Table 3 Summary of clinical studies analyzing ctDNA for MRD monitoring (ctDNA was analyzed retrospectively in those studies)

From: Use of ctDNA in early breast cancer: analytical validity and clinical potential

Reference (author and year)

Number of patients (N) and inclusion

Frequency of ctDNA analysis

Technique for ctDNA analysis

Median follow-up

Performance of ctDNA MRD monitoring

Shaw et al.57

N = 156

Completion of curative treatment in the previous 3 years and high risk of relapse (≥ 65% at 10 years)

Every 6 months for a total of 12 years

Tumor-informed

SignateraTM

Not reported

Detect recurrence

• Specificity 95%

• Sensitivity 88%

The median lead time of ctDNA-positivity before clinical relapse

• 10.5 months

Association with ctDNA-positivity

• HR for RFS 47.5

• HR for OS 84.15

Lipsyc-Sharf et al.58

N = 83

High-risk HR + HER2- more than 5 years after curative treatment

Every 6 to 12 months

Tumor-informed

RaDaRTM

2.0 years from the first sample

Detect recurrence

• Sensitivity 85.7%

• Specificity 97.4%

The median lead time of ctDNA-positivity before clinical relapse

• 12.4 months

La Rocca,115

N = 33

TNBC Stage II and more

Every 6 months (less than 50% of patients were followed)

Tumor-informed

ddPCR

5.1 years

Detect recurrence

• Sensitivity 75% for distant disease in patients tested according to protocol

• Specificity not reported

Garcia-Murillas et al.116

N = 144

All subtypes receiving NAT

Every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for a total of 5 years

Tumor-informed

ddPCR

36.3 months

Detect recurrence

• Sensitivity 79%

• Specificity not reported

The median lead time of ctDNA-positivity before clinical relapse

10.7 months

Association with ctDNA-positivity

• HR for RFS 17.4

Janni et al.93

N = 38

No information on subtypes

At 12 or 36 months post-diagnosis and/or at clinical relapse

Tumor-agnostic

GuardantRevealTM

Not reported

Detect recurrence

• Sensitivity 85% of distant and 15% of local relapses

• Specificity 100%

Janni et al.94

N = 311

All subtypes

One timepoint at two years after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy

Tumor-agnostic

GuardantRevealTM

65 months

Detect recurrence

• Sensitivity 34%

• Specificity 97.7%

The median lead time of ctDNA-positivity before clinical relapse

• 7.9 months

Association with ctDNA-positivity

• HR for RFS 11

Elliott et al.95

N = 83

HER2- BC

Post-operative and every 3–6 months during follow-up

Tumor-agnostic

Methylation analysis from GuardantINFINITYTM

3.7 years

ctDNA detected post-operative and/or during follow-up

P = 0.00021 for association with clinical recurrence

Loi et al.92

N = 178

High-risk luminal BC

At trial entry and at 24 months

Tumor-informed

SignateraTM

Unknown

10/178 (5.6%) patients tested positive at baseline

• 3 cleared ctDNA at 24 months: no relapse

• 7 did not clear ctDNA at 24 months: all relapsed

At 24 months 42/178 (23.6%) tested positive: all relapsed

• Sensitivity for relapse 60%

• Specificity for relapse 100%

  1. BC breast cancer, CI confidence interval, ctDNA circulating tumor DNA, ddPCR digital drop polymerase chain reaction, EFS event-free survival, ER estrogen receptor-positive, FU follow-up, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HR hazard ratio, HR+ hormone receptor-positive, HR− hormone receptor-negative, N number of patients, NAT neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NGS next-generation sequencing, OS overall survival, P P value, RD residual disease, RFS relapse-free survival, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, VAF variant allele frequency, WES whole-exome sequencing.