Table 3 Correlation between NAF and prediction precision for each species pair, across rows similar to those in Table 2.

From: SANA: cross-species prediction of Gene Ontology GO annotations via topological network alignment

Pair

Rows

ρ

p-value

σ

SC-DM

18

0.8436

3.416 × 10−5

6.2844

SC-HS

17

0.8741

8.544 × 10−6

6.9706

MM-DM

14

0.709

0.0356

3.4823

SP-DM

18

0.5425

0.1937

2.5832

AT-HS

17

0.8338

0.0001243

5.8490

AT-DM

17

0.9301

1.284 × 10−8

9.8053

CE-HS

16

0.6352

0.07426

3.0771

MM-CE

16

0.9252

1.032 × 10−7

9.1228

MM-SP

16

0.7642

0.003988

4.4333

SP-AT

18

0.8393

4.496 × 10−5

6.1739

DM-HS

16

0.7672

0.003627

4.4753

AT-CE

17

0.8804

5.087 × 10−6

7.1898

SP-CE

18

0.8864

1.15 × 10−6

7.6598

CE-DM

15

−0.2407

0.4805

0.8943

SP-HS

17

0.7413

0.005154

4.2774

MM-HS

15

0.2273

0.5011

0.8418

RN-CE

16

0.7

0.02165

3.6677

MM-AT

14

0.9327

4.893 × 10−7

8.9604

RN-SP

6

0.8793

0.08192

3.6916

RN-DM

6

0.8885

0.06864

3.8726

RN-AT

6

0.9643

0.003344

7.2840

RN-MM

6

0.9068

0.04537

4.3019

TOTAL (non-normalized)

213

0.314

0.00023

4.74

TOTAL (normalized)

213

0.749

7.27 × 10−38

15.5

  1. Each row represents one species pair with the NAF-precision correlation across all measures. The second-last row is the correlation between NAF and prediction precision across all species and all measures. However, as seen in Table 2, the scaling between NAF and precision can differ substantially across species, which muddles the correlation. We correct for this in the final row, where we have normalized the NAF and precision to their maximum values on a per-species basis.
Back to article page