Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Flexible Electronics
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj flexible electronics
  3. articles
  4. article
Neural network framework for predicting deposition thickness and electrical resistance in printed electronics
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 08 April 2026

Neural network framework for predicting deposition thickness and electrical resistance in printed electronics

  • Ajay Narayan Konda Ravindranath1,
  • Sunil Suresh Domala2,
  • Prashanth Kannan3,
  • Rajashekhar Reddy4 &
  • …
  • Dipti Gupta2 

npj Flexible Electronics (2026) Cite this article

  • 2667 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Electrical and electronic engineering
  • Materials for devices
  • Nanoscale materials
  • Technology

Abstract

Screen printing is a widely adopted technique in flexible printed electronics, but accurate control over deposition thickness and electrical resistance remains challenging due to complex interactions among process parameters. This study presents a two-stage neural network-based framework that predicts wet thickness, dry thickness, and electrical resistance from key printing parameters, including mesh count, ink viscosity, squeegee speed, and curing conditions. A Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model, trained on experimentally collected data, achieves high predictive accuracy (R² > 0.98) with low mean squared error (MSE), effectively capturing nonlinear dependencies and curing-induced variations. Compared to traditional empirical models, the MLP approach eliminates trial-and-error iterations, reduces material waste, and enhances process reproducibility. The proposed framework enables real-time, data-driven optimization and offers a scalable solution for improving fabrication efficiency in printed electronics.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Multi objective optimization of FDM 3D printing parameters set via design of experiments and machine learning algorithms

Article Open access 14 May 2025

Fully screen printed stretchable liquid metal multilayer circuits using green solvents and scalable water-spray sintering

Article Open access 05 March 2025

Generalisable 3D printing error detection and correction via multi-head neural networks

Article Open access 15 August 2022

Data availability

A representative sample of the dataset used in this study has been made publicly available via GitHub at: https://github.com/celestialbody1. The complete datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The implementation details, including the basic architecture and source code, are available at https://github.com/celestialbody1.

References

  1. Arias, A. C., MacKenzie, J. D., McCulloch, I., Rivnay, J. & Salleo, A. Materials and applications for large-area electronics: solution-based approaches. Chem. Rev. 110, 3–24 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shang, J. et al. Fully screen printed stretchable liquid metal multilayer circuits using green solvents and scalable water-spray sintering. npj Flex. Electron. 9, 19 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tüzün, E. et al. Dual-functionality of Hibiscus sabdariffa-CuO nanoparticles in chemotherapy and textile screen-printing on cellulose-based textiles. Cellulose 32, 2471–2488 (2025).

  4. Afroj, S., Tan, S., Abdelkader, A. M., Novoselov, K. S. & Karim, N. Highly conductive, scalable, and machine washable graphene-based e-textiles for multifunctional wearable electronic applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2000293 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wei, R. et al. Revolutionizing wearable technology: advanced fabrication techniques for body-conformable electronics. npj Flex. Electron. 8, 83 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, Q. et al. Strain-insensitive and multiplexed potentiometric ion sensors via printed PMMA molecular layer. Anal. Chim. Acta 1287, 342083 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, Q. et al. Laser-assisted screen-printing of graphene folded reflectarray antenna for millimeter-wave applications. Carbon 227, 119235 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Azadmanjiri, J., Thuniki, N. R., Guzzetta, F. & Sofer, Z. Liquid metals-assisted synthesis of scalable 2D nanomaterials: prospective sediment inks for screen-printed energy storage applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2010320 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jha, S., Agrawal, H., Pant, B. K., Kumar, A. & Kumari, P. Fine line printing for solar cells with knotless screens. in Renewable Energy and Storage Devices for Sustainable Development, Vol. 1 (eds Jain, V. K., Gomes, C. & Verma, A.) 180–181 (Springer, 2022).

  10. Lei, X. et al. Design and analysis of a novel compact metamaterial absorber based on double-layer ITO resistive film for improving signal integrity. IEEE Access 10, 24067–24079 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hossain, M. A. et al. Tuning printability and adhesion of a silver-based ink for high-performance strain gauges manufactured via direct ink writing. ACS Omega 10, 1429–1439 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Y., Qu, Z., Wang, W. & Yu, D. PVA/CMC/PEDOT:PSS mixture hydrogels with high response and low impedance electronic signals for ECG monitoring. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 208, 112088 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ding, Y., Shi, Y., Yu, D. & Wang, W. All-in-one sandwich-like PVA/PEDOT:PSS/WPU electrodes with low impedance and high stretchability for ECG monitoring. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 675, 132060 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lepola, P. et al. Screen-printed EEG electrode set for emergency use. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 213, 19–26 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reddy, R. K., Gandla, S. & Gupta, D. Highly sensitive, rugged, and wearable fabric strain sensor based on graphene-clad polyester knitted elastic band for human motion monitoring. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6, 1900409 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yeo, W.-H. et al. Multifunctional epidermal electronics printed directly onto the skin. Adv. Mater. 25, 2773–2778 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patil, N., Venkatesh, S., Swaminathan, P. & Sumathi, P. Design evaluation and performance analysis of silver nanoparticle ink-based printed heaters. Flex. Print. Electron. 10, 015001 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, R. et al. High-speed sequential deposition of photoactive layers for organic solar cell manufacturing. Nat. Energy 7, 1087–1099 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Y. et al. Mathematical modelling of flow field in 3-dimensional additive printing. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 224, 107326 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krammer, O. & Dušek, K. Numerical investigation on the effect of the printing force and squeegee geometry on stencil printing. J. Manuf. Process. 45, 188–193 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kapur, N., Abbott, S. J., Dolden, E. D. & Gaskell, P. H. Predicting the behavior of screen printing. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 3, 465–473 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tepner, S. et al. Screen pattern simulation for an improved front-side Ag-electrode metallization of Si-solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 28, 1054–1062 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tepner, S. et al. Screen utility simulation—explaining the evolution and future of screen-printed metallization of Si-solar cells. Proc. EU PVSEC 433–443 https://doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20202020-2CV.1.61 (2020).

  24. Goh, G. L., Yap, Y. L., Zhang, H. & Yeong, W. Y. 3D printing of multilayered and multimaterial electronics: a review. Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2100913 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rana, A. et al. Prediction of printing quality and output characteristics of printed electronics using machine learning models. J. Electron. Mater. 51, 4727–4737 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, X. et al. Multi-objective optimization of intense pulsed light sintering process for aerosol jet printed thin film. Mater. Sci. Addit. Manuf. 1, 100026 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, X., Wong, C. H. & Wang, Z. Hybrid machine learning method to determine the optimal operating process window in aerosol jet 3D printing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 41638–41650 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, K. et al. A comparative study of GNN and MLP based machine learning for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease involving data synthesis. Neural Netw. 169, 442–452 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pal, P. et al. Fault sensitivity analysis of printed bespoke multilayer perceptron classifiers. Proc. IEEE Eur. Test. Symp. (ETS) 2024, 1–6 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, S. J. et al. Accelerated deep-learning-based process monitoring of microfluidic inkjet printing. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 46, 65–73 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jeong, J.-W. et al. Materials and optimized designs for human-machine interfaces via epidermal electronics. Adv. Mater. 25, 6839–6846 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. & Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 2278–2324 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Choi, E. et al. Image-based impedance spectroscopy for printed electronics. npj Flex. Electron. 9, 11 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nguyen, J. D., Kumar, S., Frisbie, C. D. & Francis, L. F. Leveraging process fundamentals to improve semiconductor thickness control and uniformity in inkjet-printed Schottky diodes. ACS Appl. Eng. Mater. 2, 693–705 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zeng, M. et al. High-throughput printing of combinatorial materials from aerosols. Nature 617, 292–298 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, X. et al. 3D-printed hierarchical pillar array electrodes for high-performance semi-artificial photosynthesis. Nat. Mater. 21, 811–818 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, L. et al. Vertically grown metal nanosheets integrated with atomic-layer-deposited dielectrics for transistors with subnanometre capacitance-equivalent thicknesses. Nat. Electron. 7, 662–670 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rajak, P. et al. Autonomous reinforcement learning agent for chemical vapor deposition synthesis of quantum materials. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 108 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, P. et al. Fabrication of nano copper highly conductive and flexible printed electronics by direct ink writing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 1847–1860 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dabbagh, S. R., Ozcan, O. & Tasoglu, S. Machine learning-enabled optimization of extrusion-based 3D printing. Methods 206, 27–40 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Choudhury, A., Mondal, A. & Sarkar, S. Searches for the BSM scenarios at the LHC using decision tree-based machine learning algorithms: a comparative study and review of random forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost and LightGBM frameworks. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 233, 2425–2463 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, X., Ng, W. & Yeong, W. Predicting the number of printed cells during inkjet-based bioprinting process based on droplet velocity profile using machine learning approaches. J. Intell. Manuf. 35, 2349–2364 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mustapha, I. B. et al. Comparative analysis of gradient-boosting ensembles for estimation of compressive strength of quaternary blend concrete. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 18, 20 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to Prasad Date from Avery Dennison and Harshad Murlidhar Thombare from SEFAR for their valuable support and data contributions. The authors also thank Afferent Technology Pvt. Ltd. for their assistance in screen printing experiments. The authors acknowledge the FedEX Center at IIT Bombay for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Research in Nanotechnology and Science, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Ajay Narayan Konda Ravindranath

  2. Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Sunil Suresh Domala & Dipti Gupta

  3. ITB-Monash Research Academy, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Prashanth Kannan

  4. Centre of Studies in Resources Engineering, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Rajashekhar Reddy

Authors
  1. Ajay Narayan Konda Ravindranath
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sunil Suresh Domala
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prashanth Kannan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rajashekhar Reddy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dipti Gupta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.N.K.R. conceived the idea, performed the experiments, developed the neural network framework, and wrote the main manuscript. S.S.D. contributed to data generation, assisted in experiments, and supported manuscript editing. P.K. helped with experimental execution, benchmarking, and code management. R.R. contributed to the development of the neural network code and supported result interpretation. D.G. supervised the project, provided conceptual guidance, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ajay Narayan Konda Ravindranath or Dipti Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary (download MP4 )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konda Ravindranath, A.N., Domala, S.S., Kannan, P. et al. Neural network framework for predicting deposition thickness and electrical resistance in printed electronics. npj Flex Electron (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-025-00471-y

Download citation

  • Received: 25 March 2025

  • Accepted: 05 August 2025

  • Published: 08 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-025-00471-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Calls for Papers

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Flexible Electronics (npj Flex Electron)

ISSN 2397-4621 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing