Fig. 2: Sequencing outputs were comparable among the three capture-based methods. | npj Genomic Medicine

Fig. 2: Sequencing outputs were comparable among the three capture-based methods.

From: Functional comparison of exome capture-based methods for transcriptomic profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors

Fig. 2: Sequencing outputs were comparable among the three capture-based methods.

a Boxplots comparing the number of total input reads show no significant difference among the three exome capture-based methods. b Boxplots comparing uniquely mapped reads percentages among the capture-based methods. The centerline of each box is the median; the lower and upper bounds of the box are the first quartile (Q1) and the third quartile (Q3): the lower and upper whiskers show the minimum and maximum values not exceeding 1.5x interquartile range (IQR).

Back to article page