Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Quantum Information
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj quantum information
  3. articles
  4. article
Distributed quantum inner product estimation with structured random circuits
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 April 2026

Distributed quantum inner product estimation with structured random circuits

  • Congcong Zheng1,2,3,
  • Kun Wang4,
  • Xutao Yu1,2,3,
  • Ping Xu4 &
  • …
  • Zaichen Zhang2,3,5 

npj Quantum Information (2026) Cite this article

  • 1547 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Mathematics and computing
  • Physics

Abstract

Distributed inner product estimation (DIPE) is a fundamental task in quantum information, aiming to estimate the inner product between two unknown quantum states prepared on distributed quantum platforms. Existing rigorous sample complexity analyses are limited to unitary 4-designs, which pose significant practical challenges for near-term quantum devices. This work addresses this challenge by exploring DIPE with structured random circuits. We first establish that DIPE with an arbitrary unitary 2-design ensemble achieves an average sample complexity of \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{{2}^{n}})\), where n is the number of qubits. We then analyze ensembles below unitary 2-designs—specifically, the brickwork and local unitary 2-design ensembles—demonstrating average sample complexities of \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{2.1{8}^{n}})\) and \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{2.{5}^{n}})\), respectively. Furthermore, we analyze the state-dependent sample complexity. For brickwork ensembles, we develop a tensor network approach to compute the asymptotic state-dependent sample complexity, showing that it converges to \({\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{2.1{8}^{n}})\) as the circuit depth increases. Remarkably, we find that DIPE with the global Clifford ensemble requires \(\Theta (\sqrt{{2}^{n}})\) copies, matching the performance of unitary 4-designs. For both local and global Clifford ensembles, we find that the efficiency can be further enhanced by the nonstabilizerness of states. Additionally, for approximate unitary 4-designs, the performance exponentially approaches that of exact unitary 4-designs as the circuit depth increases. Our results provide theoretically guaranteed methods for implementing DIPE with experimentally feasible unitary ensembles.

Similar content being viewed by others

Linear growth of quantum circuit complexity

Article Open access 28 March 2022

Scalable multi-objective genetic algorithm for quantum circuit optimization

Article Open access 18 April 2026

Estimating the randomness of quantum circuit ensembles up to 50 qubits

Article Open access 24 November 2022

Data availability

Data that support the plots and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Code that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Popkin, G. Quest for qubits. Science 354, 1090–1093 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, K. et al. 5 year update to the next steps in quantum computing. arXiv, 2403.08780 (2024).

  4. Flammia, S. T. & Liu, Y.-K. Direct fidelity estimation from few Pauli measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva, M. P., Landon-Cardinal, O. & Poulin, D. Practical characterization of quantum devices without tomography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210404 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leone, L., Oliviero, S. F. E. & Hamma, A. Nonstabilizerness determining the hardness of direct fidelity estimation. Phys. Rev. A 107, 022429 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emerson, J. et al. Symmetrized characterization of noisy quantum processes. Science 317, 1893–1896 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu, D. et al. Experimental estimation of average fidelity of a Clifford gate on a 7-qubit quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 140505 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helsen, J., Roth, I., Onorati, E., Werner, A. & Eisert, J. General framework for randomized benchmarking. PRX Quantum 3, 020357 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pallister, S., Linden, N. & Montanaro, A. Optimal verification of entangled states with local measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 170502 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, K. & Hayashi, M. Optimal verification of two-qubit pure states. Phys. Rev. A 100, 032315 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, C., Yu, X., Zhang, Z., Xu, P. & Wang, K. Efficient verification of stabilizer code subspaces with local measurements. arXiv, 2409.19699 (2024).

  13. Chen, S., Xie, W., Xu, P. & Wang, K. Quantum memory assisted entangled state verification with local measurements. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013003 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elben, A. et al. Cross-platform verification of intermediate scale quantum devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010504 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, D. et al. Cross-platform comparison of arbitrary quantum computations. Nat. Commun. 13, 6620 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knörzer, J., Malz, D. & Cirac, J. I. Cross-platform verification in quantum networks. Phys. Rev. A 107, 062424 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng, C., Yu, X. & Wang, K. Cross-platform comparison of arbitrary quantum processes. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 1–9 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hinsche, M. et al. Efficient distributed inner-product estimation via pauli sampling. PRX Quantum 6, 030354 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Denzler, J., Varona, S., Guaita, T. & Carrasco, J. Highly-entangled, highly-doped states that are efficiently cross-device verifiable. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023320 (2025).

  20. Qian, Y., Du, Y., He, Z., Hsieh, M.-H. & Tao, D. Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform verification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 130601 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gong, W., Haferkamp, J., Ye, Q. & Zhang, Z. On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimation. arXiv, 2410.12712 (2024).

  22. Arunachalam, S. & Schatzki, L. Distributed inner product estimation with limited quantum communication. arXiv, 2410.12684 (2024).

  23. Anshu, A., Landau, Z. & Liu, Y. Distributed quantum inner product estimation. In Proc. 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2022, 44–51 (2022).

  24. Schuster, T., Haferkamp, J. & Huang, H.-Y. Random unitaries in extremely low depth. Science 389, 92–96 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, D. & Zhu, H. Nonstabilizerness enhances thrifty shadow estimation. arXiv, 2410.23977 (2024).

  26. Bravyi, S., Gosset, D., König, R. & Tomamichel, M. Quantum advantage with noisy shallow circuits. Nat. Phys. 16, 1040–1045 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bravyi, S., Gosset, D. & König, R. Quantum advantage with shallow circuits. Science 362, 308–311 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, H.-Y. et al. Learning shallow quantum circuits. In Proc. 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2024, 1343–1351 (2024).

  29. Malz, D., Styliaris, G., Wei, Z.-Y. & Cirac, J. I. Preparation of matrix product states with log-depth quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 040404 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Landau, Z. & Liu, Y. Learning quantum states prepared by shallow circuits in polynomial time. In Proc. 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2025, 1828-1838 (2025).

  31. Yang, Y. Compression of quantum shallow-circuit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 010603 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bertoni, C. et al. Shallow shadows: Expectation estimation using low-depth random Clifford circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 020602 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ippoliti, M., Li, Y., Rakovszky, T. & Khemani, V. Operator relaxation and the optimal depth of classical shadows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 230403 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Akhtar, A. A., Hu, H.-Y. & You, Y.-Z. Scalable and flexible classical shadow tomography with tensor networks. Quantum 7, 1026 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hu, H.-Y., Choi, S. & You, Y.-Z. Classical shadow tomography with locally scrambled quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023027 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bu, K., Koh, D. E., Garcia, R. J. & Jaffe, A. Classical shadows with Pauli-invariant unitary ensembles. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 1–7 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hu, H.-Y. et al. Demonstration of robust and efficient quantum property learning with shallow shadows. Nat. Commun. 16, 2943 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16, 1050–1057 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rozon, P.-G., Bao, N. & Agarwal, K. Optimal twirling depth for classical shadows in the presence of noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 130803 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Farias, R. M. S., Peddinti, R. D., Roth, I. & Aolita, L. Robust ultra-shallow shadows. Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 025044 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Arienzo, M., Heinrich, M., Roth, I. & Kliesch, M. Closed-form analytic expressions for shadow estimation with brickwork circuits. arXiv, 2211.09835 (2022).

  42. Elben, A., Vermersch, B., Roos, C. F. & Zoller, P. Statistical correlations between locally randomized measurements: A toolbox for probing entanglement in many-body quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 99, 052323 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jeon, S. & Oh, C. On the query complexity of unitary channel certification. npj Quant. Inform. 12, 2 (2026).

  44. Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 190505 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, Z., Yi, C., Zhou, Y. & Zhu, H. Nearly query-optimal classical shadow estimation of unitary channels. PRX Quantum 6, 030366 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hunter-Jones, N. Unitary designs from statistical mechanics in random quantum circuits. arXiv, 1905.12053 (2019).

  47. Zhu, H. Multiqubit clifford groups are unitary 3-designs. Phys. Rev. A 96, 062336 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gross, D., Nezami, S. & Walter, M. Schur–weyl duality for the clifford group with applications: Property testing, a robust hudson theorem, and de finetti representations. Commun. Math. Phys. 385, 1325–1393 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Acharya, J., Dharmavarapu, A., Liu, Y. & Yu, N. Pauli measurements are not optimal for single-copy tomography. In Proc. 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2025, 718–729 (2025).

  50. Grewal, S., Gupta, M., He, W., Sen, A. & Singhal, M. Pauli measurements are near-optimal for pure state tomography. arXiv, 2601.04444 (2026).

  51. Wu, B. et al. State similarity in modular superconducting quantum processors with classical communications. arXiv, 2506.01657 (2025).

  52. Bravyi, S. & Kitaev, A. Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas. Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Leone, L., Oliviero, S. F. E. & Hamma, A. Stabilizer rényi entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62471126), the Jiangsu Key R&D Program Project (Grant No. BE2023011-2), the SEU Innovation Capability Enhancement Plan for Doctoral Students (Grant No. CXJH_SEU 24083), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFF0712800), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2242022k60001), and the Big Data Computing Center of Southeast University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Lab of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

    Congcong Zheng & Xutao Yu

  2. Purple Mountain Laboratories, Nanjing, China

    Congcong Zheng, Xutao Yu & Zaichen Zhang

  3. Frontiers Science Center for Mobile Information Communication and Security, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

    Congcong Zheng, Xutao Yu & Zaichen Zhang

  4. College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China

    Kun Wang & Ping Xu

  5. National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China

    Zaichen Zhang

Authors
  1. Congcong Zheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kun Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xutao Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ping Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zaichen Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.Z and K.W. formulated the idea and designed the protocol. C.Z. conducted the experiments and performed the analysis. All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kun Wang or Zaichen Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, C., Wang, K., Yu, X. et al. Distributed quantum inner product estimation with structured random circuits. npj Quantum Inf (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-026-01247-6

Download citation

  • Received: 30 July 2025

  • Accepted: 09 April 2026

  • Published: 21 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-026-01247-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Quantum Information (npj Quantum Inf)

ISSN 2056-6387 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics