Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Breast Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj breast cancer
  3. articles
  4. article
A multi-ancestry genome-wide study of tamoxifen metabolism and breast cancer recurrence
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 March 2026

A multi-ancestry genome-wide study of tamoxifen metabolism and breast cancer recurrence

  • Chiea Chuen Khor1,2,3,
  • Whee Sze Ong4,
  • Elaine Hsuen Lim5,
  • Etienne Chatelut6,7,
  • Sylvia Chen8,
  • Thomas E. Muerdter9,10,
  • Jean E. Abraham11,12,13,
  • Natalia Sutiman8,
  • Joanne Siok Liu Lim8,
  • Sze Sing Lee8,
  • Cecile Arellano6,
  • Zheng Li1,
  • Kar Seng Sim1,
  • Diana M. Eccles14,15,
  • William J. Tapper14,15,
  • Tom Maishman14,15,
  • Nathalie K. Zgheib16,
  • Stefan Winter9,10,
  • Boian Ganchev9,10,
  • Leila Dorling17,
  • Qi Guo18,
  • Carlos Caldas11,13,19,
  • Helena M. Earl11,12,13,
  • Louise Hiller20,
  • Janet Dunn20,
  • Raymond Chee Hui Ng5,
  • Yoon Sim Yap5,
  • Mabel Wong5,
  • Fuh Yong Wong21,
  • Nan Soon Wong22,
  • Peter Cher Siang Ang22,
  • Rebecca Dent5,
  • Peter Krippl23,
  • Uwe Langsenlehner24,
  • Tanja Langsenlehner24,
  • Arafat Tfayli25,
  • Elke Schaeffeler9,10,
  • Michel Eichelbaum9,10,
  • Ute Hamann26,
  • Peter A. Fasching27,
  • Matthias W. Beckmann28,
  • Florence Dalenc6,7,
  • Melanie White-Koning6,
  • Hiltrud B. Brauch9,29,30,
  • Werner Schroth9,10,
  • Wilfried Renner31,
  • Matthias Schwab9,29,30,32,
  • Fabienne Thomas6,7 &
  • …
  • Balram Chowbay8,33 

npj Breast Cancer , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1346 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Cancer
  • Drug discovery
  • Genetics
  • Oncology

Abstract

Tamoxifen’s pharmacokinetics are strongly influenced by the highly polymorphic CYP2D6, while the influence of other genetic variants has been inconclusive. To further delineate this genotypic-phenotypic impact, we conducted a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study in 636 hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with 20 mg tamoxifen daily for ≥8 weeks and validated these genetic determinants in another 869 patients. Association with clinical outcomes was examined in 1326 non-metastatic HR+ patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. A genome-wide significant association with Z-endoxifen levels was observed at the CYP2D6 locus on chromosome 22 and its downstream region of TCF20 rs932376 A > G. Both CYP2D6 metabolizer status and TCF20 rs932376 A > G were independent predictors of endoxifen levels in multivariable analysis. CYP2D6 metabolizer status accounted for greater variability of mean endoxifen levels compared to TCF20 rs932376 A > G (91.2% vs 48.8%). These findings were replicated in validation cohorts. Neither TCF20 rs932376 nor CYP2D6 metabolizer status was significantly associated with BC outcomes after adjustment for known prognostic factors. Our study confirmed that CYP2D6 metabolizer status remains as the prime predictor of steady-state Z-endoxifen levels, while TCF20 rs932376 A > G has a smaller, independent effect. Both genetic factors were not associated with BC clinical outcomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

CYP2C8 rs11572080 and CYP3A4 rs2740574 risk genotypes in paclitaxel-treated premenopausal breast cancer patients

Article Open access 04 April 2024

Reconstructing the pharmacogenomic landscape of psychiatric medication metabolism in the Indian population

Article Open access 05 March 2026

Implementation of CYP2D6 copy-number imputation panel and frequency of key pharmacogenetic variants in Finnish individuals with a psychotic disorder

Article Open access 23 February 2022

Data Availability

Data supporting this study have been de-identified and only known to the respective research teams involved in patient recruitment. The data is not publicly available due to confidentiality of the research participants and is governed by the data sharing policies of the respective research institutions. Please contact the corresponding author (BC) for any request.

References

  1. Lim, J. S. L. et al. Impact of CYP2D6, CYP3A5, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms on tamoxifen pharmacokinetics in Asian breast cancer patients. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 71, 737–750 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lim, J. S. L. et al. Association of CYP2C19*2 and associated haplotypes with lower norendoxifen concentrations in tamoxifen-treated Asian breast cancer patients. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 81, 1142–1152 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sutiman, N. et al. Pharmacogenetics of UGT1A4, UGT2B7 and UGT2B15 and Their Influence on Tamoxifen Disposition in Asian Breast Cancer Patients. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 55, 1239–1250 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lim, Y. C., Desta, Z., Flockhart, D. A. & Skaar, T. C. Endoxifen (4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen) has anti-estrogenic effects in breast cancer cells with potency similar to 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 55, 471–478 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mürdter, T. E. et al. Activity levels of tamoxifen metabolites at the estrogen receptor and the impact of genetic polymorphisms of phase I and II enzymes on their concentration levels in plasma. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 89, 708–717 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Madlensky, L. et al. Tamoxifen metabolite concentrations, CYP2D6 genotype, and breast cancer outcomes. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 89, 718–725 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gong, I. Y. et al. Determination of clinically therapeutic endoxifen concentrations based on efficacy from human MCF7 breast cancer xenografts. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 139, 61–69 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teft, W. A. et al. CYP3A4 and seasonal variation in vitamin D status in addition to CYP2D6 contribute to therapeutic endoxifen level during tamoxifen therapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 139, 95–105 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saladores, P. et al. Tamoxifen metabolism predicts drug concentrations and outcome in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer. Pharmacogenomics J. 15, 84–94 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schroth, W. et al. Improved Prediction of Endoxifen Metabolism by CYP2D6 Genotype in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Tamoxifen. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 582 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goetz, M. P. & Ingle, J. N. CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen: considerations for proper nonprospective studies. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 96, 141–144 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rae, J. M., Regan, M., Leyland-Jones, B., Hayes, D. F. & Dowsett, M. CYP2D6 genotype should not be used for deciding about tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 31, 2753–2755 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brauch, H. & Schwab, M. Prediction of tamoxifen outcome by genetic variation of CYP2D6 in post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 77, 695–703 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sanchez-Spitman, A. B. et al. A Genome-Wide Association Study of Endoxifen Serum Concentrations and Adjuvant Tamoxifen Efficacy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 116, 155–164 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hennig, E. E. et al. Non-CYP2D6 Variants Selected by a GWAS Improve the Prediction of Impaired Tamoxifen Metabolism in Patients with Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 8, 1087 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khor, C. C. et al. Cross-Ancestry Genome-Wide Association Study Defines the Extended CYP2D6 Locus as the Principal Genetic Determinant of Endoxifen Plasma Concentrations. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 113, 712–723 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Binkhorst, L., Mathijssen, R. H. J., Jager, A. & van Gelder, T. Individualization of tamoxifen therapy: much more than just CYP2D6 genotyping. Cancer Treat. Rev. 41, 289–299 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rekdal, C., Sjøttem, E. & Johansen, T. The nuclear factor SPBP contains different functional domains and stimulates the activity of various transcriptional activators. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40288–40300 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sanz, L., Moscat, J. & Diaz-Meco, M. T. Molecular characterization of a novel transcription factor that controls stromelysin expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3164–3170 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lyngsø, C. et al. Interaction between the transcription factor SPBP and the positive cofactor RNF4. An interplay between protein binding zinc fingers. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26144–26149 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elvenes, J. et al. Pax6 represses androgen receptor-mediated transactivation by inhibiting recruitment of the coactivator SPBP. PloS One 6, e24659 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gburcik, V., Bot, N., Maggiolini, M. & Picard, D. SPBP is a phosphoserine-specific repressor of estrogen receptor alpha. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3421–3430 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pan, X., Ning, M. & Jeong, H. Transcriptional Regulation of CYP2D6 Expression. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 45, 42–48 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, X. et al. Systematic genetic and genomic analysis of cytochrome P450 enzyme activities in human liver. Genome Res. 20, 1020–1036 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. MacLehose, R. F., Ahern, T. P., Collin, L. J., Li, A. & Lash, T. L. CYP2D6 Phenotype and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Bias Analysis and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 34, 224–233 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goetz, M. P. et al. First-in-Human Phase I Study of the Tamoxifen Metabolite Z-Endoxifen in Women With Endocrine-Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 35, 3391–3400 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mürdter, T. E. et al. Supplementation of Tamoxifen with low-dose Endoxifen in breast cancer patients with impaired tamoxifen metabolism (TAMENDOX): a randomized controlled phase 1/2 trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 31, 4903–4911 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Awada, Z. et al. Pharmacogenomics variation in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters in relation to docetaxel toxicity in Lebanese breast cancer patients: paving the way for OMICs in low and middle income countries. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 17, 353–367 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eccles, D. et al. Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH): study protocol. BMC Cancer 7, 160 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Puszkiel, A. et al. Factors affecting tamoxifen metabolism in patients with breast cancer: preliminary results of the French PHACS study. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 106, 585–595 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Arellano, C., Allal, B., Goubaa, A., Roché, H. & Chatelut, E. An UPLC-MS/MS method for separation and accurate quantification of tamoxifen and its metabolites isomers. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 100, 254–261 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Caudle, K. E. et al. Standardizing CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype translation: consensus recommendations from the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium and Dutch pharmacogenetics working group. Clin. Transl. Sci. 13, 116–124 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harrell, F. E. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. (Springer, 2001).

  34. Tolaney, S. M. et al. Updated standardized definitions for efficacy end points (STEEP) in adjuvant breast cancer clinical trials: STEEP version 2.0. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 2720–2731 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Little, J. et al. STrengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA)-an extension of the STROBE statement. Genet. Epidemiol. 33, 581–598 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Medical Research Council Singapore (NMRC/1159/2008, NMRCB1011, NRFCG1516, NMRCG13163 and NMRC/CIRG/1423/2015, MOH-000377), the National Research Foundation of Singapore grant (NRF-NRFI2018-01); the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; 01ZP0502, 01EK1509A); the Deutsche Foschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2180–390900677 and DFG grants SCHR 1323/2-1 and MU 1727/2-1; the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen and the Interfaculty Center for Pharmacogenomics and Drug Research (ICEPHA), University of Tuebingen (no grant number). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript and decision for publication. Additional funding for this study was provided by the Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore (no grant number). The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data as well as drafting and submission of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Genome, Singapore, 138672, Singapore

    Chiea Chuen Khor, Zheng Li & Kar Seng Sim

  2. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore

    Chiea Chuen Khor

  3. SingHealth and Duke-NUS Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Programme (EYE ACP), SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore

    Chiea Chuen Khor

  4. Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Whee Sze Ong

  5. Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Elaine Hsuen Lim, Raymond Chee Hui Ng, Yoon Sim Yap, Mabel Wong & Rebecca Dent

  6. Univ Toulouse, Inserm, CRCT, Toulouse, France

    Etienne Chatelut, Cecile Arellano, Florence Dalenc, Melanie White-Koning & Fabienne Thomas

  7. Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse—Oncopole, Toulouse, France

    Etienne Chatelut, Florence Dalenc & Fabienne Thomas

  8. Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Division of Cellular & Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Sylvia Chen, Natalia Sutiman, Joanne Siok Liu Lim, Sze Sing Lee & Balram Chowbay

  9. Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany

    Thomas E. Muerdter, Stefan Winter, Boian Ganchev, Elke Schaeffeler, Michel Eichelbaum, Hiltrud B. Brauch, Werner Schroth & Matthias Schwab

  10. University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

    Thomas E. Muerdter, Stefan Winter, Boian Ganchev, Elke Schaeffeler, Michel Eichelbaum & Werner Schroth

  11. Department of Oncology (Box 193), Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Jean E. Abraham, Carlos Caldas & Helena M. Earl

  12. Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK

    Jean E. Abraham & Helena M. Earl

  13. Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

    Jean E. Abraham, Carlos Caldas & Helena M. Earl

  14. Faculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Diana M. Eccles, William J. Tapper & Tom Maishman

  15. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK

    Diana M. Eccles, William J. Tapper & Tom Maishman

  16. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Nathalie K. Zgheib

  17. Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Leila Dorling

  18. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Qi Guo

  19. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Carlos Caldas

  20. Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Louise Hiller & Janet Dunn

  21. Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Fuh Yong Wong

  22. OncoCare Cancer Centre, Mount Elizabeth Novena Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore

    Nan Soon Wong & Peter Cher Siang Ang

  23. Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital Furstenfeld, Furstenfeld, Austria

    Peter Krippl

  24. Internal Outpatient Department, Medizinische Universitat Graz, Graz, Austria

    Uwe Langsenlehner & Tanja Langsenlehner

  25. Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Arafat Tfayli

  26. Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

    Ute Hamann

  27. University Breast Centre Franconia & University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

    Peter A. Fasching

  28. Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlanger-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

    Matthias W. Beckmann

  29. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Hiltrud B. Brauch & Matthias Schwab

  30. Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) “Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Hiltrud B. Brauch & Matthias Schwab

  31. Clinical Institute of Medical and Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

    Wilfried Renner

  32. Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Biochemistry and Pharmacy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Matthias Schwab

  33. Centre for Clinician-Scientist Development, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

    Balram Chowbay

Authors
  1. Chiea Chuen Khor
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Whee Sze Ong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elaine Hsuen Lim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Etienne Chatelut
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sylvia Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas E. Muerdter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jean E. Abraham
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Natalia Sutiman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Joanne Siok Liu Lim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sze Sing Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Cecile Arellano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zheng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Kar Seng Sim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Diana M. Eccles
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. William J. Tapper
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Tom Maishman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Nathalie K. Zgheib
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Stefan Winter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Boian Ganchev
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Leila Dorling
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Qi Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Carlos Caldas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Helena M. Earl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Louise Hiller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Janet Dunn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Raymond Chee Hui Ng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Yoon Sim Yap
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Mabel Wong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Fuh Yong Wong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Nan Soon Wong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Peter Cher Siang Ang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Rebecca Dent
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Peter Krippl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Uwe Langsenlehner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Tanja Langsenlehner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Arafat Tfayli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  37. Elke Schaeffeler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  38. Michel Eichelbaum
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  39. Ute Hamann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  40. Peter A. Fasching
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  41. Matthias W. Beckmann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  42. Florence Dalenc
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  43. Melanie White-Koning
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  44. Hiltrud B. Brauch
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  45. Werner Schroth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  46. Wilfried Renner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  47. Matthias Schwab
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  48. Fabienne Thomas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  49. Balram Chowbay
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BC conceived and designed the study. EHL, EC, SC, TEM, JEA, NS, JSLL, SSL, CA, ZL, KSS, DME, WJT, TM, NKZ, SW, BG, LD, QG, CC, HME, LH, JD, RCHN, YSY, MW, FYW, NSW, PACS, RD, PK, UL, TL, AT, ES, ME, UH, PAF, MWB, FD, MWK, HBB, WS, WR, MS were involved in patient collection, conduct of study and data collection. CCK, WSO, TEM, HBB, MS, FT and BC contributed to data analysis and interpretation. CCK, WSO and BC drafted the manuscript. All authors participated in manuscript editing, review and approval of final revised manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balram Chowbay.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Carlos Caldas is a member of the AstraZeneca External Science Panel and has received research grants (administered by the University of Cambridge) from AstraZeneca, Genentech, Roche and Servier. Helena M. Earl has received research grants from Roche and Sanofi-Aventis (administered by Cambridge University Hospital Trust), honoraria and travel expenses from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Amgen and Prime Oncology all outside the submitted work. Jean E. Abraham has received research grants from AstraZeneca (administered by the Cambridge University Hospital Trust and the University of Cambridge, Dept of Oncology), honoraria and travel expenses from Astra Zeneca and Pfizer all outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khor, C.C., Ong, W.S., Lim, E.H. et al. A multi-ancestry genome-wide study of tamoxifen metabolism and breast cancer recurrence. npj Breast Cancer (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00931-2

Download citation

  • Received: 03 December 2025

  • Accepted: 03 March 2026

  • Published: 20 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00931-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Breast Cancer (npj Breast Cancer)

ISSN 2374-4677 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer