Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Science of Food
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj science of food
  3. articles
  4. article
Total mercury exposure through canned tuna in oil sold in Quito Ecuador
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 January 2026

Total mercury exposure through canned tuna in oil sold in Quito Ecuador

  • Esteban Trujillo-Cruz1,
  • Lenys Fernández1,
  • Natalia Carpintero-Salvador2,
  • Melany Ruiz-Urigüen2,3,
  • Edison Omar Martínez-Mora4,
  • Diego Bolaños-Méndez1 &
  • …
  • Patricio Espinoza-Montero1 

npj Science of Food , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1047 Accesses

  • 11 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) is a toxic element that bioaccumulates in aquatic organisms, posing health risks through seafood consumption. This study quantified total Hg in canned tuna in oil purchased from supermarkets in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador. Three commercial brands were analyzed according to market price (A < B < C) using a direct mercury analyzer. Mean Hg concentrations were 0.22 ± 0.10 mg/kg, 0.63 ± 0.10 mg/kg, and 0.36 ± 0.15 mg/kg for brands A, B, and C, respectively. All values complied with international safety limits; however, the non-carcinogenic risk (HQ > 1) associated with methylmercury exposure from brand C exceeded the reference threshold established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Recommended weekly intake of tuna to avoid health risks was estimated at 106 g (children) and 512 g (adults) for A; 26 g and 126 g for B; and 64 g and 307 g for C, respectively.

Similar content being viewed by others

Total mercury exposure through canned tuna in water sold in Quito, Ecuador

Article Open access 14 November 2024

Global mercury dataset with predicted methylmercury concentrations in seafoods during 1995–2022

Article Open access 11 February 2025

Total blood mercury and its determinants in New Zealand children and adults

Article 18 February 2021

Data availability

Data “available on request”: lmfernandez@puce.edu.ec.

References

  1. Zuleta, L., Becerra, A. El mercado del atún en Colombia [WWW Document]. Fedesarrollo (accessed 11.21.23). https://repository.fedesarrollo.org.co/bitstream/handle/11445/205/El%20mercado%20del%20atun%20en%20Colombia%20.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y (2013).

  2. Anastacio, J. Preparación y conservas de atún: Exportaciones [WWW Document]. Cámara Nacional de Pesquería (accessed 2 July 2024). https://camaradepesqueria.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020 (2019).

  3. CNP. Cámara de Pesquería [WWW Document]. Cámara Nacional de Pescadería (accessed 2 July 2024) https://camaradepesqueria.com/ecuador-rico-variedades-atun-pelagicos-y-productosderivados/ (2018).

  4. IATTC. LOS ATUNES, PECES PICUDOS, Y OTRAS ESPECIES PELÁGICAS EN EL OCÉANO PACÍFICO ORIENTAL EN 2017 [WWW Document]. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (accessed 11.21.23) https://www.iattc.org/Meetings/Meetings2018/IATTC-93/Docs/_Spanish/IATTC-93-01_La-pesqueria-en-2017-y-la-condicion-de-las-poblaciones-de-atunes-y-peces-picudos.pdf (2018).

  5. INP. Pesquería artesanal desembarque total estimado(t) de Coryphaena hippurus (dorado) 2001–2013 [WWW Document] (Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería, Acuacultura y Pesca, 2015).

  6. Ormaza-González, F. I., Ponce-Villao, G. E. & Pin-Hidalgo, G. M. Low mercury, cadmium and lead concentrations in tuna products from the eastern Pacific. Heliyon 6, e04576 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. Enseñanzas de la Enfermedad de Minamata y el Manejo del Mercurio en Japón [WWW Document]. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. (accessed 11.21.23) https://www.env.go.jp/chemi/tmms/pr-m/mat01/es_full.pdf (2013).

  8. Gaioli, M., Amoedo, D. & González, D. Impacto del mercurio sobre la salud humana y el ambiente. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 110, 259–264 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Revill, A. T., Young, J. W. & Lansdell, M. Stable isotopic evidence for trophic groupings and bio-regionalization of predators and their prey in oceanic waters off eastern Australia. Mar. Biol. 156, 1241–1253 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ruelas-Inzunza, J., Patiño-Mejía, C., Soto-Jiménez, M., Barba-Quintero, G. & Spanopoulos-Hernández, M. Total mercury in canned yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares marketed in northwest Mexico. Food Chem. Toxicol. 49, 3070–3073 (2011a).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raimann, X., Rodríguez, O. L., Chávez, P. & Torrejón, C. Mercurio en pescados y su importancia en la salud. Rev. Med Chil. 142, 1174–1180 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman, D. J., Rattner, B. A., Burton Jr., G. A., Cairns Jr., J. (eds). Handbook of Ecotoxicology (CRC Press, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420032505.

  13. Chen, C. Y. et al. Benthic and pelagic pathways of methylmercury bioaccumulation in Estuarine food webs of the Northeast United States. PLoS ONE 9, e89305 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mason, R. P., Reinfelder, J. R. & Morel, F. M. M. Bioaccumulation of mercury and methylmercury. Water Air Soil Pollut. 80, 915–921 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clarkson, T. W. & Magos, L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 36, 609–662 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmed, Q., Bat, L., Öztekin, A. & Mohammad Ali, Q. A Review on Studies of heavy metal determination in Mackerel and Tuna (Family-Scombridae) fishes. J. Anatol. Environ. Anim. Sci. 3, 107–123 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. FAO. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura 2018 [WWW Document]. FAO (accessed 11.21.23) https://www.fao.org/3/ca0191es/ca0191es.pdf (2018).

  18. Broussard, L. A., Hammett-Stabler, C. A., Winecker, R. E. & Ropero-Miller, J. D. The toxicology of mercury. Lab. Med. 33, 614–625 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brodzka, R. & Trzcinka-Ochocka, M. [Mercury in hair-an indicator of environmental exposure]. Med. Pr. 60, 303–314 (2009).

  20. Castro-González, M. I. & Méndez-Armenta, M. Heavy metals: Implications associated to fish consumption. Environ. Toxicol. Pharm. 26, 263–271 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lacerda, E. M. et al. Comparison of visual functions of two amazonian populations: possible consequences of different mercury exposure. Front. Neurosci. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01428 (2020).

  22. Lalangui-López, K.I., Lema-Chóez, E.A., García-Larreta, F.S., Mariscal-Santi, W.E., Mariscal-García V Guayaquil, R.S., 2017. Ciencias Químicas determination of mercury in canned tuna by atomic absorption spectrophotometry Determinação de mercúrio em atum enlatado por espectrofotometria de absorção 3, 148–164 https://doi.org/10.23857/dom.cien.pocaip.2017.3.4.jul.

  23. Ruiz Chaves, I. Metodologías analíticas utilizadas actualmente para la determinación de mercurio en músculo de pescado. Pensam. Actual. 16, 113 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bravo, J., Tapia, R., Cortés, E., Ceardi, L., Fernández, C., 1979. Determinación de arsénico y mercurio mediante análisis por activación neutrónica instrumental en sombras en polvo. Universidad de Chile, Chile.

  25. León-Pérez, D. E., Muñoz-Jiménez, A. M. & Jiménez-Cartagena, C. Determination of mercury species in fish and seafood by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Validation study. Food Anal. Methods 8, 2383–2391 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suárez-Criado, L., Queipo-Abad, S., Rodríguez-Cea, A., Rodríguez-González, P. & Alonso, J. I. G. Comparison of GC-ICP-MS, GC-EI-MS and GC-EI-MS/MS for the determination of methylmercury, ethylmercury and inorganic mercury in biological samples by triple spike species-specific isotope dilution mass spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 37, 1462–1470 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cortés, C. Determinación de mercurio orgánico e inorgánico en muestras ambientales (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 2017).

  28. Bustamante, L., Fernandez, L. & Cueva, T. G. DETERMINACIÓN Y CUANTIFICACIÓN DE MERCURIO TOTAL EN TEJIDO MUSCULAR DE PARGO (LUTJANUS COLORADO), MEDIANTE LA TÉCNICA DE VAPOR FRÍO ACOPLADO A ESPECTROFOTOMETRÍA DE FLUORESCENCIA ATÓMICA. infoANALÍTICA 9, 151–176 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aguilar-Miranda, A. et al. Total mercury exposure through canned tuna in water sold in Quito, Ecuador. Sci. Rep. 14, 27951 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Burgos, J. Implementación de la Metodología de Voltamperometría Diferencial de Pulsos con Redisolución Anódica (DPASV) para la determinación de Mercurio Total en Atún Enlatado (Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, 2015).

  31. Vásquez-Velarde, M. et al. Evaluation of a gold-nanoparticle-modified carbon-fiber microelectrode to quantify mercury in canned tuna sold in Ecuador. Chemosphere 338, 139483 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. EUR-Lex, 2006. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs [WWW Document]. EUR-Lex.

  33. Médieu, A. et al. Stable tuna mercury concentrations since 1971 illustrate marine inertia and the need for strong emission reductions under the Minamata Convention. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 11, 250–258 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Castellano-Baquero, M. et al. Total mercury content in canned tuna: risk assessment. J. Food Compos. Anal. 143, 107599 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fuentes-Gandara, F., Herrera-Herrera, C., Pinedo-Hernández, J., Marrugo-Negrete, J. & Díez, S. Assessment of human health risk associated with methylmercury in the imported fish marketed in the Caribbean. Environ. Res. 165, 324–329 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bello, Í., Vera, C., Vera, H., Anchundia, X., 2015. DETERMINACIÓN DE MERCURIO EN ENLATADOS DE ATÚ COMERCIAL DE LA CIUDAD DE MANTA, PROVINCIA DE MANABI - ECUADOR. Alimentos Hoy.

  37. Heath, T. L. A History of Greek Mathematics Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

  38. Suykens, J. A., Vandewalle, J. P. & De Moor, B. L. Artificial Neural Networks For Modelling and Control of Non-linear Systems (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).

  39. Farrell, A. P. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment, 1st edn (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2011).

  40. Marine Stewardship Council. TUŃCZYK: KOMPENDIUM WIEDZY O ZRÓWNOWAŻONYCH POŁOWACH (2020).

  41. Nicklisch, S. C., Bonito, L. T., Sandin, S. & Hamdoun, A. Mercury levels of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) are associated with capture location. Environ. Pollut. 229, 87–93 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rasmussen, R. S. & Morrissey, M. T. Effects of canning on total mercury, protein, lipid, and moisture content in troll-caught albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga). Food Chem. 101, 1130–1135 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Barbosa, R. V. et al. Mercury concentrations in tuna blood and muscle mirror seawater methylmercury in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 180, 113801 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shim, S. M., Dorworth, L. E., Lasrado, J. A., Santerre, C. R. Mercury and fatty acids in canned Tuna, Salmon, and Mackerel. J. Food Sci. 69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09915.x (2004).

  45. Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. A Pocket Guide to the EU’s New Fish and Aquaculture Consumer Labels [WWW Document] (Publications Office of the European Union, 2014).

  46. Lino, A. S., Kasper, D., Guida, Y. S., Thomaz, J. R. & Malm, O. Total and methyl mercury distribution in water, sediment, plankton and fish along the Tapajós River basin in the Brazilian Amazon. Chemosphere 235, 690–700 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rice, D. C. The US EPA reference dose for methylmercury: sources of uncertainty. Environ. Res. 95, 406–413 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rice, G., Swartout, J., Mahaffey, K. & Schoeny, R. Derivation of U.S. EPA’S oral reference dose (RFD) for methylmercury. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 23, 41–54 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  49. FDA/EPA. Technical Information on Development of FDA/EPA Advice about Eating Fish for Those Who Might Become or are Pregnant or Breastfeeding and Children Ages 1–11 Years (FDA, 2022).

  50. Alcala-Orozco, M., Morillo-Garcia, Y., Caballero-Gallardo, K., Olivero-Verbel, J. Mercury in Canned Tuna Marketed in Cartagena, Colombia and Estimation of Human Exposure (Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B, 2017) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2017.1323803.

  51. USEPA. Methods 245.1 for Determination of Mercury in Water (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cincinnati. Ohio, 1994).

  52. Paz-Suconota, F. et al. Assessment of total mercury content in fish muscle tissue from the middle basin of the Pastaza River, Ecuador. PLoS ONE 19, e0310688 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. US-EPA. Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories Volume 2: Risk Assessment and Fish Consumption Limits Third Edition (Washington, DC, 2000).

  54. US-EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume III - Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment (Washington, DC, 2001).

  55. WHO-JECFA. Evaluations of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) - METHYLMERCURY. World Hea lth Organization [WHO], & Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives [JECFA] (2021).

  56. Knuth, D. The Art of Computer Programming: Fundamental Algorithms, Volume 1 (3rd edición) 3rd ed. ISBN 0-201-89683-4, Massachusetts, 1997.

  57. Burger, J. & Gochfeld, M. Mercury in canned tuna: white versus light and temporal variation. Environ. Res. 96, 239–249 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Suppin, D., Zahlbruckner, R., Krapfenbauer-Cermak, C. H., Hassan-Hauser, C. H., & Smulders, F. J. M. Mercury, Lead and Cadmium Content of Fresh and Canned Fish Collected from Austrian Retail Operations (2005).

  59. Gerstenberger, S. L., Martinson, A. & Kramer, J. L. An evaluation of mercury concentrations in three brands of canned tuna. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 29, 237–242 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Storelli, M. M., Barone, G., Cuttone, G., Giungato, D. & Garofalo, R. Occurrence of toxic metals (Hg, Cd and Pb) in fresh and canned tuna: public health implications. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48, 3167–3170 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gonzalez-Estecha, M. et al. Mercury in canned tuna in Spain. Is light tuna really light? Food Nutr. Sci. 4, 48–54 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Abolghait, S. K. & Garbaj, A. M. Determination of cadmium, lead and mercury residual levels in meat of canned light tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis and Thunnus albacares) and fresh little tunny (Euthynnus alletteratus) in Libya. Open Vet. J. 5, 130–137 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  63. García, M. Á, Núñez, R., Alonso, J. & Melgar, M. J. Total mercury in fresh and processed tuna marketed in Galicia (NW Spain) in relation to dietary exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 24960–24969 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Paiva, E. L., Morgano, M. A. & Milani, R. F. Cadmium, lead, tin, total mercury, and methylmercury in canned tuna commercialised in São Paulo, Brazil. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 10, 185–191 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Novakov, N. J. et al. Heavy metals and PAHs in canned fish supplies on the Serbian market. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 10, 208–215 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Vieira, H. C., Bordalo, M. D., Morgado, F., Soares, A. M. V. M. & Abreu, S. N. Mercury content in the white and dark muscle of Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) along the canning process: Implications to the consumers. J. Food Compos. Anal. 56, 67–72 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sobhanardakani, S. Tuna fish and common kilka: health risk assessment of metal pollution through consumption of canned fish in Iran. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 12, 157–163 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  68. López, K. L., Chóez, E. A. L., Larreta, F. S. G., Santi, W. M. & García, R. S. M. Determinación de Mercurio en atún enlatado por Espectrofotometría de Absorción Atómica. Dominio de. las Cienc. 3, 148–164 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Popovic, A. R. et al. Levels of toxic elements in canned fish from the Serbian markets and their health risks assessment. J. Food Compos. Anal. 67, 70–76 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dezfouli, A. B., Salar-Amoli, J., Ali-Esfahani, T., Hosseini, H. & Ghanati, K. Evaluating total mercury and methyl mercury contents in canned tuna fish of the Persian Gulf. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 17, 585 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Miedico, O. et al. Lead, cadmium and mercury in canned and unprocessed tuna: six-years monitoring survey, comparison with previous studies and recommended tolerable limits. J. Food Compos. Anal. 94, 103638 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this research thank the Research Directorate of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador for their funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Escuela de Ciencias Químicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

    Esteban Trujillo-Cruz, Lenys Fernández, Diego Bolaños-Méndez & Patricio Espinoza-Montero

  2. Core Lab de Ciencias Ambientales, Decanato de Investigación, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador

    Natalia Carpintero-Salvador & Melany Ruiz-Urigüen

  3. Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador

    Melany Ruiz-Urigüen

  4. Grupo de Investigación Q&A, Universidad Técnica de Machala, El Oro, Ecuador

    Edison Omar Martínez-Mora

Authors
  1. Esteban Trujillo-Cruz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lenys Fernández
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalia Carpintero-Salvador
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Melany Ruiz-Urigüen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edison Omar Martínez-Mora
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Diego Bolaños-Méndez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Patricio Espinoza-Montero
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.T.C.: data curation and methodology; L.F.: contributed to funding acquisition, conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, supervision and writing; N.C.S.: contributed to data acquisition, data curation, methodology and supervision; M.R.U.: contributed to data acquisition, data curation and methodology; E.O.M.M.: contributed to formal analysis; D.B.M.: contributed to data curation and methodology; P.E.M.: contributed to data curation and writing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lenys Fernández or Patricio Espinoza-Montero.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trujillo-Cruz, E., Fernández, L., Carpintero-Salvador, N. et al. Total mercury exposure through canned tuna in oil sold in Quito Ecuador. npj Sci Food (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-025-00693-4

Download citation

  • Received: 18 July 2025

  • Accepted: 25 December 2025

  • Published: 12 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-025-00693-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • 5 questions with our new co-Editor-in-Chief

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Science of Food (npj Sci Food)

ISSN 2396-8370 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene