Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Microgravity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj microgravity
  3. perspectives
  4. article
Anterior segment biomechanics and intraocular pressure in microgravity: implications for future spaceflight studies
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Perspective
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 March 2026

Anterior segment biomechanics and intraocular pressure in microgravity: implications for future spaceflight studies

  • Alex Weaver1,
  • Joshua Ong2,
  • Baltaj S. Sandhur3,
  • Ritu Sampige4,
  • Alexander Black1,
  • Andrew G. Lee5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,
  • John Berdahl13,
  • C. Robert Gibson14,15 &
  • …
  • Thomas H. Mader16 

npj Microgravity , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 495 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biophysics
  • Diseases
  • Engineering
  • Medical research

Abstract

Spaceflight acutely but transiently elevates intraocular pressure (IOP), often attributed to cephalad fluid shift and choroidal expansion. We propose that anterior segment mechanics, including lens–iris diaphragm position and conventional outflow loading, may contribute to early IOP changes. Comparing phakic and pseudophakic eyes, paired with anterior segment OCT and complementary imaging aboard the International Space Station, could define mechanisms and inform astronaut screening and ocular risk mitigation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Optic nerve sheath diameter and spaceflight: defining shortcomings and future directions

Article Open access 06 October 2022

The odyssey of the ocular and cerebrospinal fluids during a mission to Mars: the “ocular glymphatic system” under pressure

Article 09 August 2021

Eye-brain axis in microgravity and its implications for Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome

Article Open access 20 July 2023

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Draeger, J., Wirt, H. & Schwartz, R. “TOMEX”, Messung des Augeninnendrucks unter μG-bedingungen. Naturwissenschaften 73, 450–452 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Draeger, J., Schwartz, R., Groenhoff, S. & Stern, C. Self-tonometry under microgravity conditions. Clin. Investig. 71, 700–703 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, J. A. et al. Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmology 119, 1552–1557 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linder, B. J. & Trick, G. L. Simulation of spaceflight with whole-body head-down tilt: influence on intraocular pressure and retinocortical processing. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 58, A139–A142 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mader, T. H., Taylor, G. R., Hunter, N., Caputo, M. & Meehan, R. T. Intraocular pressure, retinal vascular, and visual acuity changes during 48 h of 10 degrees head-down tilt. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 61, 810–813 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mader, T. H. et al. Intraocular pressure and retinal vascular changes during transient exposure to microgravity. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 115, 347–350 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berdahl, J. P. Cataract surgery to lower intraocular pressure. Middle East Afr. J. Ophthalmol. 16, 119–122 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schachar, R. A. Gravity does not affect lens position during accommodation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, 4566–4567 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lister, L. J., Suheimat, M., Verkicharla, P. K., Mallen, E. A. H. & Atchison, D. A. Influence of gravity on ocular lens position. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, 1885–1891 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helmholtz, H. Ueber die accommodation des auges. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1, 1–74 (1855).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, F. et al. Differences between angle configurations in different body positions by ultrasound biomicroscopy in patients with cortical age-related cataract. Clin. Interv. Aging 18, 799–808 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mader, T. H. Intraocular pressure in microgravity. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 31, 947–950 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, T. J. & Lewis, J. Effect of inverted body position on intraocular pressure. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 99, 617–618 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mader, T. H. et al. Optic disc edema, globe flattening, choroidal folds, and hyperopic shifts observed in astronauts after long-duration space flight. Ophthalmology 118, 2058–2069 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Macias, B. R. et al. Association of long-duration spaceflight with anterior and posterior ocular structure changes in astronauts and their recovery. JAMA Ophthalmol. 138, 553–559 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yücel, Y. H., Johnston, M. G., Ly, T. et al. Identification of lymphatics in the ciliary body of the human eye: a novel “uveolymphatic” outflow pathway. Exp. Eye Res. 89, 810–819 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yücel, Y. H., Cardinell, K., Khattak, S. et al. Active lymphatic drainage from the eye measured by noninvasive photoacoustic imaging of near-infrared nanoparticles. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, 2699–2707 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, M., Johnston, M. G., Gupta, N., Moore, S. & Yücel, Y. H. A model to measure lymphatic drainage from the eye. Exp. Eye Res. 93, 586–591 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marshall-Goebel, K. et al. Assessment of jugular venous blood flow stasis and thrombosis during spaceflight. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e1915011 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rasmussen, J. C. et al. Assessing lymphatic route of CSF outflow and peripheral lymphatic contractile activity during head-down tilt using near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Physiol. Rep. 8, e14375 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stern, C. et al. Eye-brain axis in microgravity and its implications for spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome. npj Microgravity 9, 56 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnstone, M., Xin, C., Martin, E. & Wang, R. K. Trabecular meshwork movement controls distal valves and chambers: new glaucoma medical and surgical targets. J. Clin. Med. 12, 6599 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aspelund, A. et al. The Schlemm’s canal is a VEGF-C/VEGFR-3–responsive lymphatic-like vessel. J. Clin. Investig. 124, 3975–3986 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Park, D.-Y., Lee, J., Park, I. et al. Lymphatic regulator PROX1 determines Schlemm’s canal integrity and identity. J. Clin. Investig. 124, 3960–3974 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Memarzadeh, F., Tang, M., Li, Y., Chopra, V., Francis, B. A. & Huang, D. Optical coherence tomography assessment of angle anatomy changes after cataract surgery. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 144, 464–465 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Azuara-Blanco, A. et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388, 1389–1397 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson, A. P. et al. Acute effects of changes to the gravitational vector on the eye. J. Appl. Physiol. 120, 939–946 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mader, T. H. et al. Stability of vision during space flight in an astronaut with bilateral intraocular lenses. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 127, 342–343 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mader, T. H. et al. Intraocular lens use in an astronaut during long duration spaceflight. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 89, 63–65 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chung, K.-Y. et al. Diurnal pattern of intraocular pressure is affected by microgravity when measured in space with the pressure phosphene tonometer (PPT). J. Glaucoma 20, 488–491 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, A. S., Stenger, M. B. & Macias, B. R. Gravitational influence on intraocular pressure: implications for spaceflight and disease. J. Glaucoma 28, 756–764 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sandhu, B. S. et al. The case for anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) for the International Space Station and future planetary spaceflight: clinical relevance and technical implementation. Life Sci. Space Res. 46, 74–85 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Asam, J. S., Polzer, M., Tafreshi, A., Hirnschall, N. & Findl, O. Anterior segment OCT. in High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology: New Frontiers in Biomedical Optics (ed. Bille, J. F.) (Springer, 2019).

  34. Xu, B. Y., Mai, D. D., Penteado, R. C., Saunders, L. & Weinreb, R. N. Reproducibility and agreement of anterior segment parameter measurements obtained using the CASIA2 and Spectralis OCT2 optical coherence tomography devices. J. Glaucoma 26, 974–979 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ritch, R. & Liebmann, J. M. Role of ultrasound biomicroscopy in the differentiation of block glaucomas. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 9, 39–45 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pavlin, C. J., Rutnin, S. S., Devenyi, R., Wand, M. & Foster, F. S. Supraciliary effusions and ciliary body thickening after scleral buckling procedures. Ophthalmology 104, 433–438 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liebmann, J. M., Weinreb, R. N. & Ritch, R. Angle-closure glaucoma associated with occult annular ciliary body detachment. Arch. Ophthalmol. 116, 731–735 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chiao, L. et al. Ocular examination for trauma: clinical ultrasound aboard the International Space Station. J. Trauma 58, 885–889 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meer, E. et al. Ocular conditions and injuries, detection and management in spaceflight. npj Microgravity 9, 37 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ishikawa, H. & Schuman, J. S. Anterior segment imaging: ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmol. Clin. North Am. 17, 7–20 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Willekens, K. et al. Review on dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude. Ophthalmic Res. 55, 91–98 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kaufmann, C., Bachmann, L. M., Robert, Y. C. & Thiel, M. A. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch. Ophthalmol. 124, 1104–1108 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Masis Solano, M. M., Dumas, R., Lesk, M. R. & Costantino, S. Ocular biomechanical responses to long-duration spaceflight. IEEE Open J. Eng. Med. Biol. 6, 127–132 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Norsk, P., Asmar, A., Damgaard, M. & Christensen, N. J. Fluid shifts, vasodilatation and ambulatory blood pressure reduction during long duration spaceflight. J. Physiol. 593, 573–584 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Luce, D. A. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 31, 156–162 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lopes, B. T. et al. Review of in-vivo characterisation of corneal biomechanics. Med. Nov. Technol. Dev. 11, 100073 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Piñero, D. P. & Alcón, N. In vivo characterization of corneal biomechanics. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 40, 870–887 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Touboul, D. et al. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 34, 616–622 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA

    Alex Weaver & Alexander Black

  2. Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Joshua Ong

  3. Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Baltaj S. Sandhur

  4. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Ritu Sampige

  5. Center for Space Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  6. Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  7. The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  8. Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  9. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  10. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  11. Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  12. Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Andrew G. Lee

  13. Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA

    John Berdahl

  14. NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA

    C. Robert Gibson

  15. South Shore Eye Center, League City, TX, USA

    C. Robert Gibson

  16. NASA Ophthalmology, Houston, TX, USA

    Thomas H. Mader

Authors
  1. Alex Weaver
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua Ong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Baltaj S. Sandhur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ritu Sampige
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander Black
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrew G. Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John Berdahl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. C. Robert Gibson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Thomas H. Mader
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.W. led the conceptual development of the paper, produced Figs. 1 and 3, and was a primary contributor to the writing and editing. J.O. proposed the initial research question and contributed to editing. B.S. contributed to writing and editing involving imaging technology. R.S., A.B., A.L., J.B., R.G., and T.M. contributed through editorial suggestions and revisions during later stages of the manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Weaver.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weaver, A., Ong, J., Sandhur, B.S. et al. Anterior segment biomechanics and intraocular pressure in microgravity: implications for future spaceflight studies. npj Microgravity (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-026-00592-2

Download citation

  • Received: 16 October 2025

  • Accepted: 16 March 2026

  • Published: 30 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-026-00592-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Compliance

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Microgravity (npj Microgravity)

ISSN 2373-8065 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing