Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Schizophrenia
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. schizophrenia
  3. articles
  4. article
An ENIGMA Consortium study of the relationship between white matter microstructure and positive and negative symptom severity in patients with schizophrenia
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 March 2026

An ENIGMA Consortium study of the relationship between white matter microstructure and positive and negative symptom severity in patients with schizophrenia

  • Aoife Warren1,
  • Laurena Holleran1,
  • Ingrid Agartz2,
  • Ole A. Andreassen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4461-35683,
  • Nerisa Banaj4,
  • Dara M. Cannon  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7378-34111,
  • Aiden Corvin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-40895,
  • Melissa Green  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-48746,
  • Ruben Gur  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-19967,
  • Ryota Hashimoto8,
  • Elliot Hong9,
  • Cyril Hoschl10,
  • Peter Kochunov9,11,
  • Stephen M. Lawrie  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2444-567512,
  • Colm McDonald  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1661-51921,
  • Derek Morris1,
  • David Mothersill1,13,
  • Emma Neilson12,
  • Christos Pantelis  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9565-02386,
  • Fabrizio Piras4,
  • Paul E. Rasser14,15,
  • David Roalf8,
  • Theodore D. Satterthwaite7,
  • Ulrich Schall14,
  • Kang Sim  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3209-962616,
  • Antonin Skoch  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1739-325610,
  • Gianfranco Spalletta4,
  • Filip Spaniel  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-696X10,
  • Sophia Thomopoulos17,
  • David Tomecek10,
  • Andrew Zalesky6,
  • Paul M. Thompson17,
  • Neda Jahanshad17,
  • Jessica A. Turner  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-843418,
  • Theo G. M. van Erp19,20 &
  • Gary Donohoe1
  • On behalf of the ENIGMA Consortium Schizophrenia Working Group

Schizophrenia , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2004 Accesses

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Schizophrenia

Abstract

Symptom severity in schizophrenia has been repeatedly associated with thinner cortical gray matter. While global and regional white matter microstructure alterations in schizophrenia are well-documented, their association with clinical symptom severity remains unclear. As this is likely due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, we tested whether symptom severity in schizophrenia was associated with regional and global white matter alterations using standardized methods. We hypothesized that positive symptom severity would be associated with temporal white matter changes and that negative symptom severity would be associated with alterations in frontal white matter. Using a standardized fractional anisotropy (FA) analysis pipeline developed by the ENIGMA consortium, we conducted a meta-analysis of the association between white matter microstructure and symptom severity in n = 1025 (ages 16–68 years; 369 women/656 men) across 19 ENIGMA sites. Where significant heterogeneity was detected across sites, we examined whether variation in association strength between white matter microstructure and symptom severity was explained by duration of illness and/or current antipsychotic use. Positive symptom severity was significantly associated with white matter microstructure as measured using temporal lobe FA and global FA. Negative symptom severity showed no significant association with white matter microstructure as measured using frontal lobe FA or global FA. Significant heterogeneity across sites was observed for the negative symptom analysis, explained partly by duration of illness. Post-hoc exploratory analyses identified one site as disproportionately contributing to this heterogeneity, and when removed, negative symptom severity was significantly associated with both global and frontal FA. These findings support the view of schizophrenia as a disorder of brain connectivity, in a manner relevant to understanding variation in clinical symptom severity.

Similar content being viewed by others

White matter in prolonged glucocorticoid response to psychological stress in schizophrenia

Article Open access 01 July 2021

Parsing heterogeneity in global and local white matter integrity at different stages across the psychosis continuum

Article Open access 13 November 2024

White matter microstructure of superior longitudinal fasciculus II is associated with intelligence and treatment response of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia

Article Open access 27 April 2022

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (G.D.) upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes supporting the findings of this study are available from the first author (A.W.) upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bora, E. et al. Neuroanatomical abnormalities in schizophrenia: a multimodal voxelwise meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Schizophr. Res. 127, 46–57 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Honea, R., Crow, T. J., Passingham, D. & Mackay, C. E. Regional deficits in brain volume in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 2233–2245 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rimol, L. M. et al. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 41–50 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Erp, T. G. M. et al. Cortical brain abnormalities in 4474 individuals with schizophrenia and 5098 control subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium. Biol. Psychiatry 84, 644–654 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karlsgodt, K. H. White matter microstructure across the psychosis spectrum. Trends Neurosci. 43, 406–416 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly, S. et al. Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals: results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 1261–1269 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kubicki, M., McCarley, R. W. & Shenton, M. E. Evidence for white matter abnormalities in schizophrenia. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 18, 121–134 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Narr, K. L. et al. Mapping cortical thickness and gray matter concentration in first episode schizophrenia. Cereb. Cortex 15, 708–719 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walton, E. et al. Positive symptoms associate with cortical thinning in the superior temporal gyrus via the ENIGMA Schizophrenia consortium. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 135, 439–447 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cui, Y. et al. Auditory verbal hallucinations are related to cortical thinning in the left middle temporal gyrus of patients with schizophrenia. Psychol. Med. 48, 115–122 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pettersson-Yeo, W., Allen, P., Benetti, S., McGuire, P. & Mechelli, A. Dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: Where are we now?. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1110–1124 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knöchel, C. et al. Association between white matter fiber integrity and subclinical psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia patients and unaffected relatives. Schizophr. Res. 140, 129–135 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seitz, J. et al. Tractography analysis of 5 white matter bundles and their clinical and cognitive correlates in early-course schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 42, 762–771 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Whitford, T. J. et al. Corpus callosum abnormalities and their association with psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 70–77 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abdul-Rahman, M. F. et al. Arcuate fasciculus abnormalities and their relationship with psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia. PLoS ONE 7, e29315 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ćurčić-Blake, B. et al. Not on speaking terms: hallucinations and structural network disconnectivity in schizophrenia. Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 407–418 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Asami, T. et al. Cerebral white matter abnormalities and their associations with negative but not positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 222, 52–59 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, H. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of anterior commissural fibers in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 130, 78–85 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rotarska-Jagiela, A. et al. Anatomical brain connectivity and positive symptoms of schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 174, 9–16 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seok, J.-H. et al. White matter abnormalities associated with auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: a combined study of voxel-based analyses of diffusion tensor imaging and structural magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Res. 156, 93–104 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Allen, P. et al. Neuroimaging auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: from neuroanatomy to neurochemistry and beyond. Schizophr. Bull. 38, 695–703 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hubl, D. et al. Pathways that make voices: white matter changes in auditory hallucinations. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 658–668 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shergill, S. S. et al. A diffusion tensor imaging study of fasciculi in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 467–473 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Szeszko, P. R. et al. Clinical and neuropsychological correlates of white matter abnormalities in recent onset schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 976–984 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rabinowitz, J. et al. Negative symptoms have greater impact on functioning than positive symptoms in schizophrenia: analysis of CATIE data. Schizophr. Res. 137, 147–150 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Venkatasubramanian, G., Jayakumar, P. N., Gangadhar, B. N. & Keshavan, M. S. Automated MRI parcellation study of regional volume and thickness of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 117, 420–431 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walton, E. et al. Prefrontal cortical thinning links to negative symptoms in schizophrenia via the ENIGMA Consortium. Psychol. Med. 48, 82–94 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Automated MRI parcellation study of regional volume and thickness of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia - Venkatasubramanian - 2008 - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica - Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.nuigalway.idm.oclc.org/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01198.x.

  29. Adamczyk, P. et al. On the relation of white matter brain abnormalities and the asociality symptoms in schizophrenia outpatients—a DTI study. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 81, 80–95 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kristensen, T. D. et al. Changes in negative symptoms are linked to white matter changes in superior longitudinal fasciculus in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 237, 192–201 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wolkin, A. et al. Inferior frontal white matter anisotropy and negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study. AJP 160, 572–574 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, X. et al. Frontal white matter abnormalities reveal the pathological basis underlying negative symptoms in antipsychotic-naïve, first-episode patients with adolescent-onset schizophrenia: evidence from multimodal brain imaging. Schizophr. Res. 222, 258–266 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Seitz-Holland, J. et al. Elucidating the relationship between white matter structure, demographic, and clinical variables in schizophrenia—a multicenter harmonized diffusion tensor imaging study. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 5357–5370 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Steinmann, S., Leicht, G. & Mulert, C. The interhemispheric miscommunication theory of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 145, 83–90 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Holleran, L. et al. The relationship between white matter microstructure and general cognitive ability in patients with schizophrenia and healthy participants in the ENIGMA Consortium. Am. J. Psychiatry 177, 537–547 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Castle, D. J. et al. The diagnostic interview for psychoses (DIP): development, reliability and applications. Psychol. Med. 36, 69–80 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C. & von Cramon, D. Y. The extended language network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 581–593 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tyler, L. K. & Marslen-Wilson, W. Fronto-temporal brain systems supporting spoken language comprehension. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1037–1054 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Asami, T. et al. Abnormalities of middle longitudinal fascicle and disorganization in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 143, 253–259 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bijanki, K. R., Hodis, B., Magnotta, V. A., Zeien, E. & Andreasen, N. C. Effects of age on white matter integrity and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 161, 29–35 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Holleran, L. et al. Altered interhemispheric and temporal lobe white matter microstructural organization in severe chronic schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 944–954 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Male, A. G. et al. Structural white matter abnormalities in Schizophrenia and associations with neurocognitive performance and symptom severity. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 342, 111843 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Viher, P. V. et al. Cerebral white matter structure is associated with DSM-5 schizophrenia symptom dimensions. NeuroImage Clin. 12, 93–99 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bartzokis, G. et al. In vivo evidence of differential impact of typical and atypical antipsychotics on intracortical myelin in adults with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 113, 322–331 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, A. T. & Nasrallah, H. A. Neuroprotective effects of the second generation antipsychotics. Schizophr. Res. 208, 1–7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vita, A., De Peri, L., Deste, G., Barlati, S. & Sacchetti, E. The effect of antipsychotic treatment on cortical gray matter changes in schizophrenia: does the class matter? A meta-analysis and meta-regression of longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Biol. Psychiatry 78, 403–412 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Christensen, J., Holcomb, J. & Garver, D. L. State-related changes in cerebral white matter may underlie psychosis exacerbation. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 130, 71–78 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Huang, J.-Y. et al. Shared and distinct alterations of white matter tracts in remitted and nonremitted patients with schizophrenia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 2007–2019 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Serpa, M. H. et al. State-dependent microstructural white matter changes in drug-naïve patients with first-episode psychosis. Psychol. Med. 47, 2613–2627 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A. & Opler, L. A. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 13, 261–276 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Andreasen NC (1984) The scale for the assessment of positive symptoms (SAPS). University of Iowa, Iowa City.

  52. Andreasen NC (1983) The scale for the assessment of negative symptoms (SANS). University of Iowa, Iowa City.

  53. van Erp, T. G. M. et al. Converting positive and negative symptom scores between PANSS and SAPS/SANS. Schizophr. Res. 152, 289–294 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Smith, S. M. et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31, 1487–1505 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Winklewski, P. J. et al. Understanding the physiopathology behind axial and radial diffusivity changes—What do we know? Front. Neurol. 9, 92 (2018).

  56. Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M. & Cercignani, M. About “axial” and “radial” diffusivities. Magn. Reson. Med. 61, 1255–1260 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jones, D. K. & Cercignani, M. Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data. NMR Biomed. 23, 803–820 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vollmar, C. et al. Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0 T scanners. Neuroimage 51, 1384–1394 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mori, S., Oishi, K. & Faria, A. V. White matter atlases based on diffusion tensor imaging. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 22, 362–369 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cox, S. R. et al. Ageing and brain white matter structure in 3,513 UK Biobank participants. Nat. Commun. 7, 13629 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Penke, L. et al. A general factor of brain white matter integrity predicts information processing speed in healthy older people. J. Neurosci. 30, 7569–7574 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  62. R Core Team (2024). _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

  63. Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G (2019). “How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.” Evidence-Based Mental Health, 153–160.

  64. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was generously supported by grants from the European Research Council (grant no. 677467), Science Foundation Ireland (16/ERCS/3787), and the Health Research Board (RL-2020-007) to G.D., and by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (grant no. NU22-04-00143) to F.S. The ENIGMA Schizophrenia Working Group gratefully acknowledges support from the NIH BD2K award, U54EB020403.

Author information

Author notes
  1. A full list of members and their affiliations appears in the Supplementary Information.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Centre for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), & Galway Neuroscience Centre, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland

    Aoife Warren, Laurena Holleran, Dara M. Cannon, Colm McDonald, Derek Morris, David Mothersill & Gary Donohoe

  2. NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Ingrid Agartz

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Ullevål University Hospital and Institute of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Ole A. Andreassen

  4. Laboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy

    Nerisa Banaj, Fabrizio Piras & Gianfranco Spalletta

  5. Neuropsychiatric Genetics Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Aiden Corvin

  6. Systems Lab, Departments of Psychiatry & Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Melissa Green, Christos Pantelis & Andrew Zalesky

  7. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Ruben Gur & Theodore D. Satterthwaite

  8. Department of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan

    Ryota Hashimoto & David Roalf

  9. Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Elliot Hong & Peter Kochunov

  10. National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia

    Cyril Hoschl, Antonin Skoch, Filip Spaniel & David Tomecek

  11. University of Maryland Center for Brain Imaging Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Peter Kochunov

  12. Department of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Stephen M. Lawrie & Emma Neilson

  13. Department of Psychology, School of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

    David Mothersill

  14. Centre for Brain & Mental Health Research, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

    Paul E. Rasser & Ulrich Schall

  15. Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

    Paul E. Rasser

  16. West Region, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore

    Kang Sim

  17. Imaging Genetics Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Sophia Thomopoulos, Paul M. Thompson & Neda Jahanshad

  18. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Jessica A. Turner

  19. Clinical Translational Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Theo G. M. van Erp & Theo G. M. van Erp

  20. Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Theo G. M. van Erp & Theo G. M. van Erp

Authors
  1. Aoife Warren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laurena Holleran
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ingrid Agartz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ole A. Andreassen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nerisa Banaj
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dara M. Cannon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Aiden Corvin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Melissa Green
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ruben Gur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ryota Hashimoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Elliot Hong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Cyril Hoschl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Peter Kochunov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Stephen M. Lawrie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Colm McDonald
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Derek Morris
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. David Mothersill
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Emma Neilson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Christos Pantelis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Fabrizio Piras
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Paul E. Rasser
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  22. David Roalf
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Theodore D. Satterthwaite
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Ulrich Schall
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Kang Sim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Antonin Skoch
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Gianfranco Spalletta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Filip Spaniel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Sophia Thomopoulos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  30. David Tomecek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Andrew Zalesky
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Paul M. Thompson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Neda Jahanshad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Jessica A. Turner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Theo G. M. van Erp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Gary Donohoe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

On behalf of the ENIGMA Consortium Schizophrenia Working Group

  • Aoife Warren
  • , Laurena Holleran
  • , Ingrid Agartz
  • , Ole A. Andreassen
  • , Nerisa Banaj
  • , Dara M. Cannon
  • , Aiden Corvin
  • , Melissa Green
  • , Ruben Gur
  • , Ryota Hashimoto
  • , Elliot Hong
  • , Cyril Hoschl
  • , Peter Kochunov
  • , Stephen M. Lawrie
  • , Colm McDonald
  • , Derek Morris
  • , David Mothersill
  • , Emma Neilson
  • , Christos Pantelis
  • , Fabrizio Piras
  • , Paul E. Rasser
  • , David Roalf
  • , Theodore D. Satterthwaite
  • , Ulrich Schall
  • , Kang Sim
  • , Antonin Skoch
  • , Gianfranco Spalletta
  • , Filip Spaniel
  • , Sophia Thomopoulos
  • , David Tomecek
  • , Andrew Zalesky
  • , Paul M. Thompson
  • , Neda Jahanshad
  • , Jessica A. Turner
  • , Theo G. M. van Erp
  •  & Gary Donohoe

Contributions

All authors are members of the ENIGMA Schizophrenia Working Group and contributed data following established protocols (https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.170; https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19030225). Each participating site performed site-specific preliminary analyses to assess associations between white matter tract microstructure and symptom severity, accounting for scanner and acquisition differences. G.D. supervised the study. A.W. and L.H. carried out the pooled data analysis, with guidance from G.D. A.W. and G.D. wrote the manuscript. T.v.E. and J.T. currently lead the ENIGMA Schizophrenia Working Group. All authors contributed to manuscript review and editing and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Donohoe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work. N.J. and P.T. received a research grant from Biogen, Inc., for research unrelated to this manuscript. O.A.A. is a consultant for HealthLytix.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Materials for the Manuscript (download DOCX )

Supplementary File with Information of ENIGMA Members (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warren, A., Holleran, L., Agartz, I. et al. An ENIGMA Consortium study of the relationship between white matter microstructure and positive and negative symptom severity in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-026-00728-z

Download citation

  • Received: 06 August 2025

  • Accepted: 07 January 2026

  • Published: 06 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-026-00728-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • Contact
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Meeting Abstracts & Reports
  • Editorial policies
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Schizophrenia (Schizophr)

ISSN 2754-6993 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing