Table 2 Multinomial probit model results of milk choice.

From: Spillover effects of food recalls: A milk recall scenario experiment in China

 

Milk_brand

 

Model (1)

Model (2)

 

No purchase

Other brands

No purchase

Other

Brands

Online

0.717**

0.374

1.273*

0.778

 

(0.364)

(0.284)

(0.727)

(0.595)

Voluntary

−1.002**

−0.488

−1.016

−0.326

 

(0.494)

(0.354)

(0.775)

(0.460)

Mandatory

0.245

−0.267

0.713

−0.026

 

(0.440)

(0.366)

(0.620)

(0.474)

Online*Voluntary

  

−0.448

−0.448

   

(0.737)

(0.737)

Online*Mandatory

  

−0.638

−0.632

   

(0.769)

(0.769)

FoodonlinefreqH

−1.138***

−0.811**

−1.154***

−0.813**

 

(0.425)

(0.347)

(0.427)

(0.347)

MilkfreqH

−0.309

0.040

−0.302

0.038

 

(0.421)

(0.337)

(0.425)

(0.340)

WorryH

0.898

0.625

1.007

0.656

 

(0.820)

(0.589)

(0.836)

(0.594)

Price

−0.296

−0.224

−0.329

−0.233

 

(0.210)

(0.163)

(0.213)

(0.164)

Brand

0.053

0.204

0.028

0.197

 

(0.202)

(0.162)

(0.206)

(0.164)

Age

−0.011

0.004

−0.011

0.004

 

(0.019)

(0.015)

(0.019)

(0.015)

Male

−0.074

0.177

−0.089

0.174

 

(0.373)

(0.291)

(0.377)

(0.294)

Edu

−0.009

0.080

−0.004

0.084

 

(0.128)

(0.101)

(0.129)

(0.101)

Income

−0.013

0.002

−0.015

0.001

 

(0.016)

(0.012)

(0.016)

(0.012)

Have_old

−0.241

−0.156

−0.206

−0.132

 

(0.424)

(0.311)

(0.427)

(0.315)

_cons

1.584

0.409

1.393

0.268

 

(2.294)

(1.802)

(2.337)

(1.833)

Observations

360

 

360

 

Wald chi2

34.32

 

34.22

 
  1. Note: standard errors are reported in (). ***, ** and * denote the coefficient estimates are statistically significant at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively.