Table 2 Causal guidelines
Criterion | Definition | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Temporality | Causes must precede effects, including any delay that may be expected between them. | This is necessary for all posited causal effects, even speculative ones. |
Analogy | A proposed causal relationship should have some similarity to a known process or circumstance. | Analogs can make substitutions in one or more organisms, settings, specific exposures, or outcomes. |
Mechanism | A modification of Hill’s original “Plausibility.” Causal relationships should have a plausible theoretical explanation. | This can be in terms of physiology, cellular processes, ‘omics, and more. |
Reproducibility | The attribution of causation is strengthened when results can be replicated by different investigators across different times and places with different study subjects. | |
Specificity | Causal explanations are stronger when the causal relationship is observed in specific contexts, with specific persons, exposures, and outcomes. | This is the classic Person/Place/Time of epidemiology. |
Coherence | The agreement between all evidence, especially when it validates proposed mechanisms. | This is translational science. |