Table 6 Main biomaterials used for tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs) considering clinical studies.

From: Cellular human tissue-engineered skin substitutes investigated for deep and difficult to heal injuries

Biomaterial

Type of clinical TESSs fabricated

Advantages

Drawbacks

References

Collagen

CESs, CDSs, CSSs, and hMSC-based TESSs

Most abundant animal protein

High tensile strength and stability

Lack of intrinsic angiogenic properties

56,60,61,62,63,64,65,87,90,93,95,101,106,172,173

Collagen-glycosaminoglycan

CSSs and hMSC-based TESSs

Glycosaminoglycan increases mechanical properties and fibril formation of collagen

Requires cross-linking

86,88,89,91,92,104,175

Hyaluronic acid

CDSs, CSSs and hMSC-based TESSs

Ease to handle

Biosafety corroborated by its use in cosmetic field

Angiogenic properties

Less mechanical properties in comparison with collagen

55,60,61,62,63,64,65,97,172

Plasma/fibrin

CESs, CSSs, and hMSC-based TESSs

Composed of proteins that participate in wound healing

Enhances cell proliferation

Combination with other biomaterials is required to increase mechanical properties

49,51,94,96,98,102,103,177

Amniotic membrane

CDSs and hMSC-based TESSs

High tensile strength

Releases several growth factors for angiogenesis and cell proliferation

Difficult to obtain

68,178

Acellular dermal matrix

CESs, CDSs. CSSs, and hMSC-based TESSs

ECM components similar to native human

Minimizes the host response

Specific formation is required to obtain and more time

53,67,99,100,105,174

  1. CES cultured epithelial substitute, CDS cultured dermal substitute, CSS composite skin substitute, hMSC mesenchymal stem cell, TESS tissue-engineered skin substitute.