Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Science of Food
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj science of food
  3. articles
  4. article
Combined Vibrio and nanoplastics stress promotes nanoplastic accumulation while reducing bacterial lethality in shrimp
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 January 2026

Combined Vibrio and nanoplastics stress promotes nanoplastic accumulation while reducing bacterial lethality in shrimp

  • Riying Zhong1,
  • Xilin Fang1,
  • Changwen Li1,
  • Boyuan Zheng1,
  • Guanxiang Zhang1,
  • Han Gong1 &
  • …
  • Muting Yan1,2 

npj Science of Food , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2720 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Nanoplastics (NPs) and pathogenic bacteria are widely present in natural water, yet their interactive effects on aquatic organisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that Vibrio parahaemolyticus can extensively capture free NPs and facilitate their translocation through the intestinal barrier of Litopenaeus vannamei, thereby altering the distribution of NPs within shrimp and exacerbating their accumulation in the hepatopancreas. These findings provide the first evidence that bacteria act as carriers of NPs influencing their translocation. Interestingly, NPs also affect V. parahaemolyticus infection in shrimp by attenuating the virulence of pathogen, as evidenced by downregulated expression of virulence genes (Tdh and Trh), reduced bacterial loads, and improved host survival rates. Single-cell transcriptomics analysis revealed that NPs activate both energy metabolism and immune pathways, collectively enhancing the host’s antioxidative capacity and immunocompetence. These findings offer novel insights into the mechanisms of NPs-pathogen-host interactions and provide critical data for assessing the ecological risks of plastic pollution to seafood safety.

Similar content being viewed by others

In-depth characterization of virulence traits, pathogenicity, antibiogram, and antibiotic resistance genes of MDR Vibrio parahaemolyticus retrieved from shrimp

Article Open access 01 October 2025

Nucleus-forming vibriophage cocktail reduces shrimp mortality in the presence of pathogenic bacteria

Article Open access 19 October 2023

A mechanistic understanding of the effects of polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo

Article Open access 02 February 2023

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Sriket, P. et al. Comparative studies on the effect of the freeze-thawing process on the physicochemical properties and microstructures of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) and white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) muscle. Food Chem. 104, 113–121 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Okasha, L. A. et al. Salinity-dependent vulnerability of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) to Vibrio parahaemolyticus: growth performance and antioxidant response. Aquacult. Int. 33, 347 (2025).

  3. Duan, Y. et al. Toxicological effects of microplastics in Litopenaeus vannamei as indicated by an integrated microbiome, proteomic and metabolomic approach. Sci. Total Environ. 761, 143311 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccarelli, D. et al. Distribution and dynamics of epidemic and pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence factors. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 3, 97 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broberg, C. A., Calder, T. J. & Orth, K. Vibrio parahaemolyticus cell biology and pathogenicity determinants. Microbes Infect. 13, 992–1001 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jatapai, A. et al. An acute gastroenteritis outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O4:K55 in Nursing College, Thailand. Trop. Biomed. 27, 265–274 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aagesen, A. M. et al. Persistence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, is a multifactorial process involving pili and flagella but not type III secretion systems or phase variation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79(10), 3303–3305 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khimmakthong, U. & Sukkarun, P. The spread of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in tissues of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei analyzed by PCR and histopathology. Micro. Pathog. 113, 107–112 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gigault, J. et al. Current opinion: What is a nanoplastic?. Environ. Pollut. 235, 1030–1034 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma, V. K. et al. Nanoplastics are potentially more dangerous than microplastics. Environ. Chem. Lett. 21(4), 1933–1936 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paul, M. B. et al. Complex intestinal and hepatic in vitro barrier models reveal information on uptake and impact of micro-, submicro- and nanoplastics. Environ. Int 179, 108172 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kulkarni, S. A. & Feng, S. S. Effects of particle size and surface modification on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pharm. Res. 30(10), 2512–2522 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahler, G. J. et al. Oral exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles affects iron absorption. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 264–271 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Y. et al. Selective bioaccumulation of polystyrene nanoplastics in fetal rat brain and damage to myelin development. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 278, 116393 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, J. et al. Toxicological effects of nano- and micro-polystyrene plastics on red tilapia: Are larger plastic particles more harmless?. J. Hazard Mater. 396, 122693 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hessler, C. M. et al. The influence of capsular extracellular polymeric substances on the interaction between TiO₂ nanoparticles and planktonic bacteria. Water Res. 46, 4687–4696 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Öztürk, K., Kaplan, M. & Çalış, S. Effects of nanoparticle size, shape, and zeta potential on drug delivery. Int J. Pharm. 666, 124799 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Draviana, H. T. et al. Size and charge effects of metal nanoclusters on antibacterial mechanisms. J. Nanobiotechnol. 21, 428 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, Z. et al. Pseudomonas Stutzeri may alter the environmental fate of polystyrene nanoplastics by trapping them with increasing extracellular polymers. Sci. Total Environ. 954, 176392 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scaria, S. S. et al. Review on impacts of micro- and nano-plastic on aquatic ecosystems and mitigation strategies. Aquat. Toxicol. 265, 106759 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chatterjee, T. et al. The gold nanoparticle reduces Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis by inhibition of biofilm formation and disruption of the production and structure of cholera toxin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 204, 111811 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, P., et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of shrimp immune cells identifies macrophage-like phagocytes. Elife 11 (2022).

  23. Du, L. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the heterogeneity of hepatopancreas cells and their association with gonadal development in the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Aquaculture 601, 742311 (2025).

  24. Zhang, B. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics uncovers potential marker genes of ochratoxin A-sensitive renal cells in an acute toxicity rat model. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 37, 7–13 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, Y. et al. A single-cell atlas of Drosophila trachea reveals glycosylation-mediated Notch signaling in cell fate specification. Nat. Commun. 15, 2019 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun, X. et al. Cell type diversity in scallop adductor muscles revealed by single-cell RNA-Seq. Genomics 113, 3582–3598 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yu, J. et al. Heterogeneity effects of nanoplastics and lead on zebrafish intestinal cells identified by single-cell sequencing. Chemosphere 289, 133133 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hou, L. et al. Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals Eriocheir sinensis hemocyte subpopulations and their molecular responses to Spiroplasma eriocheiris infection. Aquaculture 594 (2025).

  29. Cui, C. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq revealed heterogeneous responses and functional differentiation of hemocytes against white spot syndrome virus infection in Litopenaeus vannamei. J. Virol. 98, e0180523 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, J. J. et al. Activation of toll pathway is different between Kuruma Shrimp and Drosophila. Front Immunol. 8, 1151 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tassanakajon, A. et al. Shrimp humoral responses against pathogens: antimicrobial peptides and melanization. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 80, 81–93 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rennick, J. J., Johnston, A. P. R. & Parton, R. G. Key principles and methods for studying the endocytosis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 266–276 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dai, S. et al. Distinct lipid membrane interaction and uptake of differentially charged nanoplastics in bacteria. J. Nanobiotechnol. 20, 191 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Flemming, H. C. et al. The biofilm matrix: multitasking in a shared space. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 21, 70–86 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bystrianský, L., Hujslová, M. & Gryndler, M. Study of the effects of mineral salts on the biofilm formation on polypropylene fibers using three quantification methods. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 66, 133–143 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu, Z. et al. Bacillus subtilis, a promising bacterial candidate for trapping nanoplastics during water treatment. J. Hazard Mater. 483, 136679 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dogsa, I. et al. Bacillus subtilis EpsA-O: A novel exopolysaccharide structure acting as an efficient adhesive in biofilms. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 98 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao, W. et al. Contrasting effects of extracellular polymeric substances on the surface characteristics of bacterial pathogens and cell attachment to soil particles. Chem. Geol. 410, 79–88 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Davis, C. A. et al., Microbial-induced heterogeneity in the acoustic properties of porous media. Geophysical Research Letters, 2009. 36.

  40. Ren, D. et al. High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation. Isme j. 9, 81–89 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aquino, S. F. & Stuckey, D. C. Soluble microbial products formation in anaerobic chemostats in the presence of toxic compounds. Water Res 38, 255–266 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hu, X. et al. Extracellular Polymeric Substances Acting as a Permeable Barrier Hinder the Lateral Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Front Microbiol 10, 736 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu, S. et al. An invisible workforce in soil: The neglected role of soil biofilms in conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 2720–2748 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Costa, O. Y. A., Raaijmakers, J. M. & Kuramae, E. E. Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Ecological Function and Impact on Soil Aggregation. Front Microbiol 9, 1636 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gao, X. et al. Comparing the effects and mechanisms of exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics with different functional groups on the male reproductive system. Sci. Total Environ. 922, 171299 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Malinowska, K. et al. Polystyrene nanoparticles: the mechanism of their genotoxicity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Nanotoxicology 16, 791–811 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, Y. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals the different roles between hepatopancreas and intestine of Litopenaeus vannamei in immune response to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) challenge. Comp. Biochem Physiol. C. Toxicol. Pharm. 222, 1–10 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lu, Y. et al. Uptake and Accumulation of Polystyrene Microplastics in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) and Toxic Effects in Liver. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4054–4060 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vagner, M. et al. Experimental evidence that polystyrene nanoplastics cross the intestinal barrier of European seabass. Environ. Int 166, 107340 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Claus, S. P., Guillou, H. & Ellero-Simatos, S. The gut microbiota: a major player in the toxicity of environmental pollutants?. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2, 16003 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Meng, X. et al. Systemic effects of nanoplastics on multi-organ at the environmentally relevant dose: The insights in physiological, histological, and oxidative damages. Sci. Total Environ. 892, 164687 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Garcia-Garcia, E., Galindo-Villegas, J. & Mulero, V. Mucosal immunity in the gut: the non-vertebrate perspective. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 40, 278–288 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Soonthornchai, W. et al. Expression of immune-related genes in the digestive organ of shrimp, Penaeus monodon, after an oral infection by Vibrio harveyi. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 34, 19–28 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang, J. et al. Differentially Charged Nanoplastics Induce Distinct Effects on the Growth and Gut of Benthic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis) via Charge-Specific Accumulation and Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 11218–11230 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. She, Q. et al. Impacts of circadian rhythm and melatonin on the specific activities of immune and antioxidant enzymes of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 89, 345–353 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Amparyup, P., Charoensapsri, W. & Tassanakajon, A. Prophenoloxidase system and its role in shrimp immune responses against major pathogens. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 34, 990–1001 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sang, W. et al. Transcriptome analysis of hepatopancreas of Chinese grass shrimp, Palaemonetes sinensis, infected by Enterocytospora artemiae. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 133, 108557 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xu, Y. et al. Toxicity of the microcystin-producing cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa to shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Ecotoxicology 31, 1403–1412 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lin, Z. et al. Micro/Nanoplastics in plantation agricultural products: behavior process, phytotoxicity under biotic and abiotic stresses, and controlling strategies. J. Nanobiotechnology 23, 231 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sökmen, T. et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics (20 nm) are able to bioaccumulate and cause oxidative DNA damages in the brain tissue of zebrafish embryo (Danio rerio). Neurotoxicology 77, 51–59 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. van Rensburg, G. J. et al. Oxidative stress in the freshwater shrimp Caridina africana following exposure to atrazine. Bull. Environ. Contamination Toxicol. 109, 443–449 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Park, K. S. et al. Functional characterization of two type III secretion systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Infect. Immun. 72, 6659–6665 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Goodman, K. E. et al. Exposure of Human Lung Cells to Polystyrene Microplastics Significantly Retards Cell Proliferation and Triggers Morphological Changes. Chem. Res Toxicol. 34, 1069–1081 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wang, Y. L. et al. The Kidney-Related Effects of Polystyrene Microplastics on Human Kidney Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells HK-2 and Male C57BL/6 Mice. Environ. Health Perspect. 129, 57003 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cui, H. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis to evaluate antimony exposure effects on cell-lineage communications within the Drosophila testicular niche. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 270, 115948 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Vogt, G. Cytology, function and dynamics of stem and progenitor cells in decapod crustaceans. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 97, 817–850 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sonakowska, L. et al. Structure and Ultrastructure of the Endodermal Region of the Alimentary Tract in the Freshwater Shrimp Neocaridina heteropoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). PLoS One 10, e0126900 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vogt, G. Functional cytology of the hepatopancreas of decapod crustaceans. J. Morphol. 280, 1405–1444 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ramzan, R., et al., Cytochrome c Oxidase Inhibition by ATP Decreases Mitochondrial ROS Production. Cells, 2022. 11.

  70. Wu, Q. et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics-induced lung apoptosis and ferroptosis via ROS-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 169260 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Li, Y. et al. ROS and DRP1 interactions accelerate the mitochondrial injury induced by polystyrene nanoplastics in human liver HepG2 cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 379, 110502 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bu, W. et al. Unmasking the Invisible Threat: Biological Impacts and Mechanisms of Polystyrene Nanoplastics on Cells. Toxics, 2024. 12.

  73. Winiarska, E., Jutel, M. & Zemelka-Wiacek, M. The potential impact of nano- and microplastics on human health: Understanding human health risks. Environ. Res. 251, 118535 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang, J. et al. White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infection impacts intestinal microbiota composition and function in Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 84, 130–137 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 42377363 and 42177253 to Yan Muting]; the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [Grants 2024A1515011401 and 2024A1515030201 to Yan Muting and Han Gong, respectively]; the Guangdong Provincial Special Project for Promoting Urban-Rural and Regional Coordinated Development through Sci-Tech Achievements into Counties and Towns [Grant 2025B0202010035 to Yan Muting]; the Young Talent Support Project of Guangzhou Association for Science and Technology [Grant QT-2025-014 to Yan Muting]; and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Project, Basic and Applied Basic Research project [Grant 2025A04J5419 to Yan Muting]. Additionally, we acknowledge BioRender.com for assistance in creating graphical elements and Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Meiji, China) for providing technical support in single-cell RNA sequencing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Riying Zhong, Xilin Fang, Changwen Li, Boyuan Zheng, Guanxiang Zhang, Han Gong & Muting Yan

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    Muting Yan

Authors
  1. Riying Zhong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xilin Fang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Changwen Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Boyuan Zheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guanxiang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Han Gong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muting Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.Z. and X.F. conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. C.L. prepared Figures 1-4 and performed statistical analysis. B.Z. and G.Z. contributed to data collection and technical support. H.G. and M.Y. conceived and supervised the project, provided funding, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Han Gong or Muting Yan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, R., Fang, X., Li, C. et al. Combined Vibrio and nanoplastics stress promotes nanoplastic accumulation while reducing bacterial lethality in shrimp. npj Sci Food (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-025-00697-0

Download citation

  • Received: 15 October 2025

  • Accepted: 27 December 2025

  • Published: 13 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-025-00697-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • 5 questions with our new co-Editor-in-Chief

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Science of Food (npj Sci Food)

ISSN 2396-8370 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology