Table 2 Selection of clinical trials for neural applications carried out using injectable cell therapy

From: Translational considerations in injectable cell-based therapeutics for neurological applications: concepts, progress and challenges

Cells

Application

Route of administration

Injection device

Cell dose

Volume injected

Flow rate

Outcome

Refs.

MSCs

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Intraspinal

Syringe with 18 G cannula needle mounted on a table fixed arm with a micrometric system. Cannula pre-modified to inject upwards and downwards

110 × 106 cells. During treatment, different cell numbers were obtained in each subject. Only one patient received <15 × 106 cells

Cells suspended in about 1 mL of autologous CSF

Not stated

MSC transplantation into the spinal cord is safe, but no definitive conclusion about cell vitality after transplantation

119

 

Parkinson’s disease

Direct transplantation into the midbrain

Each patient was mounted with a Leksell stereotactic headframe. A 50 μL Hamilton syringe, fitted with a custom-made microinjector. Cell suspension was deposited along each of four putaminal trajectories

Final cell concentration of ≈80,000/μL. Total of 3.2 × 106 cells in one patient and about 4.8 × 106 cells in the other

E.g.: In the first patient, 40 μL injected along four tracks in the right postcommissural putamen, and 32 μL in the left

Not stated

Results demonstrate that such therapies can be effective in some patients at advanced stages of disease. Changes in methodology may result in better clinical outcome

46

 

Chronic spinal cord injury

Intraarterial

Cobra 2 catheter (tubular, polyurethane 4 Fr and 65 cm long)

2.5 × 106 CD 34+ cells/kg

Not stated

10 mL/min

Recovery of somatosensory evoked response to peripheral stimuli in 67% of patients. During a 2.5-year follow-up, this protocol proved safe

120

  

Intrathecal

Not stated

5 × 106 to 10 × 106/kg of mononuclear cells

Not stated

Not stated

No statistical improvement demonstrated. One case of encephalomyelitis after 3rd injection. 24 patients developed neuropathic pain

27

LBS-neurons

Ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke

Intracerebral

0.9 mm-OD cannula with 20 µL. Cells were aspirated into 100 µL syringe

5 × 106 or 1 × 107 cells

10 µL was injected slowly at each site over 2 mins

5 µL/min. Total time was around 150 min

A quantifiable improvement was noted in some patients but no evidence of significant value in motor function

4

MSCs and NSPCs

Ischaemic stroke

Either four IV injections of MSCs or one IV injection of MSCs followed by three injections of MSCs and NSPCs through the cerebellomedullary cistern

Not described

Either four IV injections of MSCs at 0.5 × 106/kg body weight; or one IV injection of MSCs at 0.5 × 106/kg followed by three injections at 5 × 106/patient and NSPCs at 6 × 106/patient

IV injections of MSCs in 250 mL saline; and the injections of MSCs and NSPCs in 10 mL saline

Not stated

No evidence of neurological deterioration, Infection or tumorigenesis at a 2-year follow-up. Neurological functions and disability levels were improved

39

NSI-566RSC (Neuralstem, Inc)

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Intraspinal

Microinjection platform base attached to a custom self-retaining retractor system. Five sequential unilateral injections

1 × 104 cells/mL

5 injections of 10 µL at 4-mm intervals

Not stated

Delivery was well tolerated

121

Olfactory ensheathing cells

Complete, thoracic paraplegia

Intraspinal

25 µL Hamilton syringe with 28 G bevelled needle

80,000 cells/µL

Four injections of 1.1 µL during each penetration

Injections frame-assisted and freehand

Transplantations were feasible and safe up to 3 years post-implantation

43, 122

 

Chronic thoracic paraplegia

Intraspinal

Automatic micropump and 3D micromanipulator, with 25 μL glass syringe and 26 G bevelled needle

30,000–200,000 cells/μL

Volume of single injections was 0.5 μL

2 μL/min

Neurological improvements in the three patients, with confirmation of significance requiring larger sample

42

  1. This table is illustrative of the numerous clinical cell-therapy trials undertaken in the field of neurodegenerative diseases. Trials shown were selected to exemplify the range of therapies currently under investigation, and should not be taken as an indication of the quality of any particular trial.
  2. IV Intravenous.