publications/siam-news/articles/modeling-the-spread-of-bacteria-through-complex-environments/.

  24. Örmälä, A.-M. & Jalasvuori, M. Phage therapy: should bacterial resistance to phages be a concern, even in the long run? Bacteriophage 3, e24219 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. McBain, A. J. In vitro biofilm models: an overview. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 69, 99–132 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Coenye, T. & Nelis, H. J. In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formation. J. Microbiol. Methods 83, 89–105 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marcoline, F. V., Furth, J., Nayak, S., Grabe, M. & Macey, R. I. Berkeley Madonna Version 10—a simulation package for solving mathematical models. CPT Pharmacomet. Syst. Pharmacol. 11, 290–301 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the other members of the Levin Lab for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. BRL would like to thank the U.S. National Institute of General Medical Sciences for their funding support via R35GM136407 and the Emory University Antibiotic Resistance Center. The funding sources had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analysis, interpretation of the data, or drafting of this report. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Bruce R. Levin, Teresa Gil-Gil & Brandon A. Berryhill

  2. Program in Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Graduate Division of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Laney Graduate School, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Brandon A. Berryhill

  3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Michael H. Woodworth

Authors
  1. Bruce R. Levin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teresa Gil-Gil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brandon A. Berryhill
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael H. Woodworth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B., M.H.W. Methodology: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B. Investigation: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B. Visualization: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B. Funding acquisition: B.R.L. Project administration: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B., M.H.W. Supervision: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B., M.H.W. Writing—initial draft: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B., M.H.W. Writing—review & editing: B.R.L., T.G.G., B.A.B., M.H.W.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce R. Levin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levin, B.R., Gil-Gil, T., Berryhill, B.A. et al. A theoretical exploration of protocols for treating prosthetic joint infections with combinations of antibiotics and bacteriophage. npj Biofilms Microbiomes (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-025-00908-2

Download citation

  • Received: 27 June 2025

  • Accepted: 30 December 2025

  • Published: 14 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-025-00908-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Biofilms and implants: new approaches and challenges

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes (npj Biofilms Microbiomes)

ISSN 2055-5008 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology