Abstract
Distributed inner product estimation (DIPE) is a fundamental task in quantum information, aiming to estimate the inner product between two unknown quantum states prepared on distributed quantum platforms. Existing rigorous sample complexity analyses are limited to unitary 4-designs, which pose significant practical challenges for near-term quantum devices. This work addresses this challenge by exploring DIPE with structured random circuits. We first establish that DIPE with an arbitrary unitary 2-design ensemble achieves an average sample complexity of \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{{2}^{n}})\), where n is the number of qubits. We then analyze ensembles below unitary 2-designs—specifically, the brickwork and local unitary 2-design ensembles—demonstrating average sample complexities of \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{2.1{8}^{n}})\) and \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{2.{5}^{n}})\), respectively. Furthermore, we analyze the state-dependent sample complexity. For brickwork ensembles, we develop a tensor network approach to compute the asymptotic state-dependent sample complexity, showing that it converges to \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{2.1{8}^{n}})\) as the circuit depth increases. Remarkably, we find that DIPE with the global Clifford ensemble requires \(\Theta (\sqrt{{2}^{n}})\) copies, matching the performance of unitary 4-designs. For both local and global Clifford ensembles, we find that the efficiency can be further enhanced by the nonstabilizerness of states. Additionally, for approximate unitary 4-designs, the performance exponentially approaches that of exact unitary 4-designs as the circuit depth increases. Our results provide theoretically guaranteed methods for implementing DIPE with experimentally feasible unitary ensembles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data that support the plots and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Code that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Popkin, G. Quest for qubits. Science 354, 1090–1093 (2016).
Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
Brown, K. et al. 5 year update to the next steps in quantum computing. arXiv, 2403.08780 (2024).
Flammia, S. T. & Liu, Y.-K. Direct fidelity estimation from few Pauli measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011).
da Silva, M. P., Landon-Cardinal, O. & Poulin, D. Practical characterization of quantum devices without tomography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210404 (2011).
Leone, L., Oliviero, S. F. E. & Hamma, A. Nonstabilizerness determining the hardness of direct fidelity estimation. Phys. Rev. A 107, 022429 (2023).
Emerson, J. et al. Symmetrized characterization of noisy quantum processes. Science 317, 1893–1896 (2007).
Lu, D. et al. Experimental estimation of average fidelity of a Clifford gate on a 7-qubit quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 140505 (2015).
Helsen, J., Roth, I., Onorati, E., Werner, A. & Eisert, J. General framework for randomized benchmarking. PRX Quantum 3, 020357 (2022).
Pallister, S., Linden, N. & Montanaro, A. Optimal verification of entangled states with local measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 170502 (2018).
Wang, K. & Hayashi, M. Optimal verification of two-qubit pure states. Phys. Rev. A 100, 032315 (2019).
Zheng, C., Yu, X., Zhang, Z., Xu, P. & Wang, K. Efficient verification of stabilizer code subspaces with local measurements. arXiv, 2409.19699 (2024).
Chen, S., Xie, W., Xu, P. & Wang, K. Quantum memory assisted entangled state verification with local measurements. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013003 (2025).
Elben, A. et al. Cross-platform verification of intermediate scale quantum devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010504 (2020).
Zhu, D. et al. Cross-platform comparison of arbitrary quantum computations. Nat. Commun. 13, 6620 (2022).
Knörzer, J., Malz, D. & Cirac, J. I. Cross-platform verification in quantum networks. Phys. Rev. A 107, 062424 (2023).
Zheng, C., Yu, X. & Wang, K. Cross-platform comparison of arbitrary quantum processes. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 1–9 (2024).
Hinsche, M. et al. Efficient distributed inner-product estimation via pauli sampling. PRX Quantum 6, 030354 (2025).
Denzler, J., Varona, S., Guaita, T. & Carrasco, J. Highly-entangled, highly-doped states that are efficiently cross-device verifiable. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023320 (2025).
Qian, Y., Du, Y., He, Z., Hsieh, M.-H. & Tao, D. Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform verification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 130601 (2024).
Gong, W., Haferkamp, J., Ye, Q. & Zhang, Z. On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimation. arXiv, 2410.12712 (2024).
Arunachalam, S. & Schatzki, L. Distributed inner product estimation with limited quantum communication. arXiv, 2410.12684 (2024).
Anshu, A., Landau, Z. & Liu, Y. Distributed quantum inner product estimation. In Proc. 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2022, 44–51 (2022).
Schuster, T., Haferkamp, J. & Huang, H.-Y. Random unitaries in extremely low depth. Science 389, 92–96 (2025).
Chen, D. & Zhu, H. Nonstabilizerness enhances thrifty shadow estimation. arXiv, 2410.23977 (2024).
Bravyi, S., Gosset, D., König, R. & Tomamichel, M. Quantum advantage with noisy shallow circuits. Nat. Phys. 16, 1040–1045 (2020).
Bravyi, S., Gosset, D. & König, R. Quantum advantage with shallow circuits. Science 362, 308–311 (2018).
Huang, H.-Y. et al. Learning shallow quantum circuits. In Proc. 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2024, 1343–1351 (2024).
Malz, D., Styliaris, G., Wei, Z.-Y. & Cirac, J. I. Preparation of matrix product states with log-depth quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 040404 (2024).
Landau, Z. & Liu, Y. Learning quantum states prepared by shallow circuits in polynomial time. In Proc. 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2025, 1828-1838 (2025).
Yang, Y. Compression of quantum shallow-circuit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 010603 (2025).
Bertoni, C. et al. Shallow shadows: Expectation estimation using low-depth random Clifford circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 020602 (2024).
Ippoliti, M., Li, Y., Rakovszky, T. & Khemani, V. Operator relaxation and the optimal depth of classical shadows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 230403 (2023).
Akhtar, A. A., Hu, H.-Y. & You, Y.-Z. Scalable and flexible classical shadow tomography with tensor networks. Quantum 7, 1026 (2023).
Hu, H.-Y., Choi, S. & You, Y.-Z. Classical shadow tomography with locally scrambled quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023027 (2023).
Bu, K., Koh, D. E., Garcia, R. J. & Jaffe, A. Classical shadows with Pauli-invariant unitary ensembles. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 1–7 (2024).
Hu, H.-Y. et al. Demonstration of robust and efficient quantum property learning with shallow shadows. Nat. Commun. 16, 2943 (2025).
Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16, 1050–1057 (2020).
Rozon, P.-G., Bao, N. & Agarwal, K. Optimal twirling depth for classical shadows in the presence of noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 130803 (2024).
Farias, R. M. S., Peddinti, R. D., Roth, I. & Aolita, L. Robust ultra-shallow shadows. Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 025044 (2025).
Arienzo, M., Heinrich, M., Roth, I. & Kliesch, M. Closed-form analytic expressions for shadow estimation with brickwork circuits. arXiv, 2211.09835 (2022).
Elben, A., Vermersch, B., Roos, C. F. & Zoller, P. Statistical correlations between locally randomized measurements: A toolbox for probing entanglement in many-body quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 99, 052323 (2019).
Jeon, S. & Oh, C. On the query complexity of unitary channel certification. npj Quant. Inform. 12, 2 (2026).
Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 190505 (2021).
Li, Z., Yi, C., Zhou, Y. & Zhu, H. Nearly query-optimal classical shadow estimation of unitary channels. PRX Quantum 6, 030366 (2025).
Hunter-Jones, N. Unitary designs from statistical mechanics in random quantum circuits. arXiv, 1905.12053 (2019).
Zhu, H. Multiqubit clifford groups are unitary 3-designs. Phys. Rev. A 96, 062336 (2017).
Gross, D., Nezami, S. & Walter, M. Schur–weyl duality for the clifford group with applications: Property testing, a robust hudson theorem, and de finetti representations. Commun. Math. Phys. 385, 1325–1393 (2021).
Acharya, J., Dharmavarapu, A., Liu, Y. & Yu, N. Pauli measurements are not optimal for single-copy tomography. In Proc. 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2025, 718–729 (2025).
Grewal, S., Gupta, M., He, W., Sen, A. & Singhal, M. Pauli measurements are near-optimal for pure state tomography. arXiv, 2601.04444 (2026).
Wu, B. et al. State similarity in modular superconducting quantum processors with classical communications. arXiv, 2506.01657 (2025).
Bravyi, S. & Kitaev, A. Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas. Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
Leone, L., Oliviero, S. F. E. & Hamma, A. Stabilizer rényi entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62471126), the Jiangsu Key R&D Program Project (Grant No. BE2023011-2), the SEU Innovation Capability Enhancement Plan for Doctoral Students (Grant No. CXJH_SEU 24083), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFF0712800), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2242022k60001), and the Big Data Computing Center of Southeast University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.Z and K.W. formulated the idea and designed the protocol. C.Z. conducted the experiments and performed the analysis. All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, C., Wang, K., Yu, X. et al. Distributed quantum inner product estimation with structured random circuits. npj Quantum Inf (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-026-01247-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-026-01247-6


