Table 2 Comparison of in vitro and in silico reaction rates for cultivation of BB-12 and BB-46 in the newly formulated chemically defined medium.

From: Identifying the essential nutritional requirements of the probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis and Bifidobacterium longum through genome-scale modeling

 

BB-12 in vitro

BB-12 in silico

BB-46 in vitro

BB-46 in silico

Growth rate [h−1]

0.45 ± 0.0

0.44

0.35 ± 0.0

0.34

Sucrose uptake rate [mmol gCDW−1 h−1]

3.9 ± 0.2

3.9

2.8 ± 0.4

2.8

Acetate:lactate ratio [-]

2.5 ± 0.0

2.5

17.3 ± 0.0

17.3

Acetate secretion rate [mmol gCDW−1 h−1]

11.8 ± 0.7

12.0

11.9 ± 0.3

10.4

Lactate secretion rate [mmol gCDW−1 h−1]

4.7 ± 0.3

4.8

0.7 ± 0.0

0.6

Formate secretion rate [mmol gCDW−1 h−1]

0.3 ± 0.0

3.3

4.0 ± 0.2

5.8

Succinate secretion rate [mmol gCDW−1 h−1]

0.2 ± 0.0

0.2

0.2 ± 0.0

0.1

Ethanol secretion rate [mmol gCDW−1 h−1]

0.4

2.5 ± 0.3

1.7

Carbon recovery excluding biomass formation [%]

82

106

  1. The sucrose uptake rate and the acetate:lactate ratio were constrained to the experimentally determined values. Amino acid uptake rates were constrained to 1 mmol gCDW−1 h−1. The carbon recovery was calculated based on the specific rates determined during the exponential growth phase and does not include biomass formation. In vitro reaction rates are given as means of three replicates (n = 3) ± standard deviations.