Table 6 Main biomaterials used for tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs) considering clinical studies.
Biomaterial | Type of clinical TESSs fabricated | Advantages | Drawbacks | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collagen | CESs, CDSs, CSSs, and hMSC-based TESSs | Most abundant animal protein High tensile strength and stability | Lack of intrinsic angiogenic properties | |
Collagen-glycosaminoglycan | CSSs and hMSC-based TESSs | Glycosaminoglycan increases mechanical properties and fibril formation of collagen | Requires cross-linking | |
Hyaluronic acid | CDSs, CSSs and hMSC-based TESSs | Ease to handle Biosafety corroborated by its use in cosmetic field Angiogenic properties | Less mechanical properties in comparison with collagen | |
Plasma/fibrin | CESs, CSSs, and hMSC-based TESSs | Composed of proteins that participate in wound healing Enhances cell proliferation | Combination with other biomaterials is required to increase mechanical properties | |
Amniotic membrane | CDSs and hMSC-based TESSs | High tensile strength Releases several growth factors for angiogenesis and cell proliferation | Difficult to obtain | |
Acellular dermal matrix | CESs, CDSs. CSSs, and hMSC-based TESSs | ECM components similar to native human Minimizes the host response | Specific formation is required to obtain and more time |