Table 1 Model comparisons show that including RPM problem types explains more variance in SBAC scores
Traditional Raw Score | Common RPM | Exceptional RPM | Common + Exceptional RPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictors | Estimates | Estimates | Estimates | Estimates |
(Intercept) | 0.04 (0.030) | 0.03 (0.028) | 0.03 (0.029) | 0.03 (0.028) |
Grade | 0.09** (0.040) | 0.04 (0.037) | 0.007 (0.040) | 0.02 (0.038) |
Household Income | −0.37*** (0.031) | −0.27*** (0.030) | −0.33*** (0.031) | −0.27*** (0.030) |
Basic Response Time | 0.07 (0.037) | 0.07* (0.034) | 0.06 (0.036) | 0.07* (0.034) |
Flanker | 0.19*** (0.045) | 0.10* (0.042) | 0.12** (0.044) | 0.10* (0.042) |
Spatial Span | 0.11** (0.033) | 0.10** (0.030) | 0.10** (0.032) | 0.10** (0.030) |
Traditional Raw Score | 0.27*** (0.033) | – | – | – |
RPM Common | – | 0.48*** (0.035) | – | 0.47*** (0.057) |
RPM Exceptional | – | – | 0.40*** (0.039) | 0.01 (0.061) |
Observations | 599 | 599 | 599 | 599 |
R2 | 0.457 | 0.543 | 0.491 | 0.543 |
R2adj. | 0.452 | 0.538 | 0.486 | 0.537 |
