Table 2 Region of interest (ROI) validation analysis for the three contrasts using the valence and magnitude cue models.
From: Interaction of schizophrenia and chronic cannabis use on reward anticipation sensitivity
Contrast | Anatomical labelling | Statistics | MNI coordinates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Label | Hemisphere | Z | p(svc) | KE | x | y | z | ||
Reward + Punishment > Neutral | |||||||||
Valence model | Thalamus | R | 3.84 | 0.003 | 20 | 9 | −7 | −2 | |
Magnitude model | dAI | L | 4.24 | 0.001 | 38 | −33 | 23 | −2 | |
R | 3.39 | 0.013 | 17 | 42 | 17 | −2 | |||
vAI | L | 3.65 | 0.006 | 3 | −30 | 20 | −5 | ||
NAcc | L | 3.33 | 0.015 | 5 | −3 | 8 | −5 | ||
R | 4.60 | 0.000 | 25 | 9 | 5 | −5 | |||
Caudate | R | 4.42 | 0.000 | 16 | 9 | 5 | −2 | ||
R | 3.28 | 0.017 | 3 | 18 | 26 | 1 | |||
Thalamus | L | 3.73 | 0.004 | 27 | −6 | −10 | −2 | ||
R | 3.79 | 0.003 | 31 | 3 | −10 | 1 | |||
Reward > Punishment | |||||||||
Valence model | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
Magnitude model | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
High > Low + Neutral | |||||||||
Magnitude model | Caudate | L | 4.36 | 0.000 | 17 | −6 | 8 | −2 | |
R | 4.11 | 0.001 | 14 | 9 | 5 | −2 | |||
NAcc | L | 4.26 | 0.001 | 29 | −6 | 8 | −5 | ||
R | 4.38 | 0.000 | 12 | 9 | 5 | −5 | |||
Amygdala | R | 4.18 | 0.001 | 12 | 18 | −1 | −17 | ||
Thalamus | L | 3.82 | 0.003 | 62 | −15 | −10 | 10 | ||
R | 3.94 | 0.002 | 39 | 6 | −4 | 4 | |||
dAI | L | 3.87 | 0.002 | 23 | −33 | 23 | −5 | ||
R | 4.57 | 0.000 | 43 | 33 | 23 | −8 | |||
vAI | L | 3.78 | 0.003 | 15 | −36 | 17 | −5 | ||
R | 4.71 | 0.000 | 35 | 30 | 20 | −11 |
