Table 2 Concentrations of free linoleic acid (LA)-derived and α-linolenic acid (ALA)-derived oxylipins in different volumes of soybean oil (pmol/μL).

From: Triacylglycerols are preferentially oxidized over free fatty acids in heated soybean oil

Volume of soybean oil (μL)

1

2

5

8

9-HODE

0.37 ± 0.02a

0.19 ± 0.02b

0.10 ± 0.01c

0.09 ± 0.02c

13-HODE

0.55 ± 0.04a

0.33 ± 0.06b

0.18 ± 0.02c

0.17 ± 0.01c

9-oxo-ODE

0.32 ± 0.04a

0.22 ± 0.02b

0.11 ± 0.01c

0.09 ± 0.01c

13-oxo-ODE

ND1

ND

ND

ND

9(10)-EpOME

0.11 ± 0.102

0.13 ± 0.01

0.10 ± 0.004

0.08 ± 0.01

12(13)-EpOME

0.45 ± 0.06a

0.34 ± 0.03b

0.30 ± 0.02b

0.29 ± 0.02b

9,10-DiHOME

0.16 ± 0.01a

0.12 ± 0.01b

0.10 ± 0.01b

0.10 ± 0.003b

12,13-DiHOME

0.12 ± 0.003a

0.10 ± 0.02ab

0.09 ± 0.004b

0.09 ± 0.004b

9,10,13-TriHOME

ND

0.06 ± 0.082

ND

ND

9,12,13-TriHOME

ND

ND

ND

ND

ΣLA-derived oxylipins

2.08 ± 0.08a

1.49 ± 0.20b

0.98 ± 0.05c

0.91 ± 0.02c

9-HOTrE

ND

ND

0.01 ± 0.004

0.01 ± 0.003

13-HOTrE

ND

ND

ND

ND

ΣALA-derived oxylipins

NA1

NA

0.01 ± 0.004

0.01 ± 0.003

  1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of n = 3 per oil volume. In this particular experiment, the peak areas of free 13-HODE and 9-oxo-ODE in the solvent blank extract (n = 1) accounted for 25–69% and 35–108% of the peak areas detected in oil samples, respectively, suggesting background contamination from the silica or HLB columns used to purify the separated oxylipins. We estimated % background contribution in each sample, using the blank peak area. For 13-HODE, the background peak accounted for 66.2 ± 4.4, 56.4 ± 9.2, 41.5 ± 3.6, and 26.2 ± 0.8% of free oxylipins in 1, 2, 5, and 8 µL oil volumes, respectively. For 9-oxo-ODE, the background peak accounted for 93.9 ± 12.3, 66.9 ± 5.0, 53.7 ± 5.6, and 41.6 ± 5.6% of free oxylipins in 1, 2, 5, and 8 µL oil volumes, respectively.
  2. 1ND: not detected, or NA: non-applicable
  3. 2One of the three samples was not detected, so it was imputed with LOQ/sqrt(2).
  4. a–cDifferent letters within a row are significantly different by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).