Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Science of Food
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj science of food
  3. articles
  4. article
A multi-country citizen-science study on what makes us enjoy a cup of coffee
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 April 2026

A multi-country citizen-science study on what makes us enjoy a cup of coffee

  • Georgiana Juravle  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5810-69731,
  • Delia Elena Diaconașu2,
  • Ana-Maria Andrei1,3,
  • Felipe Reinoso-Carvalho4,
  • Simon D’Alfonso5,
  • Valentina Goglio6,
  • Kosuke Motoki7,
  • Simone Schmidt5,
  • Ceyhun Uçuk8,9,
  • George Van Doorn10,11,
  • Fabiana Mesquita Carvalho12 &
  • …
  • Charles Spence13 

npj Science of Food (2026) Cite this article

  • 3118 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Psychology
  • Science, technology and society

Abstract

Many coffee preferences are known, but studies that comprehensively integrate simultaneous contributions to coffee enjoyment are lacking. An online citizen-science questionnaire designed to identify those factors associated with momentary coffee liking, surveying demographics, extrinsic/intrinsic qualities, and coffee-related habits, is presented (N = 2987; 5 continents; 7 languages; 11 countries; 77 nationalities). The results indicate a higher liking for coffee consumed black, during spring, in the morning, on Wednesdays, and from ceramic cups. Higher-priced coffee is appreciated significantly more, and liking-consumption quantity appears best-optimised at 4–5 cups/day. Several key characteristics for coffee-dislike are evident: waking-up late, drinking from a cup with a lid on, at noon during autumn, with cream, and, potentially implying a possible coping mechanism for bitterness-disliking, adding sugar to coffee. These results constitute the first multi-country cross-context integration of momentary coffee liking and provide an empirical foundation for context-sensitive models linking sensory/behavioural/temporal factors in beverage preference research.

Similar content being viewed by others

Association between coffee consumption and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults

Article 02 August 2024

AI-driven prediction of consumer liking of coffee from sensory data

Article Open access 14 March 2026

Ultrafast cold-brewing of coffee by picosecond-pulsed laser extraction

Article Open access 08 April 2022

Data availability

The dataset analysed in the current study is not currently publicly available. The present dataset is part of a larger dataset, parts of which are currently being prepared for publication in three other manuscripts, including one specific dataset manuscript focusing on the publishing of the data collected in the entire dataset. With the publication of the general coffee dataset, the dataset analysed in the present manuscript will be public and available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The underlying code for this study is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Sánchez Guerrero, J. A. Top 10 coffee-producing countries in 2024. Coolx. https://coolx.earth/top-10-coffee-producing-countries-in-2024/ (2024).

  2. Triolo, F. A., Figueiredo, B., Martin, D. M. & Farrelly, F. Coffee: a global marketplace icon. Consum. Mark. Cult. 26, 311–320 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Coffee Organization. Coffee Market Report: Beyond Coffee – Towards a Circular Coffee Economy. https://www.icocoffee.org/documents/cy2024-25/coffee-development-report-2022-23.pdf (2024).

  4. Barrea, L. et al. Coffee consumption, health benefits and side effects: a narrative review and update for dietitians and nutritionists. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 63, 1238–1261 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Maso, M. et al. Caffeinated coffee consumption and health outcomes in the US population. A dose–response meta-analysis. Adv. Nutr. 12, 1160–1176 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, X. et al. Coffee drinking timing and mortality in US adults. Eur. Heart J. 46, 749–759 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loftfield, E. et al. Coffee drinking is widespread in the United States, but intake varies by demographics. J. Nutr. 146, 1762–1768 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, W., Sainger, G., Siddiqui, M. S., Mateen, B. Percolating insights: a study on coffee purchase behaviour in an emerging economy. Br. Food J. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2025-0039 (2025).

  9. Samoggia, A. & Riedel, B. Coffee consumption and purchasing behaviour review. Appetite 129, 70–81 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spence, C. Explaining diurnal patterns of food consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 91, 104198 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spence, C. Explaining seasonal patterns of food consumption. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 24, 100332 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deloitte Switzerland. Coffee Report. https://www.deloitte.com/ch/en/Industries/consumer/perspectives/coffee-study.html (2024).

  13. Wang, M. J., Opoku, E. K. & Tham, A. Exploring Gen-Z consumers’ preference for specialty coffee in Taiwan. Young Consum. 25, 368–382 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kent R. Digital food tracking. In Research Methods in Digital Food Studies 143–163 (Routledge, 2021).

  15. Carvalho, F. M. & Spence, C. Cup colour influences consumers’ expectations and experience on tasting specialty coffee. Food Qual. Prefer. 75, 157–169 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carvalho, F. M. & Spence, C. Do metallic-coated cups affect the perception of specialty coffees?. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 23, 100285 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Labbe, D., Rytz, A., Strube, A. & Leloup, V. Impact of mug shape and beverage volume on instant coffee perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 89, 104150 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vegro C. L. R., de Almeida L. F. Global coffee market: socio-economic and cultural dynamics. In Coffee Consumption and Industry Strategies in Brazil 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814721-4.00001-9. (Woodhead, 2020).

  19. Kurz, J., Efendić, E. & Goukens, C. Pricey therefore good?. Psychol. Mark. 40, 1115–1129 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Motoki, K., Takahashi, A. & Spence, C. Tasting atmospherics: Taste associations with coffee shop interiors. Food Qual. Prefer. 94, 104315 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Okop, K. J. et al. Multi-country citizen-science projects to co-design cardiovascular disease prevention strategies. BMC Public Health 23, 2484 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oster, E. Unobservable selection and coefficient stability. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 37, 187–204 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spence C. Gastrophysics: The New Science of Eating (Viking Penguin, 2017).

  24. Spence, C. Ginger: The pungent spice. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 33, 100793 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spence, C. Nutmeg and mace: The sweet and savoury spices. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 36, 100936 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Costanzo, A. Temporal patterns in taste sensitivity. Nutr. Rev. 82, 831–847 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nehlig, A. Is caffeine a cognitive enhancer?. J. Alzheimers Dis. 20, 85–94 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. An, R. Weekend-weekday differences in diet among US adults. Ann. Epidemiol. 26, 57–65 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Forester, G. et al. Time-of-day and day-of-week patterns of binge eating. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 56, 1694–1702 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Diener, E., Inglehart, R. & Tay, L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Soc. Indic. Res. 112, 497–527 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Du, J., Zhu, L., Ma, Y. & Zhang, Y. Beyond weekdays: The impact of the weekend effect on eWOM of hedonic product. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 77, 103624 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Martyn, D., Lau, A., Richardson, P. & Roberts, A. Temporal patterns of caffeine intake in the US. Food Chem. Toxicol. 111, 71–83 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lüscher, T. F. Start your day with a morning coffee!. Eur. Heart J. 46, 760–762 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kanjanakorn, A. & Lee, J. Examining emotions in coffee drinkers in natural environment. s. Food Qual. Prefer. 56, 69–79 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Olivetta, E. Starbucks from USA to Italy: Not only coffee. Micro & Macro Mark 3, 489–508 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barmeyer, C., Mayrhofer, U. & Würfl, K. Informal information flows in organizations: The Italian coffee break. Int. Bus. Rev. 28, 796–801 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bertolini, S. & Tosi, S. Distanziamenti e capitale sociale in smart working. Meridiana 104, 101–124 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spence, C. Just how much of what we taste derives from smell?. Flavour 4, 30 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Spence, C. Leading the consumer by the nose: On olfactory design. Flavour 4, 31 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jeong, S. & Lee, J. Effects of cultural background on consumer perception and acceptability of foods and drinks: a review of latest cross-cultural studies. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 42, 248–256 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ratcliffe, E., Baxter, W. L. & Martin, N. Consumption rituals relating to food and drink: a review and research agenda. Appetite 134, 86–93 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Spinelli, S. et al. Investigating preferred coffee consumption contexts using open-ended questions. Food Qual. Prefer. 61, 63–73 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li, B., Hayes, J. E. & Ziegler, G. R. Maximizing overall liking: a coffee-flavoured milk case study. Food Qual. Prefer. 42, 27–36 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Varela, P., Beltrán, J. & Fiszman, S. Uncovering drivers of coffee liking. Food Qual. Prefer. 32, 152–159 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cornelis, M. C. & van Dam, R. M. Genetic determinants of liking and intake of bitter foods. Sci. Rep. 11, 23845 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, B., Hayes, J. E. & Ziegler, G. R. Interpreting consumer preferences: physicohedonic and psychohedonic models yield different information in a coffee-flavored dairy beverage. Food Qual. Prefer. 36, 27–32 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hadi, R., Rubin, D., Hildebrand, D. & Kramer, T. Flavor fatigue: How cognitive depletion influences consumer enjoyment of complex flavors. J. Consum. Psychol 31, 103–111 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li, X. E., Jervis, S. M. & Drake, M. A. Extrinsic factors influencing product acceptance: a review. J. Food Sci. 80, R901–R909 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Spence, C. Cognitive influence on wine evaluation. Food Res. Int. 187, 114411 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Souza-Coutinho, M. et al. Consumers associate high-quality wines with complexity and persistence. Foods 9, 452 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yeoh, J. P. S. & Spence, C. Music to my lips: effects of musical tempo on coffee drinking. J. Sens. Stud. 40, e70040 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schmidt, L. et al. How context alters value: neural links between price cues and taste. Sci. Rep. 7, 8098 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Convery S. Why are coffee prices going up? The Guardian (7 Jan 2025). https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jan/07/coffee-prices-australia-going-up-cafe-flat-white-cost.

  54. Wood Z. Coffee drinkers face price rises as costs hit record high. The Guardian (11 Dec 2024). https://www.theguardian.com/food/2024/dec/10/coffee-drinkers-face-price-rises-as-costs-on-global-markets-hit-record-high.

  55. Bryant M. ‘Fika has become more expensive’: Rising coffee prices affect a Swedish tradition. The Guardian (12 Apr 2025). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/12/fika-sweden-coffee-prices.

  56. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies Scientific opinion on the safety of caffeine. EFSA J. 13, 4102 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Qureshi, F., Stampfer, M., Kubzansky, L. D. & Trudel-Fitzgerald, C. Coffee consumption and psychological well-being. PLoS ONE 17, e0267500 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ágoston, C. et al. Morningness–eveningness and caffeine consumption: A path analysis. Chronobiol. Int. 36, 1301–1309 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., Buchner, A. & Lang, A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41, 1149–1160 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. G. Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Shannon, C. E. Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 30, 50–64 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wooldridge J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2010).

  64. Lee, C. S. & Conway, C. The role of generalized linear models in handling cost data. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 21, 392–398 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Manning W. Dealing with skewed data on costs and expenditures. In Jones A. M. (Ed.) The Elgar Companion to Health Economics 473–480 (Edward Elgar, 2012).

  66. Gallani S., Krishnan R. Applying the fractional response model to survey research. Harvard Bus. Sch. Acct. Mgmt. Unit Working Paper 16-016 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2642854 (2017).

  67. Molenaar, D., Cúri, M. & Bazán, J. L. Zero and one-inflated IRT models for bounded continuous data. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 47, 693–735 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Papke, L. E. & Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric methods for fractional response variables. J. Appl. Econ. 11, 619–632 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ospina, R. & Ferrari, S. L. P. Inflated beta distributions. Stat Papers 51, 111–126 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Nappo, N., Fiorillo, D. & Lubrano Lavadera, G. Subjective job insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Ital Econ. J. 9, 1153–1179 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Buis M. L. Analyzing proportions. Eighth German Stata Users Group meeting (Institut für Soziologie Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 2010).

  72. Dangerfield, F. et al. Urban-regional patterns of food purchasing behaviour: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015–2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 75, 697–707 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.1) [Computer software].

  74. Watson, N. F. et al. Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 11, 591–592 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Walch, O. J., Cochran, A. & Forger, D. B. A global quantification of normal sleep schedules using smartphone data. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501705 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. World Bank. World Development Indicators (accessed 2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the many coffee shops that facilitated participant recruitment and would like to thank all participants for their voluntary participation and their sharing of coffee insights. G.J. received funding within the project “City-Focus - City: Future Organisation of Changes in Urbanisation and Sustainability”, project code CF 23/27.07.2023, financed through National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania within project call – PNRR-III-C9-2023-I8 PNRR/2023/Component 9/Investment 8. [Financed by the European Union – NextGenerationEU].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sensorimotor Dynamics Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania

    Georgiana Juravle & Ana-Maria Andrei

  2. Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania

    Delia Elena Diaconașu

  3. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Stefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania

    Ana-Maria Andrei

  4. School of Management, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia

    Felipe Reinoso-Carvalho

  5. School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Simon D’Alfonso & Simone Schmidt

  6. Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Valentina Goglio

  7. Faculty of Business and Commerce, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

    Kosuke Motoki

  8. Gastronomy and Culinary Arts Department, Tourism Faculty, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey

    Ceyhun Uçuk

  9. Gastronomy and Culinary Arts Department, Faculty of Applied Science, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ceyhun Uçuk

  10. Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Gippsland Campus, Federation University Australia, Churchill, VIC, Australia

    George Van Doorn

  11. Health Innovation and Transformation Centre, Mt Helen Campus, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC, Australia

    George Van Doorn

  12. Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Food Engineering, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

    Fabiana Mesquita Carvalho

  13. Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK

    Charles Spence

Authors
  1. Georgiana Juravle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Delia Elena Diaconașu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana-Maria Andrei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Felipe Reinoso-Carvalho
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Simon D’Alfonso
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Valentina Goglio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kosuke Motoki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Simone Schmidt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ceyhun Uçuk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. George Van Doorn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fabiana Mesquita Carvalho
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Charles Spence
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualisation: G.J., F.C., C.S.; Methodology: G.J.; Data collection: G.J., A.M.A., F.R.C., S.D., V.G., K.M., S.S., C.U., G.V.D., F.C.; Formal analysis and investigation: G.J., D.E.D.; Writing - original draft preparation: G.J., D.E.D., C.S.; Writing - review and editing: G.J., D.E.D., A.M.A., F.R.C., S.D., V.G., K.M., S.S., C.U., G.V.D., F.C., and C.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgiana Juravle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juravle, G., Diaconașu, D.E., Andrei, AM. et al. A multi-country citizen-science study on what makes us enjoy a cup of coffee. npj Sci Food (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-026-00832-5

Download citation

  • Received: 07 November 2025

  • Accepted: 26 March 2026

  • Published: 22 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-026-00832-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • 5 questions with our new co-Editor-in-Chief

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Science of Food (npj Sci Food)

ISSN 2396-8370 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing